TY - JOUR
T1 - Urban systems design case study
T2 - Tokyo’s sumida ward
AU - Tobey, Michael B.
AU - Binder, Robert B.
AU - Yoshida, Takahiro
AU - Yamagata, Yoshiki
N1 - Funding Information:
Our team would like to take this opportunity to thank the administrative staff with the Global Carbon Project at the National Institute for Environmental Studies. Without their hard work and efforts, our team would not have had the opportunity to work together at the Institute in Tsukuba, Japan. Additionally, we must acknowledge the hard work of the Spring 2016, 2017, and 2018 International Design Studios from the Georgia Institute of Technology, who utilized Urban Systems Design methods in their studio, which laid the groundwork for our team’s deep look into improving their methods.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Meeting the needs of increasing environmental and systematic pressures in urban settlements requires the use of integrated and wholistic approaches. The Urban Systems Design (USD) Conceptual Framework joins the metric-based modeling of rationalized methods with human-driven goals to form a combined iterative design and analysis loop. The framework processes information for the fundamental element of cities—humans—to large-scale modeling and decision-making occurring in district-and ward-level planning. There is a need in the planning and design profession to better integrate these efforts at a greater scale to create smart communities that are inclusive and comprehensive in aspects from data management to energy and transportation networks. The purpose of this study is to examine the applicability of this method as it pertains to a model and design integrated approach. Northern Sumida Ward, located in Tokyo, exemplifies the contextualized needs of Tokyo, and Japan, while forming a coherent internal community. Focusing on methodology, our process explores the creation of typologies, metric-based analysis, and design-based approaches that are integrated into modeling. The results of the analyses provide initial evidence regarding the validity of the USD approach in modeling changes to complex systems at differing design scales, connecting various qualities of the built environment, building and urban forms, and diagnostic comparisons between baseline and change conditions. Because of some inconsistencies and the need for further evidence gathering, the methods and processes show that there is much work to be done to strengthen the model and to continue building a more productive field of USD. However, in this framework’s continuing evolution, there is increasing evidence that combining the planning and design of urban systems creates a more resilient, economically viable, sustainable, and comfortable city.
AB - Meeting the needs of increasing environmental and systematic pressures in urban settlements requires the use of integrated and wholistic approaches. The Urban Systems Design (USD) Conceptual Framework joins the metric-based modeling of rationalized methods with human-driven goals to form a combined iterative design and analysis loop. The framework processes information for the fundamental element of cities—humans—to large-scale modeling and decision-making occurring in district-and ward-level planning. There is a need in the planning and design profession to better integrate these efforts at a greater scale to create smart communities that are inclusive and comprehensive in aspects from data management to energy and transportation networks. The purpose of this study is to examine the applicability of this method as it pertains to a model and design integrated approach. Northern Sumida Ward, located in Tokyo, exemplifies the contextualized needs of Tokyo, and Japan, while forming a coherent internal community. Focusing on methodology, our process explores the creation of typologies, metric-based analysis, and design-based approaches that are integrated into modeling. The results of the analyses provide initial evidence regarding the validity of the USD approach in modeling changes to complex systems at differing design scales, connecting various qualities of the built environment, building and urban forms, and diagnostic comparisons between baseline and change conditions. Because of some inconsistencies and the need for further evidence gathering, the methods and processes show that there is much work to be done to strengthen the model and to continue building a more productive field of USD. However, in this framework’s continuing evolution, there is increasing evidence that combining the planning and design of urban systems creates a more resilient, economically viable, sustainable, and comfortable city.
KW - Economics
KW - GIS
KW - Human factors
KW - Planning Support System
KW - Resilience
KW - Sustainability
KW - Tokyo
KW - Urban planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109358752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109358752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/smartcities2040028
DO - 10.3390/smartcities2040028
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109358752
SN - 2624-6511
VL - 2
SP - 453
EP - 470
JO - Smart Cities
JF - Smart Cities
IS - 4
ER -