Ultrasound imaging of the anorectal malformation during the neonatal period: a comprehensive review

Takahiro Hosokawa, Yoshitake Yamada, Mayumi Hsokawa, Shunsuke Kikuchi, Kenji Ohira, Yutaka Tanami, Yumiko Sato, Eiji Oguma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Anorectal malformation (ARM) is classified as low, intermediate, or high; accurate diagnosis of the type during the early neonatal period is important to determine the appropriate initial surgical approach. This review assesses the role of ultrasound examination in the classification of ARM during the neonatal period, with a focus on landmarks on the sonogram, the approach used for sonography, and the optimal examination timing. The following three factors on the sonogram are used for the classification: location of the fistula, the distance between the distal rectal pouch and the anal dimple (perineum) (P–P distance), and the relationship between the puborectalis muscle and the distal rectal pouch. Three approaches can be used to evaluate ARM by ultrasonography, namely, suprapubic, perineal, and infracoccygeal approaches. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Optimal timing of the ultrasound examination is also important with respect to each factor to classify ARM. We have described the pitfalls of ultrasound in diagnosis of cases, namely ARM with Down syndrome (which tends to be without fistula), ARM with low birth weight, ARM with unusual location of fistula, ARM with opened fistula (where the P–P distance is unreliable), and cloacal malformation (variation of the high-type ARM).

Original languageEnglish
JournalJapanese Journal of Radiology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
Fistula
Anorectal Malformations
Perineum
Low Birth Weight Infant
Down Syndrome
Muscles

Keywords

  • Anorectal malformation
  • Imperforate anus
  • Sonography
  • Ultrasonography
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Ultrasound imaging of the anorectal malformation during the neonatal period : a comprehensive review. / Hosokawa, Takahiro; Yamada, Yoshitake; Hsokawa, Mayumi; Kikuchi, Shunsuke; Ohira, Kenji; Tanami, Yutaka; Sato, Yumiko; Oguma, Eiji.

In: Japanese Journal of Radiology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hosokawa, Takahiro ; Yamada, Yoshitake ; Hsokawa, Mayumi ; Kikuchi, Shunsuke ; Ohira, Kenji ; Tanami, Yutaka ; Sato, Yumiko ; Oguma, Eiji. / Ultrasound imaging of the anorectal malformation during the neonatal period : a comprehensive review. In: Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2018.
@article{406f89d9c7764dbd94795d4b37623961,
title = "Ultrasound imaging of the anorectal malformation during the neonatal period: a comprehensive review",
abstract = "Anorectal malformation (ARM) is classified as low, intermediate, or high; accurate diagnosis of the type during the early neonatal period is important to determine the appropriate initial surgical approach. This review assesses the role of ultrasound examination in the classification of ARM during the neonatal period, with a focus on landmarks on the sonogram, the approach used for sonography, and the optimal examination timing. The following three factors on the sonogram are used for the classification: location of the fistula, the distance between the distal rectal pouch and the anal dimple (perineum) (P–P distance), and the relationship between the puborectalis muscle and the distal rectal pouch. Three approaches can be used to evaluate ARM by ultrasonography, namely, suprapubic, perineal, and infracoccygeal approaches. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Optimal timing of the ultrasound examination is also important with respect to each factor to classify ARM. We have described the pitfalls of ultrasound in diagnosis of cases, namely ARM with Down syndrome (which tends to be without fistula), ARM with low birth weight, ARM with unusual location of fistula, ARM with opened fistula (where the P–P distance is unreliable), and cloacal malformation (variation of the high-type ARM).",
keywords = "Anorectal malformation, Imperforate anus, Sonography, Ultrasonography, Ultrasound",
author = "Takahiro Hosokawa and Yoshitake Yamada and Mayumi Hsokawa and Shunsuke Kikuchi and Kenji Ohira and Yutaka Tanami and Yumiko Sato and Eiji Oguma",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11604-018-0767-7",
language = "English",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Radiology",
issn = "1867-1071",
publisher = "Springer Japan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound imaging of the anorectal malformation during the neonatal period

T2 - a comprehensive review

AU - Hosokawa, Takahiro

AU - Yamada, Yoshitake

AU - Hsokawa, Mayumi

AU - Kikuchi, Shunsuke

AU - Ohira, Kenji

AU - Tanami, Yutaka

AU - Sato, Yumiko

AU - Oguma, Eiji

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Anorectal malformation (ARM) is classified as low, intermediate, or high; accurate diagnosis of the type during the early neonatal period is important to determine the appropriate initial surgical approach. This review assesses the role of ultrasound examination in the classification of ARM during the neonatal period, with a focus on landmarks on the sonogram, the approach used for sonography, and the optimal examination timing. The following three factors on the sonogram are used for the classification: location of the fistula, the distance between the distal rectal pouch and the anal dimple (perineum) (P–P distance), and the relationship between the puborectalis muscle and the distal rectal pouch. Three approaches can be used to evaluate ARM by ultrasonography, namely, suprapubic, perineal, and infracoccygeal approaches. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Optimal timing of the ultrasound examination is also important with respect to each factor to classify ARM. We have described the pitfalls of ultrasound in diagnosis of cases, namely ARM with Down syndrome (which tends to be without fistula), ARM with low birth weight, ARM with unusual location of fistula, ARM with opened fistula (where the P–P distance is unreliable), and cloacal malformation (variation of the high-type ARM).

AB - Anorectal malformation (ARM) is classified as low, intermediate, or high; accurate diagnosis of the type during the early neonatal period is important to determine the appropriate initial surgical approach. This review assesses the role of ultrasound examination in the classification of ARM during the neonatal period, with a focus on landmarks on the sonogram, the approach used for sonography, and the optimal examination timing. The following three factors on the sonogram are used for the classification: location of the fistula, the distance between the distal rectal pouch and the anal dimple (perineum) (P–P distance), and the relationship between the puborectalis muscle and the distal rectal pouch. Three approaches can be used to evaluate ARM by ultrasonography, namely, suprapubic, perineal, and infracoccygeal approaches. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Optimal timing of the ultrasound examination is also important with respect to each factor to classify ARM. We have described the pitfalls of ultrasound in diagnosis of cases, namely ARM with Down syndrome (which tends to be without fistula), ARM with low birth weight, ARM with unusual location of fistula, ARM with opened fistula (where the P–P distance is unreliable), and cloacal malformation (variation of the high-type ARM).

KW - Anorectal malformation

KW - Imperforate anus

KW - Sonography

KW - Ultrasonography

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051814724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051814724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11604-018-0767-7

DO - 10.1007/s11604-018-0767-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 30120703

AN - SCOPUS:85051814724

JO - Japanese Journal of Radiology

JF - Japanese Journal of Radiology

SN - 1867-1071

ER -