Verb raising in American sign language

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous researchers have suggested that the base-generated word order in ASL is Subject-Verb-Object (Fischer, 1987; Liddell, 1980). However, there are some constructions which apparently contradict this assumption. Among these constructions are the phenomena of Verb Sandwich (Fischer and Janis, 1992), Verb Final (Romano, 1991), and Object Raising (Liddell, 1980). All three sentence types contain verbs with an aspectual marker. Unlike its uninflected counterpart, an inflected verb in these constructions appears in the sentence-final position, which is not assumed to be the basic position for ASL verbs. I propose a unified account for these three ASL constructions and consider its theoretical implications for the theory of verbal morphology. I extend the idea of the Movement Analysis of Verb Sandwich, proposed in Fischer and Janis (1992). Based on the Minimalist approach proposed in Chomsky (1995), I argue that the derivations of all three sentence patterns involve overt verb raising to Infl. The verb movement to Infl occurs to save the otherwise stranded [asp] affix, even though the verb itself does not have motivation to raise overtly. Hence, this verb raising is a syntactic operation driven by Enlightened Self Interest (Lasnik, 1995a,b). In our discussion, it is shown that Chomsky's (1995) Checking Theory faces empirical problems in accounting for the ASL phenomena in question. I will present an alternative analysis, which is crucially based on a proposal of Lasnik (1995c) that regular verbs are selected from the lexicon uninflected. The Object Raising is analyzed as an instance of Holmberg's generalization (Branigan, 1992), which states that overt object shift is possible only when the verb is overtly raised out of VP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-149
Number of pages23
JournalLingua
Volume103
Issue number2-3
Publication statusPublished - 1997 Nov
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

language
American Sign Language
Verbs
Noam Chomsky

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Verb raising in American sign language. / Matsuoka, Kazumi.

In: Lingua, Vol. 103, No. 2-3, 11.1997, p. 127-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matsuoka, K 1997, 'Verb raising in American sign language', Lingua, vol. 103, no. 2-3, pp. 127-149.
Matsuoka, Kazumi. / Verb raising in American sign language. In: Lingua. 1997 ; Vol. 103, No. 2-3. pp. 127-149.
@article{2c4d84d15d404e9385f4b4bda672df01,
title = "Verb raising in American sign language",
abstract = "Previous researchers have suggested that the base-generated word order in ASL is Subject-Verb-Object (Fischer, 1987; Liddell, 1980). However, there are some constructions which apparently contradict this assumption. Among these constructions are the phenomena of Verb Sandwich (Fischer and Janis, 1992), Verb Final (Romano, 1991), and Object Raising (Liddell, 1980). All three sentence types contain verbs with an aspectual marker. Unlike its uninflected counterpart, an inflected verb in these constructions appears in the sentence-final position, which is not assumed to be the basic position for ASL verbs. I propose a unified account for these three ASL constructions and consider its theoretical implications for the theory of verbal morphology. I extend the idea of the Movement Analysis of Verb Sandwich, proposed in Fischer and Janis (1992). Based on the Minimalist approach proposed in Chomsky (1995), I argue that the derivations of all three sentence patterns involve overt verb raising to Infl. The verb movement to Infl occurs to save the otherwise stranded [asp] affix, even though the verb itself does not have motivation to raise overtly. Hence, this verb raising is a syntactic operation driven by Enlightened Self Interest (Lasnik, 1995a,b). In our discussion, it is shown that Chomsky's (1995) Checking Theory faces empirical problems in accounting for the ASL phenomena in question. I will present an alternative analysis, which is crucially based on a proposal of Lasnik (1995c) that regular verbs are selected from the lexicon uninflected. The Object Raising is analyzed as an instance of Holmberg's generalization (Branigan, 1992), which states that overt object shift is possible only when the verb is overtly raised out of VP.",
author = "Kazumi Matsuoka",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "127--149",
journal = "Lingua",
issn = "0024-3841",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Verb raising in American sign language

AU - Matsuoka, Kazumi

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - Previous researchers have suggested that the base-generated word order in ASL is Subject-Verb-Object (Fischer, 1987; Liddell, 1980). However, there are some constructions which apparently contradict this assumption. Among these constructions are the phenomena of Verb Sandwich (Fischer and Janis, 1992), Verb Final (Romano, 1991), and Object Raising (Liddell, 1980). All three sentence types contain verbs with an aspectual marker. Unlike its uninflected counterpart, an inflected verb in these constructions appears in the sentence-final position, which is not assumed to be the basic position for ASL verbs. I propose a unified account for these three ASL constructions and consider its theoretical implications for the theory of verbal morphology. I extend the idea of the Movement Analysis of Verb Sandwich, proposed in Fischer and Janis (1992). Based on the Minimalist approach proposed in Chomsky (1995), I argue that the derivations of all three sentence patterns involve overt verb raising to Infl. The verb movement to Infl occurs to save the otherwise stranded [asp] affix, even though the verb itself does not have motivation to raise overtly. Hence, this verb raising is a syntactic operation driven by Enlightened Self Interest (Lasnik, 1995a,b). In our discussion, it is shown that Chomsky's (1995) Checking Theory faces empirical problems in accounting for the ASL phenomena in question. I will present an alternative analysis, which is crucially based on a proposal of Lasnik (1995c) that regular verbs are selected from the lexicon uninflected. The Object Raising is analyzed as an instance of Holmberg's generalization (Branigan, 1992), which states that overt object shift is possible only when the verb is overtly raised out of VP.

AB - Previous researchers have suggested that the base-generated word order in ASL is Subject-Verb-Object (Fischer, 1987; Liddell, 1980). However, there are some constructions which apparently contradict this assumption. Among these constructions are the phenomena of Verb Sandwich (Fischer and Janis, 1992), Verb Final (Romano, 1991), and Object Raising (Liddell, 1980). All three sentence types contain verbs with an aspectual marker. Unlike its uninflected counterpart, an inflected verb in these constructions appears in the sentence-final position, which is not assumed to be the basic position for ASL verbs. I propose a unified account for these three ASL constructions and consider its theoretical implications for the theory of verbal morphology. I extend the idea of the Movement Analysis of Verb Sandwich, proposed in Fischer and Janis (1992). Based on the Minimalist approach proposed in Chomsky (1995), I argue that the derivations of all three sentence patterns involve overt verb raising to Infl. The verb movement to Infl occurs to save the otherwise stranded [asp] affix, even though the verb itself does not have motivation to raise overtly. Hence, this verb raising is a syntactic operation driven by Enlightened Self Interest (Lasnik, 1995a,b). In our discussion, it is shown that Chomsky's (1995) Checking Theory faces empirical problems in accounting for the ASL phenomena in question. I will present an alternative analysis, which is crucially based on a proposal of Lasnik (1995c) that regular verbs are selected from the lexicon uninflected. The Object Raising is analyzed as an instance of Holmberg's generalization (Branigan, 1992), which states that overt object shift is possible only when the verb is overtly raised out of VP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242370878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242370878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0242370878

VL - 103

SP - 127

EP - 149

JO - Lingua

JF - Lingua

SN - 0024-3841

IS - 2-3

ER -