The Effects of Limiting Instructions about Emotional Evidence Depend on Need for Cognition

Kayo Matsuo, Yuji Itoh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although limiting instructions are provided for specific evidence that may have a negative impact on jurors’ decision-making, there may be individual differences in the effectiveness of the instructions. The individual predisposition towards the enjoyment of cognitive activity is called need for cognition (NFC), and individuals high in NFC tend to seek out and engage in cognitive activity spontaneously. The present study examined the influence of NFC and limiting instructions about emotional evidence on mock jurors’ legal decision-making. The results showed that mock jurors who were lower in NFC were more likely to render a guilty decision than those higher in NFC, and that the tendency was more salient when the limiting instructions were presented compared with when they were not presented. Similar results were found in regard to sentencing decisions and arousal of anger. A partial mediation effect of anger was found between NFC and verdict decisions. The influence of NFC on the limiting instructions and legal decision-making as well as the effect of anger on the decision is discussed in relation to these results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Cognition
cognition
instruction
Anger
evidence
anger
Decision Making
decision making
Arousal
Individuality
mediation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

The Effects of Limiting Instructions about Emotional Evidence Depend on Need for Cognition. / Matsuo, Kayo; Itoh, Yuji.

In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 01.01.2017, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d88a5eacaab45b3b46e1e1ecf4a8524,
title = "The Effects of Limiting Instructions about Emotional Evidence Depend on Need for Cognition",
abstract = "Although limiting instructions are provided for specific evidence that may have a negative impact on jurors’ decision-making, there may be individual differences in the effectiveness of the instructions. The individual predisposition towards the enjoyment of cognitive activity is called need for cognition (NFC), and individuals high in NFC tend to seek out and engage in cognitive activity spontaneously. The present study examined the influence of NFC and limiting instructions about emotional evidence on mock jurors’ legal decision-making. The results showed that mock jurors who were lower in NFC were more likely to render a guilty decision than those higher in NFC, and that the tendency was more salient when the limiting instructions were presented compared with when they were not presented. Similar results were found in regard to sentencing decisions and arousal of anger. A partial mediation effect of anger was found between NFC and verdict decisions. The influence of NFC on the limiting instructions and legal decision-making as well as the effect of anger on the decision is discussed in relation to these results.",
author = "Kayo Matsuo and Yuji Itoh",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13218719.2016.1254588",
language = "English",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Psychiatry, Psychology and Law",
issn = "1321-8719",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Limiting Instructions about Emotional Evidence Depend on Need for Cognition

AU - Matsuo, Kayo

AU - Itoh, Yuji

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Although limiting instructions are provided for specific evidence that may have a negative impact on jurors’ decision-making, there may be individual differences in the effectiveness of the instructions. The individual predisposition towards the enjoyment of cognitive activity is called need for cognition (NFC), and individuals high in NFC tend to seek out and engage in cognitive activity spontaneously. The present study examined the influence of NFC and limiting instructions about emotional evidence on mock jurors’ legal decision-making. The results showed that mock jurors who were lower in NFC were more likely to render a guilty decision than those higher in NFC, and that the tendency was more salient when the limiting instructions were presented compared with when they were not presented. Similar results were found in regard to sentencing decisions and arousal of anger. A partial mediation effect of anger was found between NFC and verdict decisions. The influence of NFC on the limiting instructions and legal decision-making as well as the effect of anger on the decision is discussed in relation to these results.

AB - Although limiting instructions are provided for specific evidence that may have a negative impact on jurors’ decision-making, there may be individual differences in the effectiveness of the instructions. The individual predisposition towards the enjoyment of cognitive activity is called need for cognition (NFC), and individuals high in NFC tend to seek out and engage in cognitive activity spontaneously. The present study examined the influence of NFC and limiting instructions about emotional evidence on mock jurors’ legal decision-making. The results showed that mock jurors who were lower in NFC were more likely to render a guilty decision than those higher in NFC, and that the tendency was more salient when the limiting instructions were presented compared with when they were not presented. Similar results were found in regard to sentencing decisions and arousal of anger. A partial mediation effect of anger was found between NFC and verdict decisions. The influence of NFC on the limiting instructions and legal decision-making as well as the effect of anger on the decision is discussed in relation to these results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009765365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009765365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2016.1254588

DO - 10.1080/13218719.2016.1254588

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009765365

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

SN - 1321-8719

ER -