TY - JOUR
T1 - Why are firms that export cleaner? International trade, abatement and environmental emissions
AU - Forslid, Rikard
AU - Okubo, Toshihiro
AU - Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene
N1 - Funding Information:
An earlier version of this paper was circulated as a CEPR Discussion Paper, see Forslid et.al. (2011) . We are grateful for comments from Andrew Bernard, Peter Egger, Peter Fredriksson, Beata Javorcik, Gordon Hanson, Peter Neary, Scott Taylor, Adrian Wood, and Tony Venables. Financial support from Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius' Research Foundation , The Swedish Research Council , Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research is gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - This paper proposes a detailed mechanism for why exporting firms may have a lower emission intensity when emissions are subject to an environmental tax. This mechanism of our model is supported by Swedish firm-level data. Our mechanism runs through firms’ endogenous investments in abatement. Firms’ abatement investments depend on their production volumes, since a larger scale allows them to spread the fixed costs of abatement investment across more units. Production volumes increase in firm productivity and, as a consequence, firms’ emission intensity is negatively related to firm productivity. Exporting also leads to higher production volumes and thereby to a lower emission intensity. Thus, trade has an effect on emissions independently of firm productivity. Trade therefore leads to higher but cleaner production. The overall effect of trade on emissions is neutral in our model. Trade liberalization does not affect aggregate emissions in our benchmark case of symmetric countries.
AB - This paper proposes a detailed mechanism for why exporting firms may have a lower emission intensity when emissions are subject to an environmental tax. This mechanism of our model is supported by Swedish firm-level data. Our mechanism runs through firms’ endogenous investments in abatement. Firms’ abatement investments depend on their production volumes, since a larger scale allows them to spread the fixed costs of abatement investment across more units. Production volumes increase in firm productivity and, as a consequence, firms’ emission intensity is negatively related to firm productivity. Exporting also leads to higher production volumes and thereby to a lower emission intensity. Thus, trade has an effect on emissions independently of firm productivity. Trade therefore leads to higher but cleaner production. The overall effect of trade on emissions is neutral in our model. Trade liberalization does not affect aggregate emissions in our benchmark case of symmetric countries.
KW - Abatement
KW - Environmental emissions
KW - Heterogeneous firms
KW - International trade
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052319929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052319929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.07.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052319929
SN - 0095-0696
VL - 91
SP - 166
EP - 183
JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
ER -