Validation Study for the Brief Measure of Quality of Life and Quality of Care: A Questionnaire for the National Random Sampling Hospital Survey

Megumi Shimizu, Daisuke Fujisawa, Miho Kurihara, Kazuki Sato, Tatsuya Morita, Masashi Kato, Mitsunori Miyashita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To monitor quality of life (QOL) for patients with cancer in a large population-based survey, we developed a short QOL and quality-of-care (QOC) questionnaire. To determine the validity and reliability of this new questionnaire for evaluating QOL in patients with cancer. Methods: Outpatients and inpatients at National Cancer Center Hospital East were administered a questionnaire, including the following items—the short QOL and QOC questionnaire (physical distress, pain, emotional distress, walk burden, and need for help with self-care; perceived general health status; and satisfaction with medical care and treatment by doctor, communication with doctor, support by health-care staff other than doctor, care for physical symptoms such as pain, and psychological care), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General (FACT-G), the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale (CCES) for patients, and demographic and medical data. We then readministered the short QOL and QOC questionnaire. Results: In total, 329 outpatients and 239 inpatients completed the survey (response rates: 80% and 90%, respectively). Total Cronbach α for the short QOL and QOC questionnaire was 0.83 for outpatients and 0.82 for inpatients. Items of the questionnaire correlated with cancer-specific measurements, FACT-G, and CCES. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all items of the questionnaire were 0.79 and 0.89 in each setting. Items of QOL and QOC did not correlate with each other. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of the short QOL and QOC questionnaire appear sufficient. This questionnaire enables continuous monitoring of patient QOL in large population-based surveys.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)622-631
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Validation Studies
Quality of Life
Neoplasms
Inpatients
Outpatients
Surveys and Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Cancer Care Facilities
Pain
Physiologic Monitoring
Self Care
Population
Health Status

Keywords

  • neoplasms
  • quality-of-care questionnaire
  • quality-of-life questionnaire
  • reliability
  • validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Validation Study for the Brief Measure of Quality of Life and Quality of Care : A Questionnaire for the National Random Sampling Hospital Survey. / Shimizu, Megumi; Fujisawa, Daisuke; Kurihara, Miho; Sato, Kazuki; Morita, Tatsuya; Kato, Masashi; Miyashita, Mitsunori.

In: American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 7, 01.08.2017, p. 622-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shimizu, Megumi ; Fujisawa, Daisuke ; Kurihara, Miho ; Sato, Kazuki ; Morita, Tatsuya ; Kato, Masashi ; Miyashita, Mitsunori. / Validation Study for the Brief Measure of Quality of Life and Quality of Care : A Questionnaire for the National Random Sampling Hospital Survey. In: American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 34, No. 7. pp. 622-631.
@article{4c9ad1e5700b4a56b45809210c49204e,
title = "Validation Study for the Brief Measure of Quality of Life and Quality of Care: A Questionnaire for the National Random Sampling Hospital Survey",
abstract = "Background: To monitor quality of life (QOL) for patients with cancer in a large population-based survey, we developed a short QOL and quality-of-care (QOC) questionnaire. To determine the validity and reliability of this new questionnaire for evaluating QOL in patients with cancer. Methods: Outpatients and inpatients at National Cancer Center Hospital East were administered a questionnaire, including the following items—the short QOL and QOC questionnaire (physical distress, pain, emotional distress, walk burden, and need for help with self-care; perceived general health status; and satisfaction with medical care and treatment by doctor, communication with doctor, support by health-care staff other than doctor, care for physical symptoms such as pain, and psychological care), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General (FACT-G), the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale (CCES) for patients, and demographic and medical data. We then readministered the short QOL and QOC questionnaire. Results: In total, 329 outpatients and 239 inpatients completed the survey (response rates: 80{\%} and 90{\%}, respectively). Total Cronbach α for the short QOL and QOC questionnaire was 0.83 for outpatients and 0.82 for inpatients. Items of the questionnaire correlated with cancer-specific measurements, FACT-G, and CCES. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all items of the questionnaire were 0.79 and 0.89 in each setting. Items of QOL and QOC did not correlate with each other. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of the short QOL and QOC questionnaire appear sufficient. This questionnaire enables continuous monitoring of patient QOL in large population-based surveys.",
keywords = "neoplasms, quality-of-care questionnaire, quality-of-life questionnaire, reliability, validity",
author = "Megumi Shimizu and Daisuke Fujisawa and Miho Kurihara and Kazuki Sato and Tatsuya Morita and Masashi Kato and Mitsunori Miyashita",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049909117693576",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "622--631",
journal = "American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1049-9091",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation Study for the Brief Measure of Quality of Life and Quality of Care

T2 - A Questionnaire for the National Random Sampling Hospital Survey

AU - Shimizu, Megumi

AU - Fujisawa, Daisuke

AU - Kurihara, Miho

AU - Sato, Kazuki

AU - Morita, Tatsuya

AU - Kato, Masashi

AU - Miyashita, Mitsunori

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Background: To monitor quality of life (QOL) for patients with cancer in a large population-based survey, we developed a short QOL and quality-of-care (QOC) questionnaire. To determine the validity and reliability of this new questionnaire for evaluating QOL in patients with cancer. Methods: Outpatients and inpatients at National Cancer Center Hospital East were administered a questionnaire, including the following items—the short QOL and QOC questionnaire (physical distress, pain, emotional distress, walk burden, and need for help with self-care; perceived general health status; and satisfaction with medical care and treatment by doctor, communication with doctor, support by health-care staff other than doctor, care for physical symptoms such as pain, and psychological care), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General (FACT-G), the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale (CCES) for patients, and demographic and medical data. We then readministered the short QOL and QOC questionnaire. Results: In total, 329 outpatients and 239 inpatients completed the survey (response rates: 80% and 90%, respectively). Total Cronbach α for the short QOL and QOC questionnaire was 0.83 for outpatients and 0.82 for inpatients. Items of the questionnaire correlated with cancer-specific measurements, FACT-G, and CCES. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all items of the questionnaire were 0.79 and 0.89 in each setting. Items of QOL and QOC did not correlate with each other. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of the short QOL and QOC questionnaire appear sufficient. This questionnaire enables continuous monitoring of patient QOL in large population-based surveys.

AB - Background: To monitor quality of life (QOL) for patients with cancer in a large population-based survey, we developed a short QOL and quality-of-care (QOC) questionnaire. To determine the validity and reliability of this new questionnaire for evaluating QOL in patients with cancer. Methods: Outpatients and inpatients at National Cancer Center Hospital East were administered a questionnaire, including the following items—the short QOL and QOC questionnaire (physical distress, pain, emotional distress, walk burden, and need for help with self-care; perceived general health status; and satisfaction with medical care and treatment by doctor, communication with doctor, support by health-care staff other than doctor, care for physical symptoms such as pain, and psychological care), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General (FACT-G), the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale (CCES) for patients, and demographic and medical data. We then readministered the short QOL and QOC questionnaire. Results: In total, 329 outpatients and 239 inpatients completed the survey (response rates: 80% and 90%, respectively). Total Cronbach α for the short QOL and QOC questionnaire was 0.83 for outpatients and 0.82 for inpatients. Items of the questionnaire correlated with cancer-specific measurements, FACT-G, and CCES. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all items of the questionnaire were 0.79 and 0.89 in each setting. Items of QOL and QOC did not correlate with each other. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of the short QOL and QOC questionnaire appear sufficient. This questionnaire enables continuous monitoring of patient QOL in large population-based surveys.

KW - neoplasms

KW - quality-of-care questionnaire

KW - quality-of-life questionnaire

KW - reliability

KW - validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024101423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024101423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049909117693576

DO - 10.1177/1049909117693576

M3 - Article

C2 - 28273759

AN - SCOPUS:85024101423

VL - 34

SP - 622

EP - 631

JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

SN - 1049-9091

IS - 7

ER -