Visualization of tumor vessels in renal tumors: Comparison between power Doppler ultrasonography and angiography

Yoshiko Tamura, Masahiro Jinzaki, K. Ohkuma, Y. Narimatsu, S. Hashimoto, Akihiro Tanimoto, K. Hiramatsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the ability of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) with that of renal angiography for assessment of renal tumor vessels. Material and Methods: We performed PDUS and angiography in 52 histologically proven renal parenchymal tumors (50 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and 2 oncocytomas), and compared vascularity on PDUS and angiography. The vascularity of PDUS was graded as follows: grade 0 - no recognizable tumor vessel; grade 1 - hypovascular to surrounding renal interlobar arteries; grade 2 - hyper-or isovascular to surrounding renal interlobar arteries. Results: With PDUS, 41 tumors were grade 2 and 11 were grade 1. With angiography, 44 lesions had iso/hypervascular pattern, 6 hypovascular pattern, and 2 were judged to be avascular. Among 44 iso/hypervascular tumors, 41 were grade 2, and 3 were grade 1. These latter 3 were located deeper than 7 cm. Six hypovascular tumors and 2 avascular tumors were grade 1. The 2 avascular tumors were small and hypovascular. The κ-level of agreement was 0.81. Conclusion: There was very good agreement betweeen PDUS and angiography in visualizing renal tumor vessels. PDUS appears appropriate for assessing renal tumor vascularity as compared to angiography in small and hypovascular lesions, but deep location reduced the detectability of tumor vessels with PDUS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-243
Number of pages5
JournalActa Radiologica
Volume42
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2001 Mar

Fingerprint

Doppler Ultrasonography
Angiography
Kidney
Neoplasms
Renal Artery
Oxyphilic Adenoma
Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Angiography
  • Kidney, renal cell carcinoma
  • Power Doppler ultrasonography
  • Tumor vascularity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Visualization of tumor vessels in renal tumors : Comparison between power Doppler ultrasonography and angiography. / Tamura, Yoshiko; Jinzaki, Masahiro; Ohkuma, K.; Narimatsu, Y.; Hashimoto, S.; Tanimoto, Akihiro; Hiramatsu, K.

In: Acta Radiologica, Vol. 42, No. 2, 03.2001, p. 239-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tamura, Y, Jinzaki, M, Ohkuma, K, Narimatsu, Y, Hashimoto, S, Tanimoto, A & Hiramatsu, K 2001, 'Visualization of tumor vessels in renal tumors: Comparison between power Doppler ultrasonography and angiography', Acta Radiologica, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 239-243.
Tamura, Yoshiko ; Jinzaki, Masahiro ; Ohkuma, K. ; Narimatsu, Y. ; Hashimoto, S. ; Tanimoto, Akihiro ; Hiramatsu, K. / Visualization of tumor vessels in renal tumors : Comparison between power Doppler ultrasonography and angiography. In: Acta Radiologica. 2001 ; Vol. 42, No. 2. pp. 239-243.
@article{0bdfeb5c48964ed193cdcc1b848fc6db,
title = "Visualization of tumor vessels in renal tumors: Comparison between power Doppler ultrasonography and angiography",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the ability of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) with that of renal angiography for assessment of renal tumor vessels. Material and Methods: We performed PDUS and angiography in 52 histologically proven renal parenchymal tumors (50 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and 2 oncocytomas), and compared vascularity on PDUS and angiography. The vascularity of PDUS was graded as follows: grade 0 - no recognizable tumor vessel; grade 1 - hypovascular to surrounding renal interlobar arteries; grade 2 - hyper-or isovascular to surrounding renal interlobar arteries. Results: With PDUS, 41 tumors were grade 2 and 11 were grade 1. With angiography, 44 lesions had iso/hypervascular pattern, 6 hypovascular pattern, and 2 were judged to be avascular. Among 44 iso/hypervascular tumors, 41 were grade 2, and 3 were grade 1. These latter 3 were located deeper than 7 cm. Six hypovascular tumors and 2 avascular tumors were grade 1. The 2 avascular tumors were small and hypovascular. The κ-level of agreement was 0.81. Conclusion: There was very good agreement betweeen PDUS and angiography in visualizing renal tumor vessels. PDUS appears appropriate for assessing renal tumor vascularity as compared to angiography in small and hypovascular lesions, but deep location reduced the detectability of tumor vessels with PDUS.",
keywords = "Angiography, Kidney, renal cell carcinoma, Power Doppler ultrasonography, Tumor vascularity",
author = "Yoshiko Tamura and Masahiro Jinzaki and K. Ohkuma and Y. Narimatsu and S. Hashimoto and Akihiro Tanimoto and K. Hiramatsu",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "239--243",
journal = "Acta Radiologica",
issn = "0284-1851",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visualization of tumor vessels in renal tumors

T2 - Comparison between power Doppler ultrasonography and angiography

AU - Tamura, Yoshiko

AU - Jinzaki, Masahiro

AU - Ohkuma, K.

AU - Narimatsu, Y.

AU - Hashimoto, S.

AU - Tanimoto, Akihiro

AU - Hiramatsu, K.

PY - 2001/3

Y1 - 2001/3

N2 - Purpose: To compare the ability of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) with that of renal angiography for assessment of renal tumor vessels. Material and Methods: We performed PDUS and angiography in 52 histologically proven renal parenchymal tumors (50 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and 2 oncocytomas), and compared vascularity on PDUS and angiography. The vascularity of PDUS was graded as follows: grade 0 - no recognizable tumor vessel; grade 1 - hypovascular to surrounding renal interlobar arteries; grade 2 - hyper-or isovascular to surrounding renal interlobar arteries. Results: With PDUS, 41 tumors were grade 2 and 11 were grade 1. With angiography, 44 lesions had iso/hypervascular pattern, 6 hypovascular pattern, and 2 were judged to be avascular. Among 44 iso/hypervascular tumors, 41 were grade 2, and 3 were grade 1. These latter 3 were located deeper than 7 cm. Six hypovascular tumors and 2 avascular tumors were grade 1. The 2 avascular tumors were small and hypovascular. The κ-level of agreement was 0.81. Conclusion: There was very good agreement betweeen PDUS and angiography in visualizing renal tumor vessels. PDUS appears appropriate for assessing renal tumor vascularity as compared to angiography in small and hypovascular lesions, but deep location reduced the detectability of tumor vessels with PDUS.

AB - Purpose: To compare the ability of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) with that of renal angiography for assessment of renal tumor vessels. Material and Methods: We performed PDUS and angiography in 52 histologically proven renal parenchymal tumors (50 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and 2 oncocytomas), and compared vascularity on PDUS and angiography. The vascularity of PDUS was graded as follows: grade 0 - no recognizable tumor vessel; grade 1 - hypovascular to surrounding renal interlobar arteries; grade 2 - hyper-or isovascular to surrounding renal interlobar arteries. Results: With PDUS, 41 tumors were grade 2 and 11 were grade 1. With angiography, 44 lesions had iso/hypervascular pattern, 6 hypovascular pattern, and 2 were judged to be avascular. Among 44 iso/hypervascular tumors, 41 were grade 2, and 3 were grade 1. These latter 3 were located deeper than 7 cm. Six hypovascular tumors and 2 avascular tumors were grade 1. The 2 avascular tumors were small and hypovascular. The κ-level of agreement was 0.81. Conclusion: There was very good agreement betweeen PDUS and angiography in visualizing renal tumor vessels. PDUS appears appropriate for assessing renal tumor vascularity as compared to angiography in small and hypovascular lesions, but deep location reduced the detectability of tumor vessels with PDUS.

KW - Angiography

KW - Kidney, renal cell carcinoma

KW - Power Doppler ultrasonography

KW - Tumor vascularity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035263551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035263551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11259955

AN - SCOPUS:0035263551

VL - 42

SP - 239

EP - 243

JO - Acta Radiologica

JF - Acta Radiologica

SN - 0284-1851

IS - 2

ER -