The effects of argument preparation and timing of first offer on negotiators' cognitions and performance

Elizabeth A. Mannix, Ichiro Innami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate how argument preparation (self-only, self/counter) and the timing of the first offer (immediate, delayed) combine to affect negotiation performance. Subjects participated in a dyadic negotiation concerning the out-of-court settlement of a lawsuit. Subjects prepared by generating a list of arguments in support of their case (self-only), or by generating a list of arguments in support of their case accompanied by a list of counterarguments that they might expect from their opponent (self/counter). In the Immediate Offer condition, subjects began the negotiation with an exchange of written settlement offers. In the Delayed Offer condition, subjects began the negotiation with a discussion of the qualitative negotiation issues. It was proposed that negotiators who prepared both their own and counterarguments would be more flexible and that this effect would be increased by delaying the first offer. The results indicate that the effects of these variables are more complex than originally proposed, and reveal significant interactions with the negotiator's role in the conflict.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-362
Number of pages16
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1993 Nov
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

cognition
performance
lawsuit
Preparation
Cognition
interaction
Counterargument

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

The effects of argument preparation and timing of first offer on negotiators' cognitions and performance. / Mannix, Elizabeth A.; Innami, Ichiro.

In: Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 2, No. 4, 11.1993, p. 347-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1029c47ca2f4409dbb497e153ad7241b,
title = "The effects of argument preparation and timing of first offer on negotiators' cognitions and performance",
abstract = "We investigate how argument preparation (self-only, self/counter) and the timing of the first offer (immediate, delayed) combine to affect negotiation performance. Subjects participated in a dyadic negotiation concerning the out-of-court settlement of a lawsuit. Subjects prepared by generating a list of arguments in support of their case (self-only), or by generating a list of arguments in support of their case accompanied by a list of counterarguments that they might expect from their opponent (self/counter). In the Immediate Offer condition, subjects began the negotiation with an exchange of written settlement offers. In the Delayed Offer condition, subjects began the negotiation with a discussion of the qualitative negotiation issues. It was proposed that negotiators who prepared both their own and counterarguments would be more flexible and that this effect would be increased by delaying the first offer. The results indicate that the effects of these variables are more complex than originally proposed, and reveal significant interactions with the negotiator's role in the conflict.",
author = "Mannix, {Elizabeth A.} and Ichiro Innami",
year = "1993",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/BF01384488",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "347--362",
journal = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
issn = "0926-2644",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of argument preparation and timing of first offer on negotiators' cognitions and performance

AU - Mannix, Elizabeth A.

AU - Innami, Ichiro

PY - 1993/11

Y1 - 1993/11

N2 - We investigate how argument preparation (self-only, self/counter) and the timing of the first offer (immediate, delayed) combine to affect negotiation performance. Subjects participated in a dyadic negotiation concerning the out-of-court settlement of a lawsuit. Subjects prepared by generating a list of arguments in support of their case (self-only), or by generating a list of arguments in support of their case accompanied by a list of counterarguments that they might expect from their opponent (self/counter). In the Immediate Offer condition, subjects began the negotiation with an exchange of written settlement offers. In the Delayed Offer condition, subjects began the negotiation with a discussion of the qualitative negotiation issues. It was proposed that negotiators who prepared both their own and counterarguments would be more flexible and that this effect would be increased by delaying the first offer. The results indicate that the effects of these variables are more complex than originally proposed, and reveal significant interactions with the negotiator's role in the conflict.

AB - We investigate how argument preparation (self-only, self/counter) and the timing of the first offer (immediate, delayed) combine to affect negotiation performance. Subjects participated in a dyadic negotiation concerning the out-of-court settlement of a lawsuit. Subjects prepared by generating a list of arguments in support of their case (self-only), or by generating a list of arguments in support of their case accompanied by a list of counterarguments that they might expect from their opponent (self/counter). In the Immediate Offer condition, subjects began the negotiation with an exchange of written settlement offers. In the Delayed Offer condition, subjects began the negotiation with a discussion of the qualitative negotiation issues. It was proposed that negotiators who prepared both their own and counterarguments would be more flexible and that this effect would be increased by delaying the first offer. The results indicate that the effects of these variables are more complex than originally proposed, and reveal significant interactions with the negotiator's role in the conflict.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250073216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250073216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01384488

DO - 10.1007/BF01384488

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34250073216

VL - 2

SP - 347

EP - 362

JO - Group Decision and Negotiation

JF - Group Decision and Negotiation

SN - 0926-2644

IS - 4

ER -