Validation of inflationary noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the emergency room

Junichi Sasaki, Yoshiharu Kikuchi, Takashi Usuda, Shingo Hori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the values of a noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement during cuff inflation (inflationary NIBP) and deflationary NIBP measurements and to verify whether inflationary NIBP is equivalent to conventional deflationary NIBP and is acceptable for clinical use in the emergency room (ER). Materials and methods A total of 2981 NIBP data points were collected from 175 patients (age, 56.5± 22.2 years; range, 7-92 years) who had been treated in the resuscitation area of the ER at Keio University Hospital. The data points were obtained using two alternate algorithms with a standard monitor (BSM-6000). One algorithm consisted of continuous inflationary and deflationary measurements in a single cycle (dual algorithm, 1502 data points); this algorithm was used to verify the success rate and the precision of the data. The second algorithm (1479 data points) consisted of only conventional deflationary measurements and was used to verify the duration of the measurement cycle. Results The success rate of the inflationary NIBP (completed using only the inflationary method) was 69.0%. Failures in the inflationary measurements were caused by arrhythmia and/or body motions. The mean difference and SD of the systolic pressure and the diastolic pressure between inflationary NIBP and deflationary NIBP were-0.6± 8.8 and 3.5± 7.5 mmHg, respectively. The confidence intervals were-0.6 (95% confidence interval=-1.1 to-0.1) and 3.5 (95% confidence interval=3.0 to 4.0) mmHg. The coefficients of correlation were 0.96 and 0.93. Inflationary NIBP was capable of determining the NIBP more quickly compared with deflationary NIBP (average of 15.9 vs. 34.2 s; P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-329
Number of pages5
JournalBlood Pressure Monitoring
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Nov 3

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Blood Pressure
Confidence Intervals
Economic Inflation
Resuscitation
Cardiac Arrhythmias

Keywords

  • Emergency department
  • Inflationary
  • Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring
  • Oscillometric method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Assessment and Diagnosis
  • Advanced and Specialised Nursing

Cite this

Validation of inflationary noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the emergency room. / Sasaki, Junichi; Kikuchi, Yoshiharu; Usuda, Takashi; Hori, Shingo.

In: Blood Pressure Monitoring, Vol. 20, No. 6, 03.11.2015, p. 325-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sasaki, Junichi ; Kikuchi, Yoshiharu ; Usuda, Takashi ; Hori, Shingo. / Validation of inflationary noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the emergency room. In: Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 325-329.
@article{f9e62efd50c040b3976de86c7f264e9c,
title = "Validation of inflationary noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the emergency room",
abstract = "Objective The aim of this study was to compare the values of a noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement during cuff inflation (inflationary NIBP) and deflationary NIBP measurements and to verify whether inflationary NIBP is equivalent to conventional deflationary NIBP and is acceptable for clinical use in the emergency room (ER). Materials and methods A total of 2981 NIBP data points were collected from 175 patients (age, 56.5± 22.2 years; range, 7-92 years) who had been treated in the resuscitation area of the ER at Keio University Hospital. The data points were obtained using two alternate algorithms with a standard monitor (BSM-6000). One algorithm consisted of continuous inflationary and deflationary measurements in a single cycle (dual algorithm, 1502 data points); this algorithm was used to verify the success rate and the precision of the data. The second algorithm (1479 data points) consisted of only conventional deflationary measurements and was used to verify the duration of the measurement cycle. Results The success rate of the inflationary NIBP (completed using only the inflationary method) was 69.0{\%}. Failures in the inflationary measurements were caused by arrhythmia and/or body motions. The mean difference and SD of the systolic pressure and the diastolic pressure between inflationary NIBP and deflationary NIBP were-0.6± 8.8 and 3.5± 7.5 mmHg, respectively. The confidence intervals were-0.6 (95{\%} confidence interval=-1.1 to-0.1) and 3.5 (95{\%} confidence interval=3.0 to 4.0) mmHg. The coefficients of correlation were 0.96 and 0.93. Inflationary NIBP was capable of determining the NIBP more quickly compared with deflationary NIBP (average of 15.9 vs. 34.2 s; P",
keywords = "Emergency department, Inflationary, Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring, Oscillometric method",
author = "Junichi Sasaki and Yoshiharu Kikuchi and Takashi Usuda and Shingo Hori",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1097/MBP.0000000000000145",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "325--329",
journal = "Blood Pressure Monitoring",
issn = "1359-5237",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of inflationary noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the emergency room

AU - Sasaki, Junichi

AU - Kikuchi, Yoshiharu

AU - Usuda, Takashi

AU - Hori, Shingo

PY - 2015/11/3

Y1 - 2015/11/3

N2 - Objective The aim of this study was to compare the values of a noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement during cuff inflation (inflationary NIBP) and deflationary NIBP measurements and to verify whether inflationary NIBP is equivalent to conventional deflationary NIBP and is acceptable for clinical use in the emergency room (ER). Materials and methods A total of 2981 NIBP data points were collected from 175 patients (age, 56.5± 22.2 years; range, 7-92 years) who had been treated in the resuscitation area of the ER at Keio University Hospital. The data points were obtained using two alternate algorithms with a standard monitor (BSM-6000). One algorithm consisted of continuous inflationary and deflationary measurements in a single cycle (dual algorithm, 1502 data points); this algorithm was used to verify the success rate and the precision of the data. The second algorithm (1479 data points) consisted of only conventional deflationary measurements and was used to verify the duration of the measurement cycle. Results The success rate of the inflationary NIBP (completed using only the inflationary method) was 69.0%. Failures in the inflationary measurements were caused by arrhythmia and/or body motions. The mean difference and SD of the systolic pressure and the diastolic pressure between inflationary NIBP and deflationary NIBP were-0.6± 8.8 and 3.5± 7.5 mmHg, respectively. The confidence intervals were-0.6 (95% confidence interval=-1.1 to-0.1) and 3.5 (95% confidence interval=3.0 to 4.0) mmHg. The coefficients of correlation were 0.96 and 0.93. Inflationary NIBP was capable of determining the NIBP more quickly compared with deflationary NIBP (average of 15.9 vs. 34.2 s; P

AB - Objective The aim of this study was to compare the values of a noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement during cuff inflation (inflationary NIBP) and deflationary NIBP measurements and to verify whether inflationary NIBP is equivalent to conventional deflationary NIBP and is acceptable for clinical use in the emergency room (ER). Materials and methods A total of 2981 NIBP data points were collected from 175 patients (age, 56.5± 22.2 years; range, 7-92 years) who had been treated in the resuscitation area of the ER at Keio University Hospital. The data points were obtained using two alternate algorithms with a standard monitor (BSM-6000). One algorithm consisted of continuous inflationary and deflationary measurements in a single cycle (dual algorithm, 1502 data points); this algorithm was used to verify the success rate and the precision of the data. The second algorithm (1479 data points) consisted of only conventional deflationary measurements and was used to verify the duration of the measurement cycle. Results The success rate of the inflationary NIBP (completed using only the inflationary method) was 69.0%. Failures in the inflationary measurements were caused by arrhythmia and/or body motions. The mean difference and SD of the systolic pressure and the diastolic pressure between inflationary NIBP and deflationary NIBP were-0.6± 8.8 and 3.5± 7.5 mmHg, respectively. The confidence intervals were-0.6 (95% confidence interval=-1.1 to-0.1) and 3.5 (95% confidence interval=3.0 to 4.0) mmHg. The coefficients of correlation were 0.96 and 0.93. Inflationary NIBP was capable of determining the NIBP more quickly compared with deflationary NIBP (average of 15.9 vs. 34.2 s; P

KW - Emergency department

KW - Inflationary

KW - Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring

KW - Oscillometric method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947064499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947064499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000145

DO - 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000145

M3 - Article

C2 - 26241294

AN - SCOPUS:84947064499

VL - 20

SP - 325

EP - 329

JO - Blood Pressure Monitoring

JF - Blood Pressure Monitoring

SN - 1359-5237

IS - 6

ER -