The process of collecting and evaluating evidences for the development of Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, Japan College of Rheumatology 2014: Utilization of GRADE approach

Masayo Kojima, Takeo Nakayama, Yutaka Kawahito, Yuko Kaneko, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, Shintaro Hirata, Yohei Seto, Hirahito Endo, Hiromu Ito, Toshihisa Kojima, Keiichiro Nishida, Isao Matsushita, Kiichiro Tsutani, Ataru Igarashi, Naoyuki Kamatani, Mieko Hasegawa, Nobuyuki Miyasaka, Hisashi Yamanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To describe the process of collecting and evaluating evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for rheumatologists in Japan. Methods. The task force comprised rheumatologists, epidemiologists, health economists, and patients. First, the critical outcomes were determined according to a three-round Delphi method, and eight topics with 88 clinical questions (CQs) were formulated. A systematic review of CQs was conducted using the Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Japana Centra Revvo Medicina (2003-2012). A questionnaire survey and focus group interview were performed to capture the patients' values and preferences. Data from the National Health Insurance drug price list and product information provided by pharmaceutical companies were collected to evaluate drug cost and safety. The GRADE approach was used to describe the evidence quality and determine the strength of recommendations. Recommendations were developed using a modified Delphi method by a multidisciplinary panel including patients. Results. Eight meetings and frequent e-mail communications were conducted to draft a quality assessment of evidence and recommendations. For 88 CQs, recommendation statements were determined. Conclusions. Using the GRADE approach, new CPGs successfully addressed important clinical issues for treating RA patients. Timely updating of recommendations should be routinely considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-179
Number of pages5
JournalModern Rheumatology
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Mar 3

Fingerprint

Rheumatology
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Japan
Guidelines
Practice Guidelines
Drug Costs
Patient Preference
National Health Programs
Postal Service
Advisory Committees
Focus Groups
MEDLINE
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Communication
Databases
Interviews
Safety
Health
Rheumatologists

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • GRADE
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Cite this

The process of collecting and evaluating evidences for the development of Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, Japan College of Rheumatology 2014 : Utilization of GRADE approach. / Kojima, Masayo; Nakayama, Takeo; Kawahito, Yutaka; Kaneko, Yuko; Kishimoto, Mitsumasa; Hirata, Shintaro; Seto, Yohei; Endo, Hirahito; Ito, Hiromu; Kojima, Toshihisa; Nishida, Keiichiro; Matsushita, Isao; Tsutani, Kiichiro; Igarashi, Ataru; Kamatani, Naoyuki; Hasegawa, Mieko; Miyasaka, Nobuyuki; Yamanaka, Hisashi.

In: Modern Rheumatology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 03.03.2016, p. 175-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kojima, M, Nakayama, T, Kawahito, Y, Kaneko, Y, Kishimoto, M, Hirata, S, Seto, Y, Endo, H, Ito, H, Kojima, T, Nishida, K, Matsushita, I, Tsutani, K, Igarashi, A, Kamatani, N, Hasegawa, M, Miyasaka, N & Yamanaka, H 2016, 'The process of collecting and evaluating evidences for the development of Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, Japan College of Rheumatology 2014: Utilization of GRADE approach', Modern Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 175-179. https://doi.org/10.3109/14397595.2015.1069474
Kojima, Masayo ; Nakayama, Takeo ; Kawahito, Yutaka ; Kaneko, Yuko ; Kishimoto, Mitsumasa ; Hirata, Shintaro ; Seto, Yohei ; Endo, Hirahito ; Ito, Hiromu ; Kojima, Toshihisa ; Nishida, Keiichiro ; Matsushita, Isao ; Tsutani, Kiichiro ; Igarashi, Ataru ; Kamatani, Naoyuki ; Hasegawa, Mieko ; Miyasaka, Nobuyuki ; Yamanaka, Hisashi. / The process of collecting and evaluating evidences for the development of Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, Japan College of Rheumatology 2014 : Utilization of GRADE approach. In: Modern Rheumatology. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 175-179.
@article{3fadd16b544b4421a8105268c6456622,
title = "The process of collecting and evaluating evidences for the development of Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, Japan College of Rheumatology 2014: Utilization of GRADE approach",
abstract = "Objectives. To describe the process of collecting and evaluating evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for rheumatologists in Japan. Methods. The task force comprised rheumatologists, epidemiologists, health economists, and patients. First, the critical outcomes were determined according to a three-round Delphi method, and eight topics with 88 clinical questions (CQs) were formulated. A systematic review of CQs was conducted using the Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Japana Centra Revvo Medicina (2003-2012). A questionnaire survey and focus group interview were performed to capture the patients' values and preferences. Data from the National Health Insurance drug price list and product information provided by pharmaceutical companies were collected to evaluate drug cost and safety. The GRADE approach was used to describe the evidence quality and determine the strength of recommendations. Recommendations were developed using a modified Delphi method by a multidisciplinary panel including patients. Results. Eight meetings and frequent e-mail communications were conducted to draft a quality assessment of evidence and recommendations. For 88 CQs, recommendation statements were determined. Conclusions. Using the GRADE approach, new CPGs successfully addressed important clinical issues for treating RA patients. Timely updating of recommendations should be routinely considered.",
keywords = "Clinical practice guidelines, GRADE, Rheumatoid arthritis, Systematic review",
author = "Masayo Kojima and Takeo Nakayama and Yutaka Kawahito and Yuko Kaneko and Mitsumasa Kishimoto and Shintaro Hirata and Yohei Seto and Hirahito Endo and Hiromu Ito and Toshihisa Kojima and Keiichiro Nishida and Isao Matsushita and Kiichiro Tsutani and Ataru Igarashi and Naoyuki Kamatani and Mieko Hasegawa and Nobuyuki Miyasaka and Hisashi Yamanaka",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.3109/14397595.2015.1069474",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "175--179",
journal = "Modern Rheumatology",
issn = "1439-7595",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The process of collecting and evaluating evidences for the development of Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, Japan College of Rheumatology 2014

T2 - Utilization of GRADE approach

AU - Kojima, Masayo

AU - Nakayama, Takeo

AU - Kawahito, Yutaka

AU - Kaneko, Yuko

AU - Kishimoto, Mitsumasa

AU - Hirata, Shintaro

AU - Seto, Yohei

AU - Endo, Hirahito

AU - Ito, Hiromu

AU - Kojima, Toshihisa

AU - Nishida, Keiichiro

AU - Matsushita, Isao

AU - Tsutani, Kiichiro

AU - Igarashi, Ataru

AU - Kamatani, Naoyuki

AU - Hasegawa, Mieko

AU - Miyasaka, Nobuyuki

AU - Yamanaka, Hisashi

PY - 2016/3/3

Y1 - 2016/3/3

N2 - Objectives. To describe the process of collecting and evaluating evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for rheumatologists in Japan. Methods. The task force comprised rheumatologists, epidemiologists, health economists, and patients. First, the critical outcomes were determined according to a three-round Delphi method, and eight topics with 88 clinical questions (CQs) were formulated. A systematic review of CQs was conducted using the Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Japana Centra Revvo Medicina (2003-2012). A questionnaire survey and focus group interview were performed to capture the patients' values and preferences. Data from the National Health Insurance drug price list and product information provided by pharmaceutical companies were collected to evaluate drug cost and safety. The GRADE approach was used to describe the evidence quality and determine the strength of recommendations. Recommendations were developed using a modified Delphi method by a multidisciplinary panel including patients. Results. Eight meetings and frequent e-mail communications were conducted to draft a quality assessment of evidence and recommendations. For 88 CQs, recommendation statements were determined. Conclusions. Using the GRADE approach, new CPGs successfully addressed important clinical issues for treating RA patients. Timely updating of recommendations should be routinely considered.

AB - Objectives. To describe the process of collecting and evaluating evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for rheumatologists in Japan. Methods. The task force comprised rheumatologists, epidemiologists, health economists, and patients. First, the critical outcomes were determined according to a three-round Delphi method, and eight topics with 88 clinical questions (CQs) were formulated. A systematic review of CQs was conducted using the Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Japana Centra Revvo Medicina (2003-2012). A questionnaire survey and focus group interview were performed to capture the patients' values and preferences. Data from the National Health Insurance drug price list and product information provided by pharmaceutical companies were collected to evaluate drug cost and safety. The GRADE approach was used to describe the evidence quality and determine the strength of recommendations. Recommendations were developed using a modified Delphi method by a multidisciplinary panel including patients. Results. Eight meetings and frequent e-mail communications were conducted to draft a quality assessment of evidence and recommendations. For 88 CQs, recommendation statements were determined. Conclusions. Using the GRADE approach, new CPGs successfully addressed important clinical issues for treating RA patients. Timely updating of recommendations should be routinely considered.

KW - Clinical practice guidelines

KW - GRADE

KW - Rheumatoid arthritis

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959466715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959466715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14397595.2015.1069474

DO - 10.3109/14397595.2015.1069474

M3 - Article

C2 - 26140466

AN - SCOPUS:84959466715

VL - 26

SP - 175

EP - 179

JO - Modern Rheumatology

JF - Modern Rheumatology

SN - 1439-7595

IS - 2

ER -