TY - JOUR
T1 - The power-integrated discriminant improvement
T2 - An accurate measure of the incremental predictive value of additional biomarkers
AU - Hayashi, Kenichi
AU - Eguchi, Shinto
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Dr Yasuhiko Sakata, Dr Daisaku Nakatani, and Dr Yasushi Sakata for permission to use the dataset in the work of Hara et al. The authors would also like to acknowledge the associate editor and anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions that served to materially improve the manuscript. Kenichi Hayashi is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research) under grant 15K15950.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2019/6/30
Y1 - 2019/6/30
N2 - The predictive performance of biomarkers is a central concern in biomedical research. This is often evaluated by comparing two statistical models: a “new” model incorporating additional biomarkers and an “old” model without them. In 2008, the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was proposed for cases when the response variable is binary, and it is now widely applied as a promising alternative to conventional measures, such as the difference of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. However, the IDI can erroneously identify a significant improvement in the new model even if no additional information has been provided by new biomarkers. In order to overcome problems with existing measures, in this study, we propose the power-IDI as a measure of incremental predictive value. Our study explains why the IDI cannot avoid false detection of apparent improvements in a new model and we show that our proposed measure is better able to capture improvements in prediction. Numerical simulations and examples using real empirical data reveal that the power-IDI is not only more powerful but also incurs fewer false detections of improvement.
AB - The predictive performance of biomarkers is a central concern in biomedical research. This is often evaluated by comparing two statistical models: a “new” model incorporating additional biomarkers and an “old” model without them. In 2008, the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was proposed for cases when the response variable is binary, and it is now widely applied as a promising alternative to conventional measures, such as the difference of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. However, the IDI can erroneously identify a significant improvement in the new model even if no additional information has been provided by new biomarkers. In order to overcome problems with existing measures, in this study, we propose the power-IDI as a measure of incremental predictive value. Our study explains why the IDI cannot avoid false detection of apparent improvements in a new model and we show that our proposed measure is better able to capture improvements in prediction. Numerical simulations and examples using real empirical data reveal that the power-IDI is not only more powerful but also incurs fewer false detections of improvement.
KW - Bayes-risk consistency
KW - area under the ROC curve
KW - fisher consistency
KW - integrated discrimination improvement
KW - logistic regression
KW - net reclassification index
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062767081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062767081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/sim.8135
DO - 10.1002/sim.8135
M3 - Article
C2 - 30859601
AN - SCOPUS:85062767081
SN - 0277-6715
VL - 38
SP - 2589
EP - 2604
JO - Statistics in Medicine
JF - Statistics in Medicine
IS - 14
ER -