Validation of the gerdQ questionnaire for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Japan

Hidekazu Suzuki, Juntaro Matsuzaki, Sawako Okada, Kenro Hirata, Seiichiro Fukuhara, Toshifumi Hibi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The GerdQ scoring system may be a useful tool for managing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, GerdQ has not been fully validated in Asian countries. Objective: To validate the Japanese version of GerdQ and to compare this version to the Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ) in both general and hospital-based populations. Methods: The questionnaires, including the Japanese versions of GerdQ and CDQ, and questions designed to collect demographic information, were sent to a general population via the web, and to a hospital-based population via conven tional mail. The optimal cutoff GerdQ score and the differences in the characteristics between GerdQ and CDQ were assessed. Results: The answers from 863 web-responders and 303 conventional-mail responders were analysed. When a GerdQ cutoff score was set at 8, GerdQ significantly predicted the presence of reflux oesophagitis. Although the GerdQ scores were correlated with the CDQ scores, the concordance rates were poor. Multivariate analysis results indicated that, the additionaluse of over-the-counter medications was associated with GerdQ score≥8, but not with CDQ score≥6. Conclusions: The GerdQ cutoff score of 8 was appropriate for the Japanese population. Compared with CDQ, GerdQ was more useful for evaluating treatment efficacy and detecting patients’ unmet medical needs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-183
Number of pages9
JournalUnited European Gastroenterology Journal
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Esophageal Diseases
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Japan
Postal Service
Population
Peptic Esophagitis
Surveys and Questionnaires
General Hospitals
Multivariate Analysis
Demography

Keywords

  • Cutoff
  • GERD
  • GerdQ
  • Questionnaire
  • Unmet medical need

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Validation of the gerdQ questionnaire for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Japan. / Suzuki, Hidekazu; Matsuzaki, Juntaro; Okada, Sawako; Hirata, Kenro; Fukuhara, Seiichiro; Hibi, Toshifumi.

In: United European Gastroenterology Journal, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2013, p. 175-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9dbc63e98ad54643be9aced2c34ea70b,
title = "Validation of the gerdQ questionnaire for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Japan",
abstract = "Background: The GerdQ scoring system may be a useful tool for managing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, GerdQ has not been fully validated in Asian countries. Objective: To validate the Japanese version of GerdQ and to compare this version to the Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ) in both general and hospital-based populations. Methods: The questionnaires, including the Japanese versions of GerdQ and CDQ, and questions designed to collect demographic information, were sent to a general population via the web, and to a hospital-based population via conven tional mail. The optimal cutoff GerdQ score and the differences in the characteristics between GerdQ and CDQ were assessed. Results: The answers from 863 web-responders and 303 conventional-mail responders were analysed. When a GerdQ cutoff score was set at 8, GerdQ significantly predicted the presence of reflux oesophagitis. Although the GerdQ scores were correlated with the CDQ scores, the concordance rates were poor. Multivariate analysis results indicated that, the additionaluse of over-the-counter medications was associated with GerdQ score≥8, but not with CDQ score≥6. Conclusions: The GerdQ cutoff score of 8 was appropriate for the Japanese population. Compared with CDQ, GerdQ was more useful for evaluating treatment efficacy and detecting patients’ unmet medical needs.",
keywords = "Cutoff, GERD, GerdQ, Questionnaire, Unmet medical need",
author = "Hidekazu Suzuki and Juntaro Matsuzaki and Sawako Okada and Kenro Hirata and Seiichiro Fukuhara and Toshifumi Hibi",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/2050640613485238",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "175--183",
journal = "United European Gastroenterology Journal",
issn = "2050-6406",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the gerdQ questionnaire for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Japan

AU - Suzuki, Hidekazu

AU - Matsuzaki, Juntaro

AU - Okada, Sawako

AU - Hirata, Kenro

AU - Fukuhara, Seiichiro

AU - Hibi, Toshifumi

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: The GerdQ scoring system may be a useful tool for managing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, GerdQ has not been fully validated in Asian countries. Objective: To validate the Japanese version of GerdQ and to compare this version to the Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ) in both general and hospital-based populations. Methods: The questionnaires, including the Japanese versions of GerdQ and CDQ, and questions designed to collect demographic information, were sent to a general population via the web, and to a hospital-based population via conven tional mail. The optimal cutoff GerdQ score and the differences in the characteristics between GerdQ and CDQ were assessed. Results: The answers from 863 web-responders and 303 conventional-mail responders were analysed. When a GerdQ cutoff score was set at 8, GerdQ significantly predicted the presence of reflux oesophagitis. Although the GerdQ scores were correlated with the CDQ scores, the concordance rates were poor. Multivariate analysis results indicated that, the additionaluse of over-the-counter medications was associated with GerdQ score≥8, but not with CDQ score≥6. Conclusions: The GerdQ cutoff score of 8 was appropriate for the Japanese population. Compared with CDQ, GerdQ was more useful for evaluating treatment efficacy and detecting patients’ unmet medical needs.

AB - Background: The GerdQ scoring system may be a useful tool for managing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, GerdQ has not been fully validated in Asian countries. Objective: To validate the Japanese version of GerdQ and to compare this version to the Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ) in both general and hospital-based populations. Methods: The questionnaires, including the Japanese versions of GerdQ and CDQ, and questions designed to collect demographic information, were sent to a general population via the web, and to a hospital-based population via conven tional mail. The optimal cutoff GerdQ score and the differences in the characteristics between GerdQ and CDQ were assessed. Results: The answers from 863 web-responders and 303 conventional-mail responders were analysed. When a GerdQ cutoff score was set at 8, GerdQ significantly predicted the presence of reflux oesophagitis. Although the GerdQ scores were correlated with the CDQ scores, the concordance rates were poor. Multivariate analysis results indicated that, the additionaluse of over-the-counter medications was associated with GerdQ score≥8, but not with CDQ score≥6. Conclusions: The GerdQ cutoff score of 8 was appropriate for the Japanese population. Compared with CDQ, GerdQ was more useful for evaluating treatment efficacy and detecting patients’ unmet medical needs.

KW - Cutoff

KW - GERD

KW - GerdQ

KW - Questionnaire

KW - Unmet medical need

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006198870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006198870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2050640613485238

DO - 10.1177/2050640613485238

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85006198870

VL - 1

SP - 175

EP - 183

JO - United European Gastroenterology Journal

JF - United European Gastroenterology Journal

SN - 2050-6406

IS - 3

ER -