Too many to handle? Two types of multimarket contacts and entry decisions

Lailani Laynesa Alcantara, Hitoshi Mitsuhashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine how firms with multimarket contacts in both product and geographic markets make foreign direct investments (FDI) location choices and to advance the understanding about how managers with cognitive limits cope with opportunities to take the advantage of mutual forbearance in two types of markets. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing upon the literatures on multimarket contact and decision making, the authors develop original hypotheses on how multimarket contacts in two types of markets influence firms’ choice of destination for foreign investments. The authors test the hypotheses using longitudinal archival data on foreign market entries of Japanese auto parts makers. Findings: The authors find that when choosing FDI locations, firms reduce the cognitive burdens of coping with multimarket contacts in the two types of markets by focussing exclusively on what is perceived as relevant to the decision at hand. The authors also find that this propensity is particularly significant for large firms, whereas small firms use different decision rules and avoid entering markets with the greater degree of multimarket contact with prior entrants, whether in product or national market. Practical implications: Although heuristics simplify competitive environments and reduce managers’ cognitive burdens, such a cost-saving orientation could increase the risk associated with international entry that may end in severe counterattacks from prior entrants, wasteful foreign investments, and substantial entry failures. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by adopting multimarket contact theory to foreign market entry, jointly analyzing two types of multimarket contacts, testing three alternative hypotheses about how boundedly rational managers cope with multimarket contacts in two markets, and demonstrating that managers focus on multimarket contacts only in one type of markets when making entry decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-374
Number of pages21
JournalManagement Decision
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Mar 16

Fingerprint

Multimarket contact
Managers
Foreign investment
Foreign direct investment
Foreign market entry
Burden
Mutual forbearance
Heuristics
Market making
Firm location
Testing
Decision rules
Location choice
Competitive environment
Small firms
Propensity
Decision making
Large firms
Cost savings
Destination

Keywords

  • FDI
  • Heuristics
  • Japanese firms
  • Market entry
  • Multimarket contact
  • Multinational corporations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Too many to handle? Two types of multimarket contacts and entry decisions. / Alcantara, Lailani Laynesa; Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi.

In: Management Decision, Vol. 53, No. 2, 16.03.2015, p. 354-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alcantara, Lailani Laynesa ; Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi. / Too many to handle? Two types of multimarket contacts and entry decisions. In: Management Decision. 2015 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 354-374.
@article{2908578a4b754a538faaad8576748a26,
title = "Too many to handle? Two types of multimarket contacts and entry decisions",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine how firms with multimarket contacts in both product and geographic markets make foreign direct investments (FDI) location choices and to advance the understanding about how managers with cognitive limits cope with opportunities to take the advantage of mutual forbearance in two types of markets. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing upon the literatures on multimarket contact and decision making, the authors develop original hypotheses on how multimarket contacts in two types of markets influence firms’ choice of destination for foreign investments. The authors test the hypotheses using longitudinal archival data on foreign market entries of Japanese auto parts makers. Findings: The authors find that when choosing FDI locations, firms reduce the cognitive burdens of coping with multimarket contacts in the two types of markets by focussing exclusively on what is perceived as relevant to the decision at hand. The authors also find that this propensity is particularly significant for large firms, whereas small firms use different decision rules and avoid entering markets with the greater degree of multimarket contact with prior entrants, whether in product or national market. Practical implications: Although heuristics simplify competitive environments and reduce managers’ cognitive burdens, such a cost-saving orientation could increase the risk associated with international entry that may end in severe counterattacks from prior entrants, wasteful foreign investments, and substantial entry failures. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by adopting multimarket contact theory to foreign market entry, jointly analyzing two types of multimarket contacts, testing three alternative hypotheses about how boundedly rational managers cope with multimarket contacts in two markets, and demonstrating that managers focus on multimarket contacts only in one type of markets when making entry decisions.",
keywords = "FDI, Heuristics, Japanese firms, Market entry, Multimarket contact, Multinational corporations",
author = "Alcantara, {Lailani Laynesa} and Hitoshi Mitsuhashi",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1108/MD-03-2014-0125",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "354--374",
journal = "Management Decision",
issn = "0025-1747",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Too many to handle? Two types of multimarket contacts and entry decisions

AU - Alcantara, Lailani Laynesa

AU - Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi

PY - 2015/3/16

Y1 - 2015/3/16

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine how firms with multimarket contacts in both product and geographic markets make foreign direct investments (FDI) location choices and to advance the understanding about how managers with cognitive limits cope with opportunities to take the advantage of mutual forbearance in two types of markets. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing upon the literatures on multimarket contact and decision making, the authors develop original hypotheses on how multimarket contacts in two types of markets influence firms’ choice of destination for foreign investments. The authors test the hypotheses using longitudinal archival data on foreign market entries of Japanese auto parts makers. Findings: The authors find that when choosing FDI locations, firms reduce the cognitive burdens of coping with multimarket contacts in the two types of markets by focussing exclusively on what is perceived as relevant to the decision at hand. The authors also find that this propensity is particularly significant for large firms, whereas small firms use different decision rules and avoid entering markets with the greater degree of multimarket contact with prior entrants, whether in product or national market. Practical implications: Although heuristics simplify competitive environments and reduce managers’ cognitive burdens, such a cost-saving orientation could increase the risk associated with international entry that may end in severe counterattacks from prior entrants, wasteful foreign investments, and substantial entry failures. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by adopting multimarket contact theory to foreign market entry, jointly analyzing two types of multimarket contacts, testing three alternative hypotheses about how boundedly rational managers cope with multimarket contacts in two markets, and demonstrating that managers focus on multimarket contacts only in one type of markets when making entry decisions.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine how firms with multimarket contacts in both product and geographic markets make foreign direct investments (FDI) location choices and to advance the understanding about how managers with cognitive limits cope with opportunities to take the advantage of mutual forbearance in two types of markets. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing upon the literatures on multimarket contact and decision making, the authors develop original hypotheses on how multimarket contacts in two types of markets influence firms’ choice of destination for foreign investments. The authors test the hypotheses using longitudinal archival data on foreign market entries of Japanese auto parts makers. Findings: The authors find that when choosing FDI locations, firms reduce the cognitive burdens of coping with multimarket contacts in the two types of markets by focussing exclusively on what is perceived as relevant to the decision at hand. The authors also find that this propensity is particularly significant for large firms, whereas small firms use different decision rules and avoid entering markets with the greater degree of multimarket contact with prior entrants, whether in product or national market. Practical implications: Although heuristics simplify competitive environments and reduce managers’ cognitive burdens, such a cost-saving orientation could increase the risk associated with international entry that may end in severe counterattacks from prior entrants, wasteful foreign investments, and substantial entry failures. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by adopting multimarket contact theory to foreign market entry, jointly analyzing two types of multimarket contacts, testing three alternative hypotheses about how boundedly rational managers cope with multimarket contacts in two markets, and demonstrating that managers focus on multimarket contacts only in one type of markets when making entry decisions.

KW - FDI

KW - Heuristics

KW - Japanese firms

KW - Market entry

KW - Multimarket contact

KW - Multinational corporations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924653153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924653153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/MD-03-2014-0125

DO - 10.1108/MD-03-2014-0125

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84924653153

VL - 53

SP - 354

EP - 374

JO - Management Decision

JF - Management Decision

SN - 0025-1747

IS - 2

ER -