The Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test is effective compared to the clock-drawing test for detecting patients with mild Alzheimer's disease

Yasushi Moriyama, Aihide Yoshino, Kaori Yamanaka, Motoichiro Kato, Taro Muramatsu, Masaru Mimura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test (RDST-J) and the clock-drawing test (CDT) are both brief psychometric screening tools used to detect the severity of Alzheimer's disease. It remains unclear, however, which is more effective when screening for mild Alzheimer's disease. Methods: We administered the RDST-J and CDT to 250 patients with very mild to severe Alzheimer's disease and to 49 healthy volunteers. Patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 12-26 had Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores from 0.5 to 3. Patients were divided into four groups according to CDR score. We performed one-way factorial anova between the four groups and control subjects based on the CDT and RDST-J scores. Results: Data analysis revealed that RDST-J could distinguish patients with CDR 0.5 from the controls, but CDT could not. Furthermore, the sensitivity of a RDST-J score ≥8 was 57.1%, with a specificity of 81.0%, and the sensitivity of a RDST-J score ≥9 was 79.6%, with a specificity of 55.1% for discriminating CDR 0.5 from controls. Conclusions: RDST-J is a more effective tool than CDT for distinguishing CDR 0.5 from controls.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychogeriatrics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

Dementia
Alzheimer Disease
Psychometrics
Healthy Volunteers
Sensitivity and Specificity
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Category fluency task
  • Clock-drawing test
  • Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test
  • Number-transcoding task

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Gerontology

Cite this

@article{75c572e97221413e9000710f2d5e78e9,
title = "The Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test is effective compared to the clock-drawing test for detecting patients with mild Alzheimer's disease",
abstract = "Background: The Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test (RDST-J) and the clock-drawing test (CDT) are both brief psychometric screening tools used to detect the severity of Alzheimer's disease. It remains unclear, however, which is more effective when screening for mild Alzheimer's disease. Methods: We administered the RDST-J and CDT to 250 patients with very mild to severe Alzheimer's disease and to 49 healthy volunteers. Patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 12-26 had Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores from 0.5 to 3. Patients were divided into four groups according to CDR score. We performed one-way factorial anova between the four groups and control subjects based on the CDT and RDST-J scores. Results: Data analysis revealed that RDST-J could distinguish patients with CDR 0.5 from the controls, but CDT could not. Furthermore, the sensitivity of a RDST-J score ≥8 was 57.1{\%}, with a specificity of 81.0{\%}, and the sensitivity of a RDST-J score ≥9 was 79.6{\%}, with a specificity of 55.1{\%} for discriminating CDR 0.5 from controls. Conclusions: RDST-J is a more effective tool than CDT for distinguishing CDR 0.5 from controls.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Category fluency task, Clock-drawing test, Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test, Number-transcoding task",
author = "Yasushi Moriyama and Aihide Yoshino and Kaori Yamanaka and Motoichiro Kato and Taro Muramatsu and Masaru Mimura",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/psyg.12144",
language = "English",
journal = "Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1346-3500",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test is effective compared to the clock-drawing test for detecting patients with mild Alzheimer's disease

AU - Moriyama, Yasushi

AU - Yoshino, Aihide

AU - Yamanaka, Kaori

AU - Kato, Motoichiro

AU - Muramatsu, Taro

AU - Mimura, Masaru

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: The Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test (RDST-J) and the clock-drawing test (CDT) are both brief psychometric screening tools used to detect the severity of Alzheimer's disease. It remains unclear, however, which is more effective when screening for mild Alzheimer's disease. Methods: We administered the RDST-J and CDT to 250 patients with very mild to severe Alzheimer's disease and to 49 healthy volunteers. Patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 12-26 had Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores from 0.5 to 3. Patients were divided into four groups according to CDR score. We performed one-way factorial anova between the four groups and control subjects based on the CDT and RDST-J scores. Results: Data analysis revealed that RDST-J could distinguish patients with CDR 0.5 from the controls, but CDT could not. Furthermore, the sensitivity of a RDST-J score ≥8 was 57.1%, with a specificity of 81.0%, and the sensitivity of a RDST-J score ≥9 was 79.6%, with a specificity of 55.1% for discriminating CDR 0.5 from controls. Conclusions: RDST-J is a more effective tool than CDT for distinguishing CDR 0.5 from controls.

AB - Background: The Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test (RDST-J) and the clock-drawing test (CDT) are both brief psychometric screening tools used to detect the severity of Alzheimer's disease. It remains unclear, however, which is more effective when screening for mild Alzheimer's disease. Methods: We administered the RDST-J and CDT to 250 patients with very mild to severe Alzheimer's disease and to 49 healthy volunteers. Patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 12-26 had Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores from 0.5 to 3. Patients were divided into four groups according to CDR score. We performed one-way factorial anova between the four groups and control subjects based on the CDT and RDST-J scores. Results: Data analysis revealed that RDST-J could distinguish patients with CDR 0.5 from the controls, but CDT could not. Furthermore, the sensitivity of a RDST-J score ≥8 was 57.1%, with a specificity of 81.0%, and the sensitivity of a RDST-J score ≥9 was 79.6%, with a specificity of 55.1% for discriminating CDR 0.5 from controls. Conclusions: RDST-J is a more effective tool than CDT for distinguishing CDR 0.5 from controls.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Category fluency task

KW - Clock-drawing test

KW - Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test

KW - Number-transcoding task

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937791109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937791109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/psyg.12144

DO - 10.1111/psyg.12144

M3 - Article

C2 - 26211455

AN - SCOPUS:84937791109

JO - Psychogeriatrics

JF - Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1346-3500

ER -