The Efficacy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Osama M A Ibrahim, Yukihiro Matsumoto, Murat Dogru, Enrique Sato Adan, Tais Hitomi Wakamatsu, Tateki Goto, Kazuno Negishi, Kazuo Tsubota

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, sensitivity and specificity of confocal microscopy (CM) parameters: meibomian gland (MG) acinar longest diameter (MGALD), MG acinar shortest diameter (MGASD), inflammatory cell density (ICD), and MG acinar unit density (MGAUD) in the diagnosis of MG dysfunction (MGD). Design: Prospective, controlled, single-center study. Participants: Twenty MGD patients (9 males, 11 females; mean age, 63.5±16.5 years) and 26 age- and gender-matched control subjects (13 males, 13 females; mean age, 53.2±15.7 years) were recruited. Methods: All subjects underwent slit-lamp examinations, tear film break-up time (BUT) measurements, assessment of tear evaporation rate from the ocular surface (TEROS), vital stainings, Schirmer test, meibography, MG expressibility, and CM of the MG. Data were compared between the 2 groups using the Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests. Main Outcome Measures: The correlation between the clinical findings of tear functions, vital staining scores, and the 4 CM parameters were tested by Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank test. Receiver operating characteristic curve technique was used to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values of CM parameters. Results: The mean tear film BUT, vital staining scores, TEROS values, MG expressibility, and MG dropout grades by meibography were significantly worse in MGD patients compared with controls (P<0.001). The mean values of the MGALD, MGASD, ICD, and MGAUD in MGD patients were significantly worse than those observed in the controls with CM. All CM parameters showed a strong, significant correlation with tear functions, ocular surface vital stainings, MG expressibility, and MG dropout grades. The cutoff values for MGALD, MGASD, ICD, and MGAUD in the diagnosis of MGD were 65 μm, 25 μm, 300 cells/mm2, and 70 glands/mm2, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values of these parameters under these cutoff values were 90% and 81% for MGALD, 86% and 96% for MGASD, 100% and 100% for ICD, 81% and 81% for MGAUD. Conclusions: Confocal microscopy has the potential to diagnose the simple MGD with high sensitivity and specificity. The CM-based diagnostic parameters correlated significantly and strongly with the status of the ocular surface disease. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-672
Number of pages8
JournalOphthalmology
Volume117
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Apr

Fingerprint

Meibomian Glands
Confocal Microscopy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tears
Cell Count
Staining and Labeling
Intravital Microscopy
Eye Diseases
Disclosure
Chi-Square Distribution
Nonparametric Statistics
ROC Curve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The Efficacy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. / Ibrahim, Osama M A; Matsumoto, Yukihiro; Dogru, Murat; Adan, Enrique Sato; Wakamatsu, Tais Hitomi; Goto, Tateki; Negishi, Kazuno; Tsubota, Kazuo.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 117, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 665-672.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ibrahim, Osama M A ; Matsumoto, Yukihiro ; Dogru, Murat ; Adan, Enrique Sato ; Wakamatsu, Tais Hitomi ; Goto, Tateki ; Negishi, Kazuno ; Tsubota, Kazuo. / The Efficacy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. In: Ophthalmology. 2010 ; Vol. 117, No. 4. pp. 665-672.
@article{513281dfa6714d42b45e8b5ac5db43e1,
title = "The Efficacy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, sensitivity and specificity of confocal microscopy (CM) parameters: meibomian gland (MG) acinar longest diameter (MGALD), MG acinar shortest diameter (MGASD), inflammatory cell density (ICD), and MG acinar unit density (MGAUD) in the diagnosis of MG dysfunction (MGD). Design: Prospective, controlled, single-center study. Participants: Twenty MGD patients (9 males, 11 females; mean age, 63.5±16.5 years) and 26 age- and gender-matched control subjects (13 males, 13 females; mean age, 53.2±15.7 years) were recruited. Methods: All subjects underwent slit-lamp examinations, tear film break-up time (BUT) measurements, assessment of tear evaporation rate from the ocular surface (TEROS), vital stainings, Schirmer test, meibography, MG expressibility, and CM of the MG. Data were compared between the 2 groups using the Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests. Main Outcome Measures: The correlation between the clinical findings of tear functions, vital staining scores, and the 4 CM parameters were tested by Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank test. Receiver operating characteristic curve technique was used to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values of CM parameters. Results: The mean tear film BUT, vital staining scores, TEROS values, MG expressibility, and MG dropout grades by meibography were significantly worse in MGD patients compared with controls (P<0.001). The mean values of the MGALD, MGASD, ICD, and MGAUD in MGD patients were significantly worse than those observed in the controls with CM. All CM parameters showed a strong, significant correlation with tear functions, ocular surface vital stainings, MG expressibility, and MG dropout grades. The cutoff values for MGALD, MGASD, ICD, and MGAUD in the diagnosis of MGD were 65 μm, 25 μm, 300 cells/mm2, and 70 glands/mm2, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values of these parameters under these cutoff values were 90{\%} and 81{\%} for MGALD, 86{\%} and 96{\%} for MGASD, 100{\%} and 100{\%} for ICD, 81{\%} and 81{\%} for MGAUD. Conclusions: Confocal microscopy has the potential to diagnose the simple MGD with high sensitivity and specificity. The CM-based diagnostic parameters correlated significantly and strongly with the status of the ocular surface disease. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.",
author = "Ibrahim, {Osama M A} and Yukihiro Matsumoto and Murat Dogru and Adan, {Enrique Sato} and Wakamatsu, {Tais Hitomi} and Tateki Goto and Kazuno Negishi and Kazuo Tsubota",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.029",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "665--672",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Efficacy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

AU - Ibrahim, Osama M A

AU - Matsumoto, Yukihiro

AU - Dogru, Murat

AU - Adan, Enrique Sato

AU - Wakamatsu, Tais Hitomi

AU - Goto, Tateki

AU - Negishi, Kazuno

AU - Tsubota, Kazuo

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, sensitivity and specificity of confocal microscopy (CM) parameters: meibomian gland (MG) acinar longest diameter (MGALD), MG acinar shortest diameter (MGASD), inflammatory cell density (ICD), and MG acinar unit density (MGAUD) in the diagnosis of MG dysfunction (MGD). Design: Prospective, controlled, single-center study. Participants: Twenty MGD patients (9 males, 11 females; mean age, 63.5±16.5 years) and 26 age- and gender-matched control subjects (13 males, 13 females; mean age, 53.2±15.7 years) were recruited. Methods: All subjects underwent slit-lamp examinations, tear film break-up time (BUT) measurements, assessment of tear evaporation rate from the ocular surface (TEROS), vital stainings, Schirmer test, meibography, MG expressibility, and CM of the MG. Data were compared between the 2 groups using the Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests. Main Outcome Measures: The correlation between the clinical findings of tear functions, vital staining scores, and the 4 CM parameters were tested by Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank test. Receiver operating characteristic curve technique was used to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values of CM parameters. Results: The mean tear film BUT, vital staining scores, TEROS values, MG expressibility, and MG dropout grades by meibography were significantly worse in MGD patients compared with controls (P<0.001). The mean values of the MGALD, MGASD, ICD, and MGAUD in MGD patients were significantly worse than those observed in the controls with CM. All CM parameters showed a strong, significant correlation with tear functions, ocular surface vital stainings, MG expressibility, and MG dropout grades. The cutoff values for MGALD, MGASD, ICD, and MGAUD in the diagnosis of MGD were 65 μm, 25 μm, 300 cells/mm2, and 70 glands/mm2, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values of these parameters under these cutoff values were 90% and 81% for MGALD, 86% and 96% for MGASD, 100% and 100% for ICD, 81% and 81% for MGAUD. Conclusions: Confocal microscopy has the potential to diagnose the simple MGD with high sensitivity and specificity. The CM-based diagnostic parameters correlated significantly and strongly with the status of the ocular surface disease. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, sensitivity and specificity of confocal microscopy (CM) parameters: meibomian gland (MG) acinar longest diameter (MGALD), MG acinar shortest diameter (MGASD), inflammatory cell density (ICD), and MG acinar unit density (MGAUD) in the diagnosis of MG dysfunction (MGD). Design: Prospective, controlled, single-center study. Participants: Twenty MGD patients (9 males, 11 females; mean age, 63.5±16.5 years) and 26 age- and gender-matched control subjects (13 males, 13 females; mean age, 53.2±15.7 years) were recruited. Methods: All subjects underwent slit-lamp examinations, tear film break-up time (BUT) measurements, assessment of tear evaporation rate from the ocular surface (TEROS), vital stainings, Schirmer test, meibography, MG expressibility, and CM of the MG. Data were compared between the 2 groups using the Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests. Main Outcome Measures: The correlation between the clinical findings of tear functions, vital staining scores, and the 4 CM parameters were tested by Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank test. Receiver operating characteristic curve technique was used to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values of CM parameters. Results: The mean tear film BUT, vital staining scores, TEROS values, MG expressibility, and MG dropout grades by meibography were significantly worse in MGD patients compared with controls (P<0.001). The mean values of the MGALD, MGASD, ICD, and MGAUD in MGD patients were significantly worse than those observed in the controls with CM. All CM parameters showed a strong, significant correlation with tear functions, ocular surface vital stainings, MG expressibility, and MG dropout grades. The cutoff values for MGALD, MGASD, ICD, and MGAUD in the diagnosis of MGD were 65 μm, 25 μm, 300 cells/mm2, and 70 glands/mm2, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values of these parameters under these cutoff values were 90% and 81% for MGALD, 86% and 96% for MGASD, 100% and 100% for ICD, 81% and 81% for MGAUD. Conclusions: Confocal microscopy has the potential to diagnose the simple MGD with high sensitivity and specificity. The CM-based diagnostic parameters correlated significantly and strongly with the status of the ocular surface disease. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949658433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949658433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.029

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 20189653

AN - SCOPUS:77949658433

VL - 117

SP - 665

EP - 672

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 4

ER -