Abstract
Background: Aerosol spread is key to interpret the risk of viral contamination during clinical procedures such as esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). Installing an air purifier seems a legitimate strategy, but this has recently been questioned. Methods: Patients undergoing an HRM procedure at the Leuven University Hospital were included in this clinical study. All subjects had to wear a surgical mask which was only lowered beneath the nose during the placement and removal of the nasogastric catheter. The number of aerosol particles was measured by a Lasair® II Particle Counter to obtain data about different particles sizes: 0.3; 0.5; 1.0; 3.0; 5.0; and 10.0 µm. Measurements were done immediately before the placement and the removal of the HRM catheter, and one and 5 min after. A portable air purifier with high-efficiency particle air filters was installed in the hospital room. Key Results: Thirteen patients underwent a manometry examination. The amount of 0.3 µm-sized particles was unaffected during the whole procedure. The larger particle sizes (1.0; 3.0; 5.0; and 10.0 µm) decreased when the catheter was positioned, but not 0.5 µm. During the HRM measurements itself, these numbers decreased further. Yet, 1 min after catheter removal a significant elevation of particles was seen, which did not recover within 5 min. Conclusions & Interferences: Based on this study, there is no evidence that filtration systems reduce aerosol particles properly during a clinical investigation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e14227 |
Journal | Neurogastroenterology and Motility |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 Apr |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- COVID19
- aerosol
- air purifier
- nasogastric intubation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physiology
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
- Gastroenterology