Toward quality improvement of thoracic aortic surgery

estimating volume-outcome effect from nationwide survey

Hiroaki Miyata, Noboru Motomura, Yuichi Ueda, Hiroyuki Tsukihara, Koichi Tabayashi, Shinichi Takamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although understanding the association between surgical volume and outcome has been the focus of much research, no study has yet reported the volume-outcome effect for thoracic aortic surgery. Methods: From the clinical database, we identified and analyzed 2875 procedures that took place across 36 centers between 2003 and 2005. The effect of hospital procedural volume was assessed for each outcome measure using a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model. Clinical risk factors, procedural year, clinical processes, range of replacement, hospital volume and surgeon volume were set as fixed effects and sites were used as random intercepts. Results: The logistic regression model revealed that hospital thoracic aortic surgery volume was linked to statistically significant decreases in both 30-day mortality (p = 0.127: OR 0.988-0.999) and operative mortality (p = 0.022: 0.989-0.999). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that increased hospital volume was associated with reduced mortality rates in patients under 65 years of age (p = 0.038: 0.982-0.999) and in high-risk surgical candidates (p = 0.019: 0.989-0.999). Thoracic aortic surgery volume of surgeons, hospital adult cardiovascular surgery volume and surgeons adult cardiovascular surgery volume did not significantly impact these outcomes. Conclusions: In this study higher annual hospital thoracic aortic surgery volume of hospitals is associated with reduced mortality rates for thoracic aortic surgery. In Japan it is not the hospital general adult cardiovascular surgery volume, but the hospital specific thoracic aortic surgery volume that might be preferable for quality indicator of thoracic aortic surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-521
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Thoracic Surgery
Logistic Models
Mortality
Surveys and Questionnaires
General Hospitals
Japan
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Research
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular
  • Clinical database
  • Public reporting
  • Quality improvement
  • Thoracic aortic surgery
  • Volume-outcome effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Toward quality improvement of thoracic aortic surgery : estimating volume-outcome effect from nationwide survey. / Miyata, Hiroaki; Motomura, Noboru; Ueda, Yuichi; Tsukihara, Hiroyuki; Tabayashi, Koichi; Takamoto, Shinichi.

In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 517-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miyata, Hiroaki ; Motomura, Noboru ; Ueda, Yuichi ; Tsukihara, Hiroyuki ; Tabayashi, Koichi ; Takamoto, Shinichi. / Toward quality improvement of thoracic aortic surgery : estimating volume-outcome effect from nationwide survey. In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 517-521.
@article{533b58e659cb44c6acb7275b396dfa16,
title = "Toward quality improvement of thoracic aortic surgery: estimating volume-outcome effect from nationwide survey",
abstract = "Background: Although understanding the association between surgical volume and outcome has been the focus of much research, no study has yet reported the volume-outcome effect for thoracic aortic surgery. Methods: From the clinical database, we identified and analyzed 2875 procedures that took place across 36 centers between 2003 and 2005. The effect of hospital procedural volume was assessed for each outcome measure using a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model. Clinical risk factors, procedural year, clinical processes, range of replacement, hospital volume and surgeon volume were set as fixed effects and sites were used as random intercepts. Results: The logistic regression model revealed that hospital thoracic aortic surgery volume was linked to statistically significant decreases in both 30-day mortality (p = 0.127: OR 0.988-0.999) and operative mortality (p = 0.022: 0.989-0.999). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that increased hospital volume was associated with reduced mortality rates in patients under 65 years of age (p = 0.038: 0.982-0.999) and in high-risk surgical candidates (p = 0.019: 0.989-0.999). Thoracic aortic surgery volume of surgeons, hospital adult cardiovascular surgery volume and surgeons adult cardiovascular surgery volume did not significantly impact these outcomes. Conclusions: In this study higher annual hospital thoracic aortic surgery volume of hospitals is associated with reduced mortality rates for thoracic aortic surgery. In Japan it is not the hospital general adult cardiovascular surgery volume, but the hospital specific thoracic aortic surgery volume that might be preferable for quality indicator of thoracic aortic surgery.",
keywords = "Cardiovascular, Clinical database, Public reporting, Quality improvement, Thoracic aortic surgery, Volume-outcome effect",
author = "Hiroaki Miyata and Noboru Motomura and Yuichi Ueda and Hiroyuki Tsukihara and Koichi Tabayashi and Shinichi Takamoto",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.020",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "517--521",
journal = "European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery",
issn = "1010-7940",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward quality improvement of thoracic aortic surgery

T2 - estimating volume-outcome effect from nationwide survey

AU - Miyata, Hiroaki

AU - Motomura, Noboru

AU - Ueda, Yuichi

AU - Tsukihara, Hiroyuki

AU - Tabayashi, Koichi

AU - Takamoto, Shinichi

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Background: Although understanding the association between surgical volume and outcome has been the focus of much research, no study has yet reported the volume-outcome effect for thoracic aortic surgery. Methods: From the clinical database, we identified and analyzed 2875 procedures that took place across 36 centers between 2003 and 2005. The effect of hospital procedural volume was assessed for each outcome measure using a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model. Clinical risk factors, procedural year, clinical processes, range of replacement, hospital volume and surgeon volume were set as fixed effects and sites were used as random intercepts. Results: The logistic regression model revealed that hospital thoracic aortic surgery volume was linked to statistically significant decreases in both 30-day mortality (p = 0.127: OR 0.988-0.999) and operative mortality (p = 0.022: 0.989-0.999). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that increased hospital volume was associated with reduced mortality rates in patients under 65 years of age (p = 0.038: 0.982-0.999) and in high-risk surgical candidates (p = 0.019: 0.989-0.999). Thoracic aortic surgery volume of surgeons, hospital adult cardiovascular surgery volume and surgeons adult cardiovascular surgery volume did not significantly impact these outcomes. Conclusions: In this study higher annual hospital thoracic aortic surgery volume of hospitals is associated with reduced mortality rates for thoracic aortic surgery. In Japan it is not the hospital general adult cardiovascular surgery volume, but the hospital specific thoracic aortic surgery volume that might be preferable for quality indicator of thoracic aortic surgery.

AB - Background: Although understanding the association between surgical volume and outcome has been the focus of much research, no study has yet reported the volume-outcome effect for thoracic aortic surgery. Methods: From the clinical database, we identified and analyzed 2875 procedures that took place across 36 centers between 2003 and 2005. The effect of hospital procedural volume was assessed for each outcome measure using a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model. Clinical risk factors, procedural year, clinical processes, range of replacement, hospital volume and surgeon volume were set as fixed effects and sites were used as random intercepts. Results: The logistic regression model revealed that hospital thoracic aortic surgery volume was linked to statistically significant decreases in both 30-day mortality (p = 0.127: OR 0.988-0.999) and operative mortality (p = 0.022: 0.989-0.999). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that increased hospital volume was associated with reduced mortality rates in patients under 65 years of age (p = 0.038: 0.982-0.999) and in high-risk surgical candidates (p = 0.019: 0.989-0.999). Thoracic aortic surgery volume of surgeons, hospital adult cardiovascular surgery volume and surgeons adult cardiovascular surgery volume did not significantly impact these outcomes. Conclusions: In this study higher annual hospital thoracic aortic surgery volume of hospitals is associated with reduced mortality rates for thoracic aortic surgery. In Japan it is not the hospital general adult cardiovascular surgery volume, but the hospital specific thoracic aortic surgery volume that might be preferable for quality indicator of thoracic aortic surgery.

KW - Cardiovascular

KW - Clinical database

KW - Public reporting

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Thoracic aortic surgery

KW - Volume-outcome effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749092645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68749092645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.020

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 517

EP - 521

JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

SN - 1010-7940

IS - 3

ER -