TY - JOUR
T1 - Total energy expenditure is comparable between patients with and without diabetes mellitus
T2 - Clinical Evaluation of Energy Requirements in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (CLEVER-DM) Study
AU - Morino, Katsutaro
AU - Kondo, Keiko
AU - Tanaka, Shigeho
AU - Nishida, Yuki
AU - Nakae, Satoshi
AU - Yamada, Yosuke
AU - Ugi, Satoshi
AU - Fuse, Keiko
AU - Miyazawa, Itsuko
AU - Ohi, Akiko
AU - Nishida, Kaori
AU - Kurihara, Mika
AU - Sasaki, Masaya
AU - Ebine, Naoyuki
AU - Sasaki, Satoshi
AU - Katsukawa, Fuminori
AU - Maegawa, Hiroshi
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by AMED under Grant Numbers JP17ek0210045 and JP18ek0210112. This study was also supported in part by the Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology (to KK).
Funding Information:
Funding This study was funded by AMED under Grant Numbers JP17ek0210045 and JP18ek0210112. This study was also supported in part by the Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology (to KK). Competing interests ST received consigned research funds from Omron Healthcare. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Objective Assessment of total energy expenditure (TEE) is essential for appropriate recommendations regarding dietary intake and physical activity in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). However, few reports have focused on TEE in patients with DM, particularly in Asian countries. Therefore, we evaluated TEE in Japanese patients with DM using the doubly labeled water (DLW) method and physical activity level (PAL). Research design and methods In this cross-sectional observational study, we evaluated 52 patients with type 2 DM and 15 patients without DM. Free-living TEE was measured over 12-16 days by the DLW method, and PAL was calculated as TEE divided by the basal metabolic rate (BMR) as assessed by indirect calorimetry. The equivalence margin was defined as 5 kcal/kg/day. Results The numbers of patients with DM treated with insulin, oral antidiabetic drugs, and diet were 18 (34.6%), 20 (38.5%), and 14 (26.9%), respectively. The mean±SD level of glycated hemoglobin was 6.9%±0.8% and 5.5%±0.3% in the DM and non-DM group, respectively (p<0.001). The mean body mass index was 23.3±3.0 and 22.7±2.1 kg/m 2 in the DM and non-DM group, respectively. The mean TEE per kilogram body weight adjusted for sex and age was 36.5 kcal/kg/day and 37.5 kcal/kg/day in the DM and non-DM group, respectively, with no significant difference (mean difference,-1.0 kcal/kg/day; 95% CI-4.2 to 2.3 kcal/kg/day). The BMR tended to be higher in the DM than in the non-DM group (mean difference, 33 kcal/day; 95% CI,-15 to 80 kcal/day). The mean PAL adjusted for sex and age was 1.71 and 1.81 in the DM and non-DM group, respectively, without a significant difference (mean difference,-0.10; 95% CI-0.21 to 0.01). Conclusion TEE was comparable between Japanese patients with and without DM. Trial registration number UMIN000023051.
AB - Objective Assessment of total energy expenditure (TEE) is essential for appropriate recommendations regarding dietary intake and physical activity in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). However, few reports have focused on TEE in patients with DM, particularly in Asian countries. Therefore, we evaluated TEE in Japanese patients with DM using the doubly labeled water (DLW) method and physical activity level (PAL). Research design and methods In this cross-sectional observational study, we evaluated 52 patients with type 2 DM and 15 patients without DM. Free-living TEE was measured over 12-16 days by the DLW method, and PAL was calculated as TEE divided by the basal metabolic rate (BMR) as assessed by indirect calorimetry. The equivalence margin was defined as 5 kcal/kg/day. Results The numbers of patients with DM treated with insulin, oral antidiabetic drugs, and diet were 18 (34.6%), 20 (38.5%), and 14 (26.9%), respectively. The mean±SD level of glycated hemoglobin was 6.9%±0.8% and 5.5%±0.3% in the DM and non-DM group, respectively (p<0.001). The mean body mass index was 23.3±3.0 and 22.7±2.1 kg/m 2 in the DM and non-DM group, respectively. The mean TEE per kilogram body weight adjusted for sex and age was 36.5 kcal/kg/day and 37.5 kcal/kg/day in the DM and non-DM group, respectively, with no significant difference (mean difference,-1.0 kcal/kg/day; 95% CI-4.2 to 2.3 kcal/kg/day). The BMR tended to be higher in the DM than in the non-DM group (mean difference, 33 kcal/day; 95% CI,-15 to 80 kcal/day). The mean PAL adjusted for sex and age was 1.71 and 1.81 in the DM and non-DM group, respectively, without a significant difference (mean difference,-0.10; 95% CI-0.21 to 0.01). Conclusion TEE was comparable between Japanese patients with and without DM. Trial registration number UMIN000023051.
KW - energy expesnditure
KW - physical activity
KW - type 2 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063484367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063484367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000648
DO - 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000648
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85063484367
SN - 2052-4897
VL - 7
JO - BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
JF - BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
IS - 1
M1 - e000648
ER -