What happens between pure hydraulic and buckling mechanisms of blowout fractures?

Tomohisa Nagasao, Junpei Miyamoto, Yusuke Shimizu, Hua Jiang, Tatsuo Nakajima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The present study aims to evaluate how the ratio of the hydraulic and buckling mechanisms affects blowout fracture patterns, when these two mechanisms work simultaneously. Materials and methods: Three-dimensional computer-aided-design (CAD)models were generated simulating ten skulls. To simulate impact, 1.2 J was applied on the orbital region of these models in four patterns. Pattern 1: All the energy works to cause the hydraulic effect. Pattern 2: Two-thirds of the energy works to cause the hydraulic effect; one-third of the energy works to cause the buckling effect. Pattern 3: One-third of the energy works to cause the hydraulic effect; two-thirds of the energy works to cause the buckling effect. Pattern 4: The entire energy quantum works to cause the buckling effect. Using the finite element method, the regions where fractures were theoretically expected to occur were calculated and were compared between the four patterns. Results: More fracture damage occurred for Pattern 1 than Pattern 2, and for Pattern 3 than for Pattern 4. Conclusion: The hydraulic and buckling mechanisms interact with one another. When these two mechanisms are combined, the orbital walls tend to develop serious fractures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)306-313
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jun 1

Keywords

  • blowout fracture
  • finite element method
  • orbit
  • simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What happens between pure hydraulic and buckling mechanisms of blowout fractures?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this