TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of common average reference and large-Laplacian spatial-filters enhances EEG signal-to-noise ratios in intrinsic sensorimotor activity
AU - Tsuchimoto, Shohei
AU - Shibusawa, Shuka
AU - Iwama, Seitaro
AU - Hayashi, Masaaki
AU - Okuyama, Kohei
AU - Mizuguchi, Nobuaki
AU - Kato, Kenji
AU - Ushiba, Junichi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partly supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) ( JP16K01469 ), Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) ( JP25750267 ), and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) ( JP20he2302006 ). We thank Kumi Nanjo and Sayoko Ishii for their technical supports.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Background: Oscillations in the resting-state scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) represent various intrinsic brain activities. One of the characteristic EEG oscillations is the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)—with its arch-shaped waveform in alpha- and betabands—that reflect sensorimotor activity. The representation of sensorimotor activity by the SMR depends on the signal-to-noise ratio achieved by EEG spatial filters. New method: We employed simultaneous recording of EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging, and 10-min resting-state brain activities were recorded in 19 healthy volunteers. To compare the EEG spatial-filtering methods commonly used for extracting sensorimotor cortical activities, we assessed nine different spatial-filters: a default reference of EEG amplifier system, a common average reference (CAR), small-, middle- and large-Laplacian filters, and four types of bipolar manners (C3-Cz, C3-F3, C3-P3, and C3-T7). We identified the brain region that correlated with the EEG-SMR power obtained after each spatial-filtering method was applied. Subsequently, we calculated the proportion of the significant voxels in the sensorimotor cortex as well as the sensorimotor occupancy in all significant regions to examine the sensitivity and specificity of each spatial-filter. Results: The CAR and large-Laplacian spatial-filters were superior at improving the signal-to-noise ratios for extracting sensorimotor activity from the EEG-SMR signal. Comparison with existing methods: Our results are consistent with the spatial-filter selection to extract task-dependent activation for better control of EEG-SMR-based interventions. Our approach has the potential to identify the optimal spatial-filter for EEG-SMR. Conclusions: Evaluating spatial-filters for extracting spontaneous sensorimotor activity from the EEG is a useful procedure for constructing more effective EEG-SMR-based interventions.
AB - Background: Oscillations in the resting-state scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) represent various intrinsic brain activities. One of the characteristic EEG oscillations is the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)—with its arch-shaped waveform in alpha- and betabands—that reflect sensorimotor activity. The representation of sensorimotor activity by the SMR depends on the signal-to-noise ratio achieved by EEG spatial filters. New method: We employed simultaneous recording of EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging, and 10-min resting-state brain activities were recorded in 19 healthy volunteers. To compare the EEG spatial-filtering methods commonly used for extracting sensorimotor cortical activities, we assessed nine different spatial-filters: a default reference of EEG amplifier system, a common average reference (CAR), small-, middle- and large-Laplacian filters, and four types of bipolar manners (C3-Cz, C3-F3, C3-P3, and C3-T7). We identified the brain region that correlated with the EEG-SMR power obtained after each spatial-filtering method was applied. Subsequently, we calculated the proportion of the significant voxels in the sensorimotor cortex as well as the sensorimotor occupancy in all significant regions to examine the sensitivity and specificity of each spatial-filter. Results: The CAR and large-Laplacian spatial-filters were superior at improving the signal-to-noise ratios for extracting sensorimotor activity from the EEG-SMR signal. Comparison with existing methods: Our results are consistent with the spatial-filter selection to extract task-dependent activation for better control of EEG-SMR-based interventions. Our approach has the potential to identify the optimal spatial-filter for EEG-SMR. Conclusions: Evaluating spatial-filters for extracting spontaneous sensorimotor activity from the EEG is a useful procedure for constructing more effective EEG-SMR-based interventions.
KW - EEG sensorimotor rhythm
KW - EEG-fMRI simultaneous recording
KW - Mu rhythm
KW - Resting-state
KW - Sensorimotor activity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100491578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100491578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109089
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109089
M3 - Article
C2 - 33508408
AN - SCOPUS:85100491578
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 353
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
M1 - 109089
ER -