Validity and reliability of the japanese version of the selected anger expression scale and age, sex, occupation and regional differences in anger expression among Japanese

Tetsuya Ohira, Hiroyasu Iso, Takeshi Tanigawa, Tomoko Sankai, Hironori Imano, Tomonori Okamura, Masahiko Kiyama, Akihiko Kitamura, Yuko Nakagawa, Shinichi Sato, Yoshihiko Naito, Minoru Lida, Takashi Shimamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Japanese version of the Anger Expression Scale among four Japanese communities, and to examine distributions of anger expression scores according to sex, age, occupation, and community, we performed a crosssectional study among 1,802 men and 3,229 women aged 20-70 in four geographic populations in 1995-97. We handed a self-administered questionnaire, which was selected from the Spielberger Anger Expression Scale, to the participants in the risk factor surveys and measured anger-in and anger-out as the anger expression scale. These scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97-0.98 for anger-out and 0.77-0.86 for angerin) and were of almost the same structure as the original. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the anger expression scale examined in 1995 and 1996 were 0.69 for anger-out and 0.57 for anger-in (both p<0.001). The mean scores of both anger-out and anger-in were inversely associated with age. The mean anger-out score was higher for men than for women (p<0.001), whereas the mean anger-in score did not vary significantly between the sexes. Furthermore, the mean scores of anger-out and anger-in varied among populations and occupational groups. The present study suggests that the Japanese version of the selected Anger Expression Scale is an acceptable scale for evaluatinq anger expression among Japanese.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-123
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Epidemiology
Volume10
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anger
Occupations
Reproducibility of Results
Occupational Groups

Keywords

  • Anger expression scale
  • Cross-sectional study
  • Population-based survey
  • Questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Validity and reliability of the japanese version of the selected anger expression scale and age, sex, occupation and regional differences in anger expression among Japanese. / Ohira, Tetsuya; Iso, Hiroyasu; Tanigawa, Takeshi; Sankai, Tomoko; Imano, Hironori; Okamura, Tomonori; Kiyama, Masahiko; Kitamura, Akihiko; Nakagawa, Yuko; Sato, Shinichi; Naito, Yoshihiko; Lida, Minoru; Shimamoto, Takashi.

In: Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2000, p. 118-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ohira, T, Iso, H, Tanigawa, T, Sankai, T, Imano, H, Okamura, T, Kiyama, M, Kitamura, A, Nakagawa, Y, Sato, S, Naito, Y, Lida, M & Shimamoto, T 2000, 'Validity and reliability of the japanese version of the selected anger expression scale and age, sex, occupation and regional differences in anger expression among Japanese', Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 118-123.
Ohira, Tetsuya ; Iso, Hiroyasu ; Tanigawa, Takeshi ; Sankai, Tomoko ; Imano, Hironori ; Okamura, Tomonori ; Kiyama, Masahiko ; Kitamura, Akihiko ; Nakagawa, Yuko ; Sato, Shinichi ; Naito, Yoshihiko ; Lida, Minoru ; Shimamoto, Takashi. / Validity and reliability of the japanese version of the selected anger expression scale and age, sex, occupation and regional differences in anger expression among Japanese. In: Journal of Epidemiology. 2000 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 118-123.
@article{54a7d271faa2457abd12cbeab7c0432c,
title = "Validity and reliability of the japanese version of the selected anger expression scale and age, sex, occupation and regional differences in anger expression among Japanese",
abstract = "To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Japanese version of the Anger Expression Scale among four Japanese communities, and to examine distributions of anger expression scores according to sex, age, occupation, and community, we performed a crosssectional study among 1,802 men and 3,229 women aged 20-70 in four geographic populations in 1995-97. We handed a self-administered questionnaire, which was selected from the Spielberger Anger Expression Scale, to the participants in the risk factor surveys and measured anger-in and anger-out as the anger expression scale. These scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97-0.98 for anger-out and 0.77-0.86 for angerin) and were of almost the same structure as the original. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the anger expression scale examined in 1995 and 1996 were 0.69 for anger-out and 0.57 for anger-in (both p<0.001). The mean scores of both anger-out and anger-in were inversely associated with age. The mean anger-out score was higher for men than for women (p<0.001), whereas the mean anger-in score did not vary significantly between the sexes. Furthermore, the mean scores of anger-out and anger-in varied among populations and occupational groups. The present study suggests that the Japanese version of the selected Anger Expression Scale is an acceptable scale for evaluatinq anger expression among Japanese.",
keywords = "Anger expression scale, Cross-sectional study, Population-based survey, Questionnaire",
author = "Tetsuya Ohira and Hiroyasu Iso and Takeshi Tanigawa and Tomoko Sankai and Hironori Imano and Tomonori Okamura and Masahiko Kiyama and Akihiko Kitamura and Yuko Nakagawa and Shinichi Sato and Yoshihiko Naito and Minoru Lida and Takashi Shimamoto",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "118--123",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0917-5040",
publisher = "Japan Epidemiology Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and reliability of the japanese version of the selected anger expression scale and age, sex, occupation and regional differences in anger expression among Japanese

AU - Ohira, Tetsuya

AU - Iso, Hiroyasu

AU - Tanigawa, Takeshi

AU - Sankai, Tomoko

AU - Imano, Hironori

AU - Okamura, Tomonori

AU - Kiyama, Masahiko

AU - Kitamura, Akihiko

AU - Nakagawa, Yuko

AU - Sato, Shinichi

AU - Naito, Yoshihiko

AU - Lida, Minoru

AU - Shimamoto, Takashi

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Japanese version of the Anger Expression Scale among four Japanese communities, and to examine distributions of anger expression scores according to sex, age, occupation, and community, we performed a crosssectional study among 1,802 men and 3,229 women aged 20-70 in four geographic populations in 1995-97. We handed a self-administered questionnaire, which was selected from the Spielberger Anger Expression Scale, to the participants in the risk factor surveys and measured anger-in and anger-out as the anger expression scale. These scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97-0.98 for anger-out and 0.77-0.86 for angerin) and were of almost the same structure as the original. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the anger expression scale examined in 1995 and 1996 were 0.69 for anger-out and 0.57 for anger-in (both p<0.001). The mean scores of both anger-out and anger-in were inversely associated with age. The mean anger-out score was higher for men than for women (p<0.001), whereas the mean anger-in score did not vary significantly between the sexes. Furthermore, the mean scores of anger-out and anger-in varied among populations and occupational groups. The present study suggests that the Japanese version of the selected Anger Expression Scale is an acceptable scale for evaluatinq anger expression among Japanese.

AB - To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Japanese version of the Anger Expression Scale among four Japanese communities, and to examine distributions of anger expression scores according to sex, age, occupation, and community, we performed a crosssectional study among 1,802 men and 3,229 women aged 20-70 in four geographic populations in 1995-97. We handed a self-administered questionnaire, which was selected from the Spielberger Anger Expression Scale, to the participants in the risk factor surveys and measured anger-in and anger-out as the anger expression scale. These scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97-0.98 for anger-out and 0.77-0.86 for angerin) and were of almost the same structure as the original. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the anger expression scale examined in 1995 and 1996 were 0.69 for anger-out and 0.57 for anger-in (both p<0.001). The mean scores of both anger-out and anger-in were inversely associated with age. The mean anger-out score was higher for men than for women (p<0.001), whereas the mean anger-in score did not vary significantly between the sexes. Furthermore, the mean scores of anger-out and anger-in varied among populations and occupational groups. The present study suggests that the Japanese version of the selected Anger Expression Scale is an acceptable scale for evaluatinq anger expression among Japanese.

KW - Anger expression scale

KW - Cross-sectional study

KW - Population-based survey

KW - Questionnaire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849187283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849187283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 118

EP - 123

JO - Journal of Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0917-5040

IS - 2

ER -