The Difference between the Two Representative Kampo Formulas for Treating Dysmenorrhea: An Observational Study

Tetsuhiro Yoshino, Kotoe Katayama, Yuko Horiba, Kaori Munakata, Rui Yamaguchi, Seiya Imoto, Satoru Miyano, Hideki Mima, Kenji Watanabe, Masaru Mimura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Kampo medicine, two different formulas are effective for treating dysmenorrhea - tokishakuyakusan and keishibukuryogan; however, the criteria by which specialists select the appropriate formula for each patient are not clear. We compared patients treated with tokishakuyakusan and those with keishibukuryogan and proposed a predictive model. The study included 168 primary and secondary dysmenorrhea patients who visited the Kampo Clinic at Keio University Hospital. We collected clinical data from 128 dysmenorrhea patients, compared the two patient groups and selected significantly different factors as potential predictors, and used logistic regression to establish a model. An external validation was performed using 40 dysmenorrhea patients. Lightheadedness, BMI <18.5, and a weak abdomen were significantly more frequent in the tokishakuyakusan group; tendency to sweat, heat intolerance, leg numbness, a cold sensation in the lower back, a strong abdomen, and paraumbilical tenderness and resistance were more frequent in the keishibukuryogan group. The final model fitted the data well. Internally estimated accuracy was 81.2%, and a leave-one-out cross-validation estimate of accuracy was 80.5%. External validation accuracy was 85.0%. We proposed a model for predicting the use of two Kampo formulas for dysmenorrhea, which should be validated in prospective trials.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3159617
JournalEvidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Kampo Medicine
Dysmenorrhea
Observational Studies
Abdomen
Hypesthesia
Sweat
Dizziness
Leg
Hot Temperature
Logistic Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

The Difference between the Two Representative Kampo Formulas for Treating Dysmenorrhea : An Observational Study. / Yoshino, Tetsuhiro; Katayama, Kotoe; Horiba, Yuko; Munakata, Kaori; Yamaguchi, Rui; Imoto, Seiya; Miyano, Satoru; Mima, Hideki; Watanabe, Kenji; Mimura, Masaru.

In: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol. 2016, 3159617, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yoshino, Tetsuhiro ; Katayama, Kotoe ; Horiba, Yuko ; Munakata, Kaori ; Yamaguchi, Rui ; Imoto, Seiya ; Miyano, Satoru ; Mima, Hideki ; Watanabe, Kenji ; Mimura, Masaru. / The Difference between the Two Representative Kampo Formulas for Treating Dysmenorrhea : An Observational Study. In: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 2016.
@article{d01c7f83429c4be2a3800f6d154c5cee,
title = "The Difference between the Two Representative Kampo Formulas for Treating Dysmenorrhea: An Observational Study",
abstract = "In Kampo medicine, two different formulas are effective for treating dysmenorrhea - tokishakuyakusan and keishibukuryogan; however, the criteria by which specialists select the appropriate formula for each patient are not clear. We compared patients treated with tokishakuyakusan and those with keishibukuryogan and proposed a predictive model. The study included 168 primary and secondary dysmenorrhea patients who visited the Kampo Clinic at Keio University Hospital. We collected clinical data from 128 dysmenorrhea patients, compared the two patient groups and selected significantly different factors as potential predictors, and used logistic regression to establish a model. An external validation was performed using 40 dysmenorrhea patients. Lightheadedness, BMI <18.5, and a weak abdomen were significantly more frequent in the tokishakuyakusan group; tendency to sweat, heat intolerance, leg numbness, a cold sensation in the lower back, a strong abdomen, and paraumbilical tenderness and resistance were more frequent in the keishibukuryogan group. The final model fitted the data well. Internally estimated accuracy was 81.2{\%}, and a leave-one-out cross-validation estimate of accuracy was 80.5{\%}. External validation accuracy was 85.0{\%}. We proposed a model for predicting the use of two Kampo formulas for dysmenorrhea, which should be validated in prospective trials.",
author = "Tetsuhiro Yoshino and Kotoe Katayama and Yuko Horiba and Kaori Munakata and Rui Yamaguchi and Seiya Imoto and Satoru Miyano and Hideki Mima and Kenji Watanabe and Masaru Mimura",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1155/2016/3159617",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine",
issn = "1741-427X",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Difference between the Two Representative Kampo Formulas for Treating Dysmenorrhea

T2 - An Observational Study

AU - Yoshino, Tetsuhiro

AU - Katayama, Kotoe

AU - Horiba, Yuko

AU - Munakata, Kaori

AU - Yamaguchi, Rui

AU - Imoto, Seiya

AU - Miyano, Satoru

AU - Mima, Hideki

AU - Watanabe, Kenji

AU - Mimura, Masaru

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In Kampo medicine, two different formulas are effective for treating dysmenorrhea - tokishakuyakusan and keishibukuryogan; however, the criteria by which specialists select the appropriate formula for each patient are not clear. We compared patients treated with tokishakuyakusan and those with keishibukuryogan and proposed a predictive model. The study included 168 primary and secondary dysmenorrhea patients who visited the Kampo Clinic at Keio University Hospital. We collected clinical data from 128 dysmenorrhea patients, compared the two patient groups and selected significantly different factors as potential predictors, and used logistic regression to establish a model. An external validation was performed using 40 dysmenorrhea patients. Lightheadedness, BMI <18.5, and a weak abdomen were significantly more frequent in the tokishakuyakusan group; tendency to sweat, heat intolerance, leg numbness, a cold sensation in the lower back, a strong abdomen, and paraumbilical tenderness and resistance were more frequent in the keishibukuryogan group. The final model fitted the data well. Internally estimated accuracy was 81.2%, and a leave-one-out cross-validation estimate of accuracy was 80.5%. External validation accuracy was 85.0%. We proposed a model for predicting the use of two Kampo formulas for dysmenorrhea, which should be validated in prospective trials.

AB - In Kampo medicine, two different formulas are effective for treating dysmenorrhea - tokishakuyakusan and keishibukuryogan; however, the criteria by which specialists select the appropriate formula for each patient are not clear. We compared patients treated with tokishakuyakusan and those with keishibukuryogan and proposed a predictive model. The study included 168 primary and secondary dysmenorrhea patients who visited the Kampo Clinic at Keio University Hospital. We collected clinical data from 128 dysmenorrhea patients, compared the two patient groups and selected significantly different factors as potential predictors, and used logistic regression to establish a model. An external validation was performed using 40 dysmenorrhea patients. Lightheadedness, BMI <18.5, and a weak abdomen were significantly more frequent in the tokishakuyakusan group; tendency to sweat, heat intolerance, leg numbness, a cold sensation in the lower back, a strong abdomen, and paraumbilical tenderness and resistance were more frequent in the keishibukuryogan group. The final model fitted the data well. Internally estimated accuracy was 81.2%, and a leave-one-out cross-validation estimate of accuracy was 80.5%. External validation accuracy was 85.0%. We proposed a model for predicting the use of two Kampo formulas for dysmenorrhea, which should be validated in prospective trials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960970980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960970980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2016/3159617

DO - 10.1155/2016/3159617

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84960970980

VL - 2016

JO - Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

JF - Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

SN - 1741-427X

M1 - 3159617

ER -