The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion: Perceptual load versus feature-based attention

Shuichiro Taya, Wendy J. Adams, Erich W. Graf, Nilli Lavie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We tested contrasting predictions derived from perceptual load theory and from recent feature-based selection accounts. Observers viewed moving, colored stimuli and performed low or high load tasks associated with one stimulus feature, either color or motion. The resultant motion aftereffect (MAE) was used to evaluate attentional allocation. We found that task-irrelevant visual features received less attention than co-localized task-relevant features of the same objects. Moreover, when color and motion features were co-localized yet perceived to belong to two distinct surfaces, feature-based selection was further increased at the expense of object-based co-selection. Load theory predicts that the MAE for task-irrelevant motion would be reduced with a higher load color task. However, this was not seen for co-localized features; perceptual load only modulated the MAE for task-irrelevant motion when this was spatially separated from the attended color location. Our results suggest that perceptual load effects are mediated by spatial selection and do not generalize to the feature domain. Feature-based selection operates to suppress processing of task-irrelevant, co-localized features, irrespective of perceptual load.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume9
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Color

Keywords

  • Feature-based attention
  • Motion aftereffects
  • Object-based attention
  • Perceptual load
  • Space-based attention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion : Perceptual load versus feature-based attention. / Taya, Shuichiro; Adams, Wendy J.; Graf, Erich W.; Lavie, Nilli.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 9, No. 12, 2009, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taya, Shuichiro ; Adams, Wendy J. ; Graf, Erich W. ; Lavie, Nilli. / The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion : Perceptual load versus feature-based attention. In: Journal of Vision. 2009 ; Vol. 9, No. 12. pp. 1-10.
@article{036466dd4c7f47c2a200a50d374b2ff4,
title = "The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion: Perceptual load versus feature-based attention",
abstract = "We tested contrasting predictions derived from perceptual load theory and from recent feature-based selection accounts. Observers viewed moving, colored stimuli and performed low or high load tasks associated with one stimulus feature, either color or motion. The resultant motion aftereffect (MAE) was used to evaluate attentional allocation. We found that task-irrelevant visual features received less attention than co-localized task-relevant features of the same objects. Moreover, when color and motion features were co-localized yet perceived to belong to two distinct surfaces, feature-based selection was further increased at the expense of object-based co-selection. Load theory predicts that the MAE for task-irrelevant motion would be reduced with a higher load color task. However, this was not seen for co-localized features; perceptual load only modulated the MAE for task-irrelevant motion when this was spatially separated from the attended color location. Our results suggest that perceptual load effects are mediated by spatial selection and do not generalize to the feature domain. Feature-based selection operates to suppress processing of task-irrelevant, co-localized features, irrespective of perceptual load.",
keywords = "Feature-based attention, Motion aftereffects, Object-based attention, Perceptual load, Space-based attention",
author = "Shuichiro Taya and Adams, {Wendy J.} and Graf, {Erich W.} and Nilli Lavie",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1167/9.12.1",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion

T2 - Perceptual load versus feature-based attention

AU - Taya, Shuichiro

AU - Adams, Wendy J.

AU - Graf, Erich W.

AU - Lavie, Nilli

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - We tested contrasting predictions derived from perceptual load theory and from recent feature-based selection accounts. Observers viewed moving, colored stimuli and performed low or high load tasks associated with one stimulus feature, either color or motion. The resultant motion aftereffect (MAE) was used to evaluate attentional allocation. We found that task-irrelevant visual features received less attention than co-localized task-relevant features of the same objects. Moreover, when color and motion features were co-localized yet perceived to belong to two distinct surfaces, feature-based selection was further increased at the expense of object-based co-selection. Load theory predicts that the MAE for task-irrelevant motion would be reduced with a higher load color task. However, this was not seen for co-localized features; perceptual load only modulated the MAE for task-irrelevant motion when this was spatially separated from the attended color location. Our results suggest that perceptual load effects are mediated by spatial selection and do not generalize to the feature domain. Feature-based selection operates to suppress processing of task-irrelevant, co-localized features, irrespective of perceptual load.

AB - We tested contrasting predictions derived from perceptual load theory and from recent feature-based selection accounts. Observers viewed moving, colored stimuli and performed low or high load tasks associated with one stimulus feature, either color or motion. The resultant motion aftereffect (MAE) was used to evaluate attentional allocation. We found that task-irrelevant visual features received less attention than co-localized task-relevant features of the same objects. Moreover, when color and motion features were co-localized yet perceived to belong to two distinct surfaces, feature-based selection was further increased at the expense of object-based co-selection. Load theory predicts that the MAE for task-irrelevant motion would be reduced with a higher load color task. However, this was not seen for co-localized features; perceptual load only modulated the MAE for task-irrelevant motion when this was spatially separated from the attended color location. Our results suggest that perceptual load effects are mediated by spatial selection and do not generalize to the feature domain. Feature-based selection operates to suppress processing of task-irrelevant, co-localized features, irrespective of perceptual load.

KW - Feature-based attention

KW - Motion aftereffects

KW - Object-based attention

KW - Perceptual load

KW - Space-based attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950355907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950355907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/9.12.1

DO - 10.1167/9.12.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 20053103

AN - SCOPUS:77950355907

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 12

ER -