Vena caval flow patterns in patients with constrictive pericarditis: Analysis by catheter-tip Doppler flowmetry

K. Fukuda, S. Handa, S. Abe, S. Kyotani, S. Inoue, K. Negishi, T. Satoh, S. Hori, Y. Nakamura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Changes in superior and inferior vena caval flow patterns were analyzed in 5 patients with constrictive pericarditis and were compared with those of 10 normal control subjects. Caval flows were measured using catheter-tip Doppler flowmeters. The normal controls showed biphasic M-shaped flow patterns; the peaks of the first forward flow (S wave) and of the second forward flow (D wave) appeared coincident with mid-systole and mid-diastole, respectively. Reverse flows fell during the atrial contraction period (A wave) and late systole (V wave). In the normal controls, the ratios of the S wave to the D wave (S/D ratio) and the A wave to the S wave (A/S ratio) were 2.15 ± 0.41 and 0.18 ± 0.10, respectively, and there was a disproportionate respiratory variation in the S and D waves in the normal controls. In constrictive pericarditis, superior and inferior vena caval flow velocities were lower than those in the normal controls. The S/D and A/S ratios were 1.46 ± 0.27 (p < 0.05 vs control) and 0.66 ± 0.15 (p < 0.01 vs control), respectively, with the A wave increasing in proportion to the severity of constrictive pericarditis. In addition, there was only a minimal respiratory variation in constrictive pericarditis. In conclusion, recognition of the patterns of the superior and inferior vena caval flow velocities may be useful for diagnosing constrictivc pericarditis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)415-422
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiology
Volume21
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1991 Dec 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vena caval flow patterns in patients with constrictive pericarditis: Analysis by catheter-tip Doppler flowmetry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this