What should we know to develop an information robot?

Satoru Satake, Keita Nakatani, Kotaro Hayashi, Takyuki Kanda, Michita Imai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is aimed at identifying the required knowledge for information robots. We addressed two aspects of this knowledge, 'what should it know' and 'what should it do.' The first part of this study was devoted to the former aspect. We investigated what information staff know and what people expect from information robots. We found that there are a lot of similarities. Based on this, we developed a knowledge structure about an environment to be used to provide information. The developed knowledge structure worked well. In the field study we confirmed that the robot was able to answer most of the requests (96.6%). However, regarding the latter aspect, although we initially replicated what human staff members do, the robot did not serve well.Many users hesitated to speak, and remained quiet. Here, we found that the knowledge for facilitating interaction was missing. We further designed the interaction flow to accommodate people who tend to be quiet. Finally, our field study revealed that the improved interaction flow increased the success ratio of information providing from54.4% to 84.5%.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere8
JournalPeerJ
Volume2015
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

robots
Robots
Flow interactions

Keywords

  • Belief about robots
  • Direction giving
  • Information-providing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Satake, S., Nakatani, K., Hayashi, K., Kanda, T., & Imai, M. (2015). What should we know to develop an information robot? PeerJ, 2015(1), [e8]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.8

What should we know to develop an information robot? / Satake, Satoru; Nakatani, Keita; Hayashi, Kotaro; Kanda, Takyuki; Imai, Michita.

In: PeerJ, Vol. 2015, No. 1, e8, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Satake, S, Nakatani, K, Hayashi, K, Kanda, T & Imai, M 2015, 'What should we know to develop an information robot?', PeerJ, vol. 2015, no. 1, e8. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.8
Satake, Satoru ; Nakatani, Keita ; Hayashi, Kotaro ; Kanda, Takyuki ; Imai, Michita. / What should we know to develop an information robot?. In: PeerJ. 2015 ; Vol. 2015, No. 1.
@article{b575912efdab4f0d952da47ed046d71b,
title = "What should we know to develop an information robot?",
abstract = "This paper is aimed at identifying the required knowledge for information robots. We addressed two aspects of this knowledge, 'what should it know' and 'what should it do.' The first part of this study was devoted to the former aspect. We investigated what information staff know and what people expect from information robots. We found that there are a lot of similarities. Based on this, we developed a knowledge structure about an environment to be used to provide information. The developed knowledge structure worked well. In the field study we confirmed that the robot was able to answer most of the requests (96.6{\%}). However, regarding the latter aspect, although we initially replicated what human staff members do, the robot did not serve well.Many users hesitated to speak, and remained quiet. Here, we found that the knowledge for facilitating interaction was missing. We further designed the interaction flow to accommodate people who tend to be quiet. Finally, our field study revealed that the improved interaction flow increased the success ratio of information providing from54.4{\%} to 84.5{\%}.",
keywords = "Belief about robots, Direction giving, Information-providing",
author = "Satoru Satake and Keita Nakatani and Kotaro Hayashi and Takyuki Kanda and Michita Imai",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.7717/peerj-cs.8",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
journal = "PeerJ",
issn = "2167-8359",
publisher = "PeerJ",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What should we know to develop an information robot?

AU - Satake, Satoru

AU - Nakatani, Keita

AU - Hayashi, Kotaro

AU - Kanda, Takyuki

AU - Imai, Michita

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper is aimed at identifying the required knowledge for information robots. We addressed two aspects of this knowledge, 'what should it know' and 'what should it do.' The first part of this study was devoted to the former aspect. We investigated what information staff know and what people expect from information robots. We found that there are a lot of similarities. Based on this, we developed a knowledge structure about an environment to be used to provide information. The developed knowledge structure worked well. In the field study we confirmed that the robot was able to answer most of the requests (96.6%). However, regarding the latter aspect, although we initially replicated what human staff members do, the robot did not serve well.Many users hesitated to speak, and remained quiet. Here, we found that the knowledge for facilitating interaction was missing. We further designed the interaction flow to accommodate people who tend to be quiet. Finally, our field study revealed that the improved interaction flow increased the success ratio of information providing from54.4% to 84.5%.

AB - This paper is aimed at identifying the required knowledge for information robots. We addressed two aspects of this knowledge, 'what should it know' and 'what should it do.' The first part of this study was devoted to the former aspect. We investigated what information staff know and what people expect from information robots. We found that there are a lot of similarities. Based on this, we developed a knowledge structure about an environment to be used to provide information. The developed knowledge structure worked well. In the field study we confirmed that the robot was able to answer most of the requests (96.6%). However, regarding the latter aspect, although we initially replicated what human staff members do, the robot did not serve well.Many users hesitated to speak, and remained quiet. Here, we found that the knowledge for facilitating interaction was missing. We further designed the interaction flow to accommodate people who tend to be quiet. Finally, our field study revealed that the improved interaction flow increased the success ratio of information providing from54.4% to 84.5%.

KW - Belief about robots

KW - Direction giving

KW - Information-providing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017741427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017741427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7717/peerj-cs.8

DO - 10.7717/peerj-cs.8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017741427

VL - 2015

JO - PeerJ

JF - PeerJ

SN - 2167-8359

IS - 1

M1 - e8

ER -