The current status of Open Access in biomedical field: The comparison of countries relating to the impact of national policies

Mamiko Matsubayashi, Keiko Kurata, Yukiko Sakai, Tomoko Morioka, Shinya Kato, Shinji Mine, Shuichi Ueda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to show the current status of Open Access (OA) in biomedical field, and compare some countries such as the U.S., the U.K. and Japan in terms of the OA situation. There are controversies about the definition of OA. After examining the requirements about OA, we recognized OA as the situation in which researchers could read the full text of articles in unrestricted way. In order to investigate the current situation of OA, 4,756 articles were sampled randomly from articles published between January and September in 2005 and indexed in PubMed. The main results are as follows: 1) The rate of OA articles was 25%, and 75% of all the articles were available online including electronic subscription journal articles. 2) The means of OA was classified into five types. Among them, the rate of OA articles by "OA and Hybrid OA journals" was overwhelming (more than 70%), and that of PMC was 26.2%. The rates of OA articles by "institutional repositories" and "authors' personal sites" were considerably low (6.0% and 4.9% respectively). 3) When comparing the rates of OA articles by countries, Belgium ranked the first with 41.7%. The five countries indicated more than 30% in OA articles: Canada and India (38.7%), Brazil (36.4%), Australia (30.8%), and the U.S. (30.7%). Each country was different in the means of OA. 4) We explored the rates of OA for two groups; one group consists of articles published in journals with IF, and the other consists of articles published in journals without IF. The rate of OA for the group of articles in journals with IF is 20.6%, and that of articles in journals without IF is 30.8%.

Original languageEnglish
JournalProceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting
Volume43
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

open access
Group
subscription
Belgium

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

The current status of Open Access in biomedical field : The comparison of countries relating to the impact of national policies. / Matsubayashi, Mamiko; Kurata, Keiko; Sakai, Yukiko; Morioka, Tomoko; Kato, Shinya; Mine, Shinji; Ueda, Shuichi.

In: Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, Vol. 43, 2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matsubayashi, Mamiko ; Kurata, Keiko ; Sakai, Yukiko ; Morioka, Tomoko ; Kato, Shinya ; Mine, Shinji ; Ueda, Shuichi. / The current status of Open Access in biomedical field : The comparison of countries relating to the impact of national policies. In: Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting. 2006 ; Vol. 43.
@article{630023f9bf834ce89e98e3ef1e74d894,
title = "The current status of Open Access in biomedical field: The comparison of countries relating to the impact of national policies",
abstract = "The purpose of the article is to show the current status of Open Access (OA) in biomedical field, and compare some countries such as the U.S., the U.K. and Japan in terms of the OA situation. There are controversies about the definition of OA. After examining the requirements about OA, we recognized OA as the situation in which researchers could read the full text of articles in unrestricted way. In order to investigate the current situation of OA, 4,756 articles were sampled randomly from articles published between January and September in 2005 and indexed in PubMed. The main results are as follows: 1) The rate of OA articles was 25{\%}, and 75{\%} of all the articles were available online including electronic subscription journal articles. 2) The means of OA was classified into five types. Among them, the rate of OA articles by {"}OA and Hybrid OA journals{"} was overwhelming (more than 70{\%}), and that of PMC was 26.2{\%}. The rates of OA articles by {"}institutional repositories{"} and {"}authors' personal sites{"} were considerably low (6.0{\%} and 4.9{\%} respectively). 3) When comparing the rates of OA articles by countries, Belgium ranked the first with 41.7{\%}. The five countries indicated more than 30{\%} in OA articles: Canada and India (38.7{\%}), Brazil (36.4{\%}), Australia (30.8{\%}), and the U.S. (30.7{\%}). Each country was different in the means of OA. 4) We explored the rates of OA for two groups; one group consists of articles published in journals with IF, and the other consists of articles published in journals without IF. The rate of OA for the group of articles in journals with IF is 20.6{\%}, and that of articles in journals without IF is 30.8{\%}.",
author = "Mamiko Matsubayashi and Keiko Kurata and Yukiko Sakai and Tomoko Morioka and Shinya Kato and Shinji Mine and Shuichi Ueda",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
journal = "Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting",
issn = "0044-7870",
publisher = "Learned Information",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The current status of Open Access in biomedical field

T2 - The comparison of countries relating to the impact of national policies

AU - Matsubayashi, Mamiko

AU - Kurata, Keiko

AU - Sakai, Yukiko

AU - Morioka, Tomoko

AU - Kato, Shinya

AU - Mine, Shinji

AU - Ueda, Shuichi

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The purpose of the article is to show the current status of Open Access (OA) in biomedical field, and compare some countries such as the U.S., the U.K. and Japan in terms of the OA situation. There are controversies about the definition of OA. After examining the requirements about OA, we recognized OA as the situation in which researchers could read the full text of articles in unrestricted way. In order to investigate the current situation of OA, 4,756 articles were sampled randomly from articles published between January and September in 2005 and indexed in PubMed. The main results are as follows: 1) The rate of OA articles was 25%, and 75% of all the articles were available online including electronic subscription journal articles. 2) The means of OA was classified into five types. Among them, the rate of OA articles by "OA and Hybrid OA journals" was overwhelming (more than 70%), and that of PMC was 26.2%. The rates of OA articles by "institutional repositories" and "authors' personal sites" were considerably low (6.0% and 4.9% respectively). 3) When comparing the rates of OA articles by countries, Belgium ranked the first with 41.7%. The five countries indicated more than 30% in OA articles: Canada and India (38.7%), Brazil (36.4%), Australia (30.8%), and the U.S. (30.7%). Each country was different in the means of OA. 4) We explored the rates of OA for two groups; one group consists of articles published in journals with IF, and the other consists of articles published in journals without IF. The rate of OA for the group of articles in journals with IF is 20.6%, and that of articles in journals without IF is 30.8%.

AB - The purpose of the article is to show the current status of Open Access (OA) in biomedical field, and compare some countries such as the U.S., the U.K. and Japan in terms of the OA situation. There are controversies about the definition of OA. After examining the requirements about OA, we recognized OA as the situation in which researchers could read the full text of articles in unrestricted way. In order to investigate the current situation of OA, 4,756 articles were sampled randomly from articles published between January and September in 2005 and indexed in PubMed. The main results are as follows: 1) The rate of OA articles was 25%, and 75% of all the articles were available online including electronic subscription journal articles. 2) The means of OA was classified into five types. Among them, the rate of OA articles by "OA and Hybrid OA journals" was overwhelming (more than 70%), and that of PMC was 26.2%. The rates of OA articles by "institutional repositories" and "authors' personal sites" were considerably low (6.0% and 4.9% respectively). 3) When comparing the rates of OA articles by countries, Belgium ranked the first with 41.7%. The five countries indicated more than 30% in OA articles: Canada and India (38.7%), Brazil (36.4%), Australia (30.8%), and the U.S. (30.7%). Each country was different in the means of OA. 4) We explored the rates of OA for two groups; one group consists of articles published in journals with IF, and the other consists of articles published in journals without IF. The rate of OA for the group of articles in journals with IF is 20.6%, and that of articles in journals without IF is 30.8%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847630723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847630723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33847630723

VL - 43

JO - Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

JF - Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

SN - 0044-7870

ER -