The World Health report 2008 - Primary healthcare: How wide is the gap between its agenda and implementation in 12 high-income health systems?

Robin Gauld, Robert Blank, Jako Burgers, Alan B. Cohen, Mar K. Dobrow, Nao K I Ikegami, Soonman Kwon, Karen Luxford, Christopher Milett, Claus Wendt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization's 2008 report asserted that the focus on primary healthcare (PHC) within health systems should increase, with four sets of reforms required. The WHO's PHC advocacy is well founded, yet its report is a policy document that fails to address adoption and implementation questions within WHO member countries. This paper examines the prospects for the WHO PHC agenda in 12 high-income health systems from Asia, Australasia, Europe and North America, comparing performances against the WHO agenda. Methods: A health policy specialist on each of the 12 systems sketched policy activities in each of the four areas of concern to the WHO: (a) whether there is universal coverage, (b) service delivery reforms to build a PHC-oriented system, (c) reforms integrating public health initiatives into PHC settings and (d) leadership promoting dialogue among stakeholders. Findings: All 12 systems demonstrate considerable gaps between the actual status of PHC and the WHO vision when assessed in terms of the four WHO reform dimensions, although many initiatives to enhance PHC have been implemented. Institutional arrangements pose significant barriers to PHC reform as envisioned by the WHO. Conclusions: PHC reform requires more attention from policy makers. Meanwhile, the WHO PHC report is perhaps too idealistic and fails to address the fundamentals for successful policy adoption and implementation within member countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-58
Number of pages21
JournalHealthcare Policy
Volume7
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Feb

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Health
Health Care Reform
Global Health
Universal Coverage
Australasia
Health Policy
North America
Administrative Personnel
Public Health
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Gauld, R., Blank, R., Burgers, J., Cohen, A. B., Dobrow, M. K., Ikegami, N. K. I., ... Wendt, C. (2012). The World Health report 2008 - Primary healthcare: How wide is the gap between its agenda and implementation in 12 high-income health systems? Healthcare Policy, 7(3), 38-58.

The World Health report 2008 - Primary healthcare : How wide is the gap between its agenda and implementation in 12 high-income health systems? / Gauld, Robin; Blank, Robert; Burgers, Jako; Cohen, Alan B.; Dobrow, Mar K.; Ikegami, Nao K I; Kwon, Soonman; Luxford, Karen; Milett, Christopher; Wendt, Claus.

In: Healthcare Policy, Vol. 7, No. 3, 02.2012, p. 38-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gauld, R, Blank, R, Burgers, J, Cohen, AB, Dobrow, MK, Ikegami, NKI, Kwon, S, Luxford, K, Milett, C & Wendt, C 2012, 'The World Health report 2008 - Primary healthcare: How wide is the gap between its agenda and implementation in 12 high-income health systems?', Healthcare Policy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 38-58.
Gauld, Robin ; Blank, Robert ; Burgers, Jako ; Cohen, Alan B. ; Dobrow, Mar K. ; Ikegami, Nao K I ; Kwon, Soonman ; Luxford, Karen ; Milett, Christopher ; Wendt, Claus. / The World Health report 2008 - Primary healthcare : How wide is the gap between its agenda and implementation in 12 high-income health systems?. In: Healthcare Policy. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 38-58.
@article{d57eabd4a4cc41c7a366b6d34ea735bf,
title = "The World Health report 2008 - Primary healthcare: How wide is the gap between its agenda and implementation in 12 high-income health systems?",
abstract = "Background: The World Health Organization's 2008 report asserted that the focus on primary healthcare (PHC) within health systems should increase, with four sets of reforms required. The WHO's PHC advocacy is well founded, yet its report is a policy document that fails to address adoption and implementation questions within WHO member countries. This paper examines the prospects for the WHO PHC agenda in 12 high-income health systems from Asia, Australasia, Europe and North America, comparing performances against the WHO agenda. Methods: A health policy specialist on each of the 12 systems sketched policy activities in each of the four areas of concern to the WHO: (a) whether there is universal coverage, (b) service delivery reforms to build a PHC-oriented system, (c) reforms integrating public health initiatives into PHC settings and (d) leadership promoting dialogue among stakeholders. Findings: All 12 systems demonstrate considerable gaps between the actual status of PHC and the WHO vision when assessed in terms of the four WHO reform dimensions, although many initiatives to enhance PHC have been implemented. Institutional arrangements pose significant barriers to PHC reform as envisioned by the WHO. Conclusions: PHC reform requires more attention from policy makers. Meanwhile, the WHO PHC report is perhaps too idealistic and fails to address the fundamentals for successful policy adoption and implementation within member countries.",
author = "Robin Gauld and Robert Blank and Jako Burgers and Cohen, {Alan B.} and Dobrow, {Mar K.} and Ikegami, {Nao K I} and Soonman Kwon and Karen Luxford and Christopher Milett and Claus Wendt",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "38--58",
journal = "Healthcare Policy",
issn = "1715-6572",
publisher = "Longwoods Publishing Corp.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The World Health report 2008 - Primary healthcare

T2 - How wide is the gap between its agenda and implementation in 12 high-income health systems?

AU - Gauld, Robin

AU - Blank, Robert

AU - Burgers, Jako

AU - Cohen, Alan B.

AU - Dobrow, Mar K.

AU - Ikegami, Nao K I

AU - Kwon, Soonman

AU - Luxford, Karen

AU - Milett, Christopher

AU - Wendt, Claus

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Background: The World Health Organization's 2008 report asserted that the focus on primary healthcare (PHC) within health systems should increase, with four sets of reforms required. The WHO's PHC advocacy is well founded, yet its report is a policy document that fails to address adoption and implementation questions within WHO member countries. This paper examines the prospects for the WHO PHC agenda in 12 high-income health systems from Asia, Australasia, Europe and North America, comparing performances against the WHO agenda. Methods: A health policy specialist on each of the 12 systems sketched policy activities in each of the four areas of concern to the WHO: (a) whether there is universal coverage, (b) service delivery reforms to build a PHC-oriented system, (c) reforms integrating public health initiatives into PHC settings and (d) leadership promoting dialogue among stakeholders. Findings: All 12 systems demonstrate considerable gaps between the actual status of PHC and the WHO vision when assessed in terms of the four WHO reform dimensions, although many initiatives to enhance PHC have been implemented. Institutional arrangements pose significant barriers to PHC reform as envisioned by the WHO. Conclusions: PHC reform requires more attention from policy makers. Meanwhile, the WHO PHC report is perhaps too idealistic and fails to address the fundamentals for successful policy adoption and implementation within member countries.

AB - Background: The World Health Organization's 2008 report asserted that the focus on primary healthcare (PHC) within health systems should increase, with four sets of reforms required. The WHO's PHC advocacy is well founded, yet its report is a policy document that fails to address adoption and implementation questions within WHO member countries. This paper examines the prospects for the WHO PHC agenda in 12 high-income health systems from Asia, Australasia, Europe and North America, comparing performances against the WHO agenda. Methods: A health policy specialist on each of the 12 systems sketched policy activities in each of the four areas of concern to the WHO: (a) whether there is universal coverage, (b) service delivery reforms to build a PHC-oriented system, (c) reforms integrating public health initiatives into PHC settings and (d) leadership promoting dialogue among stakeholders. Findings: All 12 systems demonstrate considerable gaps between the actual status of PHC and the WHO vision when assessed in terms of the four WHO reform dimensions, although many initiatives to enhance PHC have been implemented. Institutional arrangements pose significant barriers to PHC reform as envisioned by the WHO. Conclusions: PHC reform requires more attention from policy makers. Meanwhile, the WHO PHC report is perhaps too idealistic and fails to address the fundamentals for successful policy adoption and implementation within member countries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858022375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858022375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84858022375

VL - 7

SP - 38

EP - 58

JO - Healthcare Policy

JF - Healthcare Policy

SN - 1715-6572

IS - 3

ER -