[The use of operational criteria for evaluations of mental competency].

Hiroki Kocha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Today, either the DSM-IV or the ICD-10 is generally used for forensic purposes, especially for evaluations of mental competency. The use of operational criteria, such as the DSM-IV, in forensic settings has some risks. Here, these risks, as well as the advantages of operational criteria and precautions for their use, are discussed. Compared with the DSM-IV, the ICD-10 is preferred because this tool is less likely to complicate evaluations of the mental status of a criminal at the time of the crime when sufficient information is not available to make a diagnosis. The evaluation consists of two steps. The first step, which is based on empirical science, is to provide a psychiatric diagnosis. The second step, which is based on normative science, is to allocate the diagnosis to one of four categories of a forensic frame of reference and to provide useful information for judicial members to make a judgment about the mental competency of the criminal. To standardize evaluations, the use of not only global standard criteria, but also a general rule for the judgment of mental competency within each allocated category is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1057-1063
Number of pages7
JournalSeishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica
Volume115
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Mental Competency
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
International Classification of Diseases
Crime
Mental Disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

[The use of operational criteria for evaluations of mental competency]. / Kocha, Hiroki.

In: Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica, Vol. 115, No. 10, 2013, p. 1057-1063.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e83259468384681a5bb1acdfe5a15aa,
title = "[The use of operational criteria for evaluations of mental competency].",
abstract = "Today, either the DSM-IV or the ICD-10 is generally used for forensic purposes, especially for evaluations of mental competency. The use of operational criteria, such as the DSM-IV, in forensic settings has some risks. Here, these risks, as well as the advantages of operational criteria and precautions for their use, are discussed. Compared with the DSM-IV, the ICD-10 is preferred because this tool is less likely to complicate evaluations of the mental status of a criminal at the time of the crime when sufficient information is not available to make a diagnosis. The evaluation consists of two steps. The first step, which is based on empirical science, is to provide a psychiatric diagnosis. The second step, which is based on normative science, is to allocate the diagnosis to one of four categories of a forensic frame of reference and to provide useful information for judicial members to make a judgment about the mental competency of the criminal. To standardize evaluations, the use of not only global standard criteria, but also a general rule for the judgment of mental competency within each allocated category is needed.",
author = "Hiroki Kocha",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "1057--1063",
journal = "Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica",
issn = "0033-2658",
publisher = "Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - [The use of operational criteria for evaluations of mental competency].

AU - Kocha, Hiroki

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Today, either the DSM-IV or the ICD-10 is generally used for forensic purposes, especially for evaluations of mental competency. The use of operational criteria, such as the DSM-IV, in forensic settings has some risks. Here, these risks, as well as the advantages of operational criteria and precautions for their use, are discussed. Compared with the DSM-IV, the ICD-10 is preferred because this tool is less likely to complicate evaluations of the mental status of a criminal at the time of the crime when sufficient information is not available to make a diagnosis. The evaluation consists of two steps. The first step, which is based on empirical science, is to provide a psychiatric diagnosis. The second step, which is based on normative science, is to allocate the diagnosis to one of four categories of a forensic frame of reference and to provide useful information for judicial members to make a judgment about the mental competency of the criminal. To standardize evaluations, the use of not only global standard criteria, but also a general rule for the judgment of mental competency within each allocated category is needed.

AB - Today, either the DSM-IV or the ICD-10 is generally used for forensic purposes, especially for evaluations of mental competency. The use of operational criteria, such as the DSM-IV, in forensic settings has some risks. Here, these risks, as well as the advantages of operational criteria and precautions for their use, are discussed. Compared with the DSM-IV, the ICD-10 is preferred because this tool is less likely to complicate evaluations of the mental status of a criminal at the time of the crime when sufficient information is not available to make a diagnosis. The evaluation consists of two steps. The first step, which is based on empirical science, is to provide a psychiatric diagnosis. The second step, which is based on normative science, is to allocate the diagnosis to one of four categories of a forensic frame of reference and to provide useful information for judicial members to make a judgment about the mental competency of the criminal. To standardize evaluations, the use of not only global standard criteria, but also a general rule for the judgment of mental competency within each allocated category is needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896144055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896144055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24341072

AN - SCOPUS:84896144055

VL - 115

SP - 1057

EP - 1063

JO - Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica

JF - Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica

SN - 0033-2658

IS - 10

ER -