The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

Kari Chansky, Frank C. Detterbeck, Andrew G. Nicholson, Valerie W. Rusch, Eric Vallières, Patti Groome, Catherine Kennedy, Mark Krasnik, Michael Peake, Lynn Shemanski, Vanessa Bolejack, John J. Crowley, Hisao Asamura, Ramón Rami-Porta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Revisions to the TNM stage classifications for lung cancer, informed by the international database (N = 94,708) of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, need external validation. The objective was to externally validate the revisions by using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) of the American College of Surgeons. Methods: Cases presenting from 2000 through 2012 were drawn from the NCDB and reclassified according to the eighth edition stage classification. Clinically and pathologically staged subsets of NSCLC were analyzed separately. The T, N, and overall TNM classifications were evaluated according to clinical, pathologic, and "best" stage (N = 780,294). Multivariate analyses were carried out to adjust for various confounding factors. A combined analysis of the NSCLC cases from both databases was performed to explore differences in overall survival prognosis between the two databases. Results: The databases differed in terms of key factors related to data source. Survival was greater in the IASLC database for all stage categories. However, the eighth edition TNM stage classification system demonstrated consistent ability to discriminate TNM categories and stage groups for clinical and pathologic stage. Conclusions: The IASLC revisions made for the eighth edition of lung cancer staging are validated by this analysis of the NCDB database by the ordering, statistical differences, and homogeneity within stage groups and by the consistency within analyses of specific cohorts.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2017 Feb 3

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Staging
Lung Neoplasms
Databases
Neoplasms
Information Storage and Retrieval
Cohort Studies
Multivariate Analysis

Keywords

  • AJCC
  • Lung cancer
  • National Cancer Database
  • Staging
  • UICC
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project : External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer. / Chansky, Kari; Detterbeck, Frank C.; Nicholson, Andrew G.; Rusch, Valerie W.; Vallières, Eric; Groome, Patti; Kennedy, Catherine; Krasnik, Mark; Peake, Michael; Shemanski, Lynn; Bolejack, Vanessa; Crowley, John J.; Asamura, Hisao; Rami-Porta, Ramón.

In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 03.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chansky, K, Detterbeck, FC, Nicholson, AG, Rusch, VW, Vallières, E, Groome, P, Kennedy, C, Krasnik, M, Peake, M, Shemanski, L, Bolejack, V, Crowley, JJ, Asamura, H & Rami-Porta, R 2017, 'The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer', Journal of Thoracic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.011
Chansky, Kari ; Detterbeck, Frank C. ; Nicholson, Andrew G. ; Rusch, Valerie W. ; Vallières, Eric ; Groome, Patti ; Kennedy, Catherine ; Krasnik, Mark ; Peake, Michael ; Shemanski, Lynn ; Bolejack, Vanessa ; Crowley, John J. ; Asamura, Hisao ; Rami-Porta, Ramón. / The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project : External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer. In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2017.
@article{532b1328ceee47afb89ce3ea3c2ff336,
title = "The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer",
abstract = "Introduction: Revisions to the TNM stage classifications for lung cancer, informed by the international database (N = 94,708) of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, need external validation. The objective was to externally validate the revisions by using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) of the American College of Surgeons. Methods: Cases presenting from 2000 through 2012 were drawn from the NCDB and reclassified according to the eighth edition stage classification. Clinically and pathologically staged subsets of NSCLC were analyzed separately. The T, N, and overall TNM classifications were evaluated according to clinical, pathologic, and {"}best{"} stage (N = 780,294). Multivariate analyses were carried out to adjust for various confounding factors. A combined analysis of the NSCLC cases from both databases was performed to explore differences in overall survival prognosis between the two databases. Results: The databases differed in terms of key factors related to data source. Survival was greater in the IASLC database for all stage categories. However, the eighth edition TNM stage classification system demonstrated consistent ability to discriminate TNM categories and stage groups for clinical and pathologic stage. Conclusions: The IASLC revisions made for the eighth edition of lung cancer staging are validated by this analysis of the NCDB database by the ordering, statistical differences, and homogeneity within stage groups and by the consistency within analyses of specific cohorts.",
keywords = "AJCC, Lung cancer, National Cancer Database, Staging, UICC, Validation",
author = "Kari Chansky and Detterbeck, {Frank C.} and Nicholson, {Andrew G.} and Rusch, {Valerie W.} and Eric Valli{\`e}res and Patti Groome and Catherine Kennedy and Mark Krasnik and Michael Peake and Lynn Shemanski and Vanessa Bolejack and Crowley, {John J.} and Hisao Asamura and Ram{\'o}n Rami-Porta",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.011",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic Oncology",
issn = "1556-0864",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project

T2 - External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

AU - Chansky, Kari

AU - Detterbeck, Frank C.

AU - Nicholson, Andrew G.

AU - Rusch, Valerie W.

AU - Vallières, Eric

AU - Groome, Patti

AU - Kennedy, Catherine

AU - Krasnik, Mark

AU - Peake, Michael

AU - Shemanski, Lynn

AU - Bolejack, Vanessa

AU - Crowley, John J.

AU - Asamura, Hisao

AU - Rami-Porta, Ramón

PY - 2017/2/3

Y1 - 2017/2/3

N2 - Introduction: Revisions to the TNM stage classifications for lung cancer, informed by the international database (N = 94,708) of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, need external validation. The objective was to externally validate the revisions by using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) of the American College of Surgeons. Methods: Cases presenting from 2000 through 2012 were drawn from the NCDB and reclassified according to the eighth edition stage classification. Clinically and pathologically staged subsets of NSCLC were analyzed separately. The T, N, and overall TNM classifications were evaluated according to clinical, pathologic, and "best" stage (N = 780,294). Multivariate analyses were carried out to adjust for various confounding factors. A combined analysis of the NSCLC cases from both databases was performed to explore differences in overall survival prognosis between the two databases. Results: The databases differed in terms of key factors related to data source. Survival was greater in the IASLC database for all stage categories. However, the eighth edition TNM stage classification system demonstrated consistent ability to discriminate TNM categories and stage groups for clinical and pathologic stage. Conclusions: The IASLC revisions made for the eighth edition of lung cancer staging are validated by this analysis of the NCDB database by the ordering, statistical differences, and homogeneity within stage groups and by the consistency within analyses of specific cohorts.

AB - Introduction: Revisions to the TNM stage classifications for lung cancer, informed by the international database (N = 94,708) of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, need external validation. The objective was to externally validate the revisions by using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) of the American College of Surgeons. Methods: Cases presenting from 2000 through 2012 were drawn from the NCDB and reclassified according to the eighth edition stage classification. Clinically and pathologically staged subsets of NSCLC were analyzed separately. The T, N, and overall TNM classifications were evaluated according to clinical, pathologic, and "best" stage (N = 780,294). Multivariate analyses were carried out to adjust for various confounding factors. A combined analysis of the NSCLC cases from both databases was performed to explore differences in overall survival prognosis between the two databases. Results: The databases differed in terms of key factors related to data source. Survival was greater in the IASLC database for all stage categories. However, the eighth edition TNM stage classification system demonstrated consistent ability to discriminate TNM categories and stage groups for clinical and pathologic stage. Conclusions: The IASLC revisions made for the eighth edition of lung cancer staging are validated by this analysis of the NCDB database by the ordering, statistical differences, and homogeneity within stage groups and by the consistency within analyses of specific cohorts.

KW - AJCC

KW - Lung cancer

KW - National Cancer Database

KW - Staging

KW - UICC

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019863693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019863693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 28461257

AN - SCOPUS:85019863693

JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology

JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology

SN - 1556-0864

ER -