Treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi with enzymatically separated epidermal sheet grafting

Kazuo Kishi, Ruka Ninomiya, Keisuke Okabe, Eri Konno, Ken ichi Katsube, Nobuaki Imanishi, Hideo Nakajima, Tatsuo Nakajima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMNs) must be considered from both a cosmetic and a medical aspect of reducing the risk of a growing malignancy. We treated five patients who had a GCMN on the trunk with an enzymatically separated epidermal sheet taken from their excised GCMN skin. All patients underwent enzymatically separated epidermal sheet grafting at the age of 2 months. With the patient under general anaesthesia, we removed the affected area with an electric dermatome until the brown colour had almost completely disappeared. The removed skin was immersed in dispase I solution (1000 U ml-1) dissolved in Ringer's solution at 37 °C for 75-105 min until the epidermal sheet separated from the dermis without tension. Three back lesions and two abdominal lesions were treated. In all cases, the enzymatically separated epidermis grafted well, without infection. The amount of discharge that accumulated from immediately after the operation until the first dressing change (performed at 3 days after the operation) was reduced compared with that from curettage. The skin colour was light brown at first and gradually became lighter within a few months. The grafted areas were soft and did not show significant re-pigmentation. In most cases, hard hair did not grow on the treated area. Histological samples taken 1 year after the operation showed that the dermal layer was reconstituted without pigmented nevus cells. Enzymatically separated epidermal grafting is a useful method for the treatment of GCMN, is easy to perform and leaves cosmetically satisfactory results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)914-920
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Volume63
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jun

Fingerprint

Pigmented Nevus
Skin
Skin Pigmentation
Therapeutics
Curettage
Pigmentation
Bandages
Dermis
Epidermis
Cosmetics
Hair
General Anesthesia
Color
Infection
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Dispase
  • Enzymatically separated epidermis
  • Giant congenital melanocytic nevi
  • Graft

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi with enzymatically separated epidermal sheet grafting. / Kishi, Kazuo; Ninomiya, Ruka; Okabe, Keisuke; Konno, Eri; Katsube, Ken ichi; Imanishi, Nobuaki; Nakajima, Hideo; Nakajima, Tatsuo.

In: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Vol. 63, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 914-920.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cc6aa1b432ba49d6a91dfa00fe7a95be,
title = "Treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi with enzymatically separated epidermal sheet grafting",
abstract = "Treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMNs) must be considered from both a cosmetic and a medical aspect of reducing the risk of a growing malignancy. We treated five patients who had a GCMN on the trunk with an enzymatically separated epidermal sheet taken from their excised GCMN skin. All patients underwent enzymatically separated epidermal sheet grafting at the age of 2 months. With the patient under general anaesthesia, we removed the affected area with an electric dermatome until the brown colour had almost completely disappeared. The removed skin was immersed in dispase I solution (1000 U ml-1) dissolved in Ringer's solution at 37 °C for 75-105 min until the epidermal sheet separated from the dermis without tension. Three back lesions and two abdominal lesions were treated. In all cases, the enzymatically separated epidermis grafted well, without infection. The amount of discharge that accumulated from immediately after the operation until the first dressing change (performed at 3 days after the operation) was reduced compared with that from curettage. The skin colour was light brown at first and gradually became lighter within a few months. The grafted areas were soft and did not show significant re-pigmentation. In most cases, hard hair did not grow on the treated area. Histological samples taken 1 year after the operation showed that the dermal layer was reconstituted without pigmented nevus cells. Enzymatically separated epidermal grafting is a useful method for the treatment of GCMN, is easy to perform and leaves cosmetically satisfactory results.",
keywords = "Dispase, Enzymatically separated epidermis, Giant congenital melanocytic nevi, Graft",
author = "Kazuo Kishi and Ruka Ninomiya and Keisuke Okabe and Eri Konno and Katsube, {Ken ichi} and Nobuaki Imanishi and Hideo Nakajima and Tatsuo Nakajima",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.010",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "914--920",
journal = "Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery",
issn = "1748-6815",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi with enzymatically separated epidermal sheet grafting

AU - Kishi, Kazuo

AU - Ninomiya, Ruka

AU - Okabe, Keisuke

AU - Konno, Eri

AU - Katsube, Ken ichi

AU - Imanishi, Nobuaki

AU - Nakajima, Hideo

AU - Nakajima, Tatsuo

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMNs) must be considered from both a cosmetic and a medical aspect of reducing the risk of a growing malignancy. We treated five patients who had a GCMN on the trunk with an enzymatically separated epidermal sheet taken from their excised GCMN skin. All patients underwent enzymatically separated epidermal sheet grafting at the age of 2 months. With the patient under general anaesthesia, we removed the affected area with an electric dermatome until the brown colour had almost completely disappeared. The removed skin was immersed in dispase I solution (1000 U ml-1) dissolved in Ringer's solution at 37 °C for 75-105 min until the epidermal sheet separated from the dermis without tension. Three back lesions and two abdominal lesions were treated. In all cases, the enzymatically separated epidermis grafted well, without infection. The amount of discharge that accumulated from immediately after the operation until the first dressing change (performed at 3 days after the operation) was reduced compared with that from curettage. The skin colour was light brown at first and gradually became lighter within a few months. The grafted areas were soft and did not show significant re-pigmentation. In most cases, hard hair did not grow on the treated area. Histological samples taken 1 year after the operation showed that the dermal layer was reconstituted without pigmented nevus cells. Enzymatically separated epidermal grafting is a useful method for the treatment of GCMN, is easy to perform and leaves cosmetically satisfactory results.

AB - Treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMNs) must be considered from both a cosmetic and a medical aspect of reducing the risk of a growing malignancy. We treated five patients who had a GCMN on the trunk with an enzymatically separated epidermal sheet taken from their excised GCMN skin. All patients underwent enzymatically separated epidermal sheet grafting at the age of 2 months. With the patient under general anaesthesia, we removed the affected area with an electric dermatome until the brown colour had almost completely disappeared. The removed skin was immersed in dispase I solution (1000 U ml-1) dissolved in Ringer's solution at 37 °C for 75-105 min until the epidermal sheet separated from the dermis without tension. Three back lesions and two abdominal lesions were treated. In all cases, the enzymatically separated epidermis grafted well, without infection. The amount of discharge that accumulated from immediately after the operation until the first dressing change (performed at 3 days after the operation) was reduced compared with that from curettage. The skin colour was light brown at first and gradually became lighter within a few months. The grafted areas were soft and did not show significant re-pigmentation. In most cases, hard hair did not grow on the treated area. Histological samples taken 1 year after the operation showed that the dermal layer was reconstituted without pigmented nevus cells. Enzymatically separated epidermal grafting is a useful method for the treatment of GCMN, is easy to perform and leaves cosmetically satisfactory results.

KW - Dispase

KW - Enzymatically separated epidermis

KW - Giant congenital melanocytic nevi

KW - Graft

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951667296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951667296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 19398222

AN - SCOPUS:77951667296

VL - 63

SP - 914

EP - 920

JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

SN - 1748-6815

IS - 6

ER -