Word order variability in Japanese conversation: Motivations and grammaticization

Tsuyoshi Ono, Ryoko Suzuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

is widely accepted that Japanese is a strict verb-final language. However, r examination of conversational data reveals cases where elements are pressed after the predicate. These exceptions can be divided into two pes. The first type involves a break in intonation between the predicate id the following element or elements. In this type, after the predicate is pressed, a certain element (or elements) is expressed for such purposes further specification and repair. In the second type, the predicate and the llowing element or elements are expressed within one intonation contour. his type is further divided into two subtypes: The discourse-pragmatic type id the emotive type. In the discourse-pragmatic type, the element or eleents after the predicate serve a certain discourse-pragmatic function. These ements include adverbials, conjunctions and pronouns, and either indicate e speaker's stance toward the proposition or referent or create discourse) hesiveness. In the emotive type, an adjectival or nominal predicate which expresses such feelings as surprise and disgust is followed by a demonstrative. It is accompanied by an emotional intonation pattern. In this subtype, non-canonical order seems to be preferred over canonical order. The intonational and distributional characteristics of the two subtypes thus suggest that the non-canonical word order is becoming grammaticized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-446
Number of pages18
JournalText
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Repair
conversation
Specifications
pragmatics
discourse
examination
Grammaticization
Intonation
Japanese Conversation
Discourse Pragmatics
language
Adverbials
Pragmatic Functions
Disgust
Verbs
Pronoun
Stance
Surprise
Emotion
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Word order variability in Japanese conversation : Motivations and grammaticization. / Ono, Tsuyoshi; Suzuki, Ryoko.

In: Text, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1992, p. 429-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{550c8ba894a3464b830206d69a79e77e,
title = "Word order variability in Japanese conversation: Motivations and grammaticization",
abstract = "is widely accepted that Japanese is a strict verb-final language. However, r examination of conversational data reveals cases where elements are pressed after the predicate. These exceptions can be divided into two pes. The first type involves a break in intonation between the predicate id the following element or elements. In this type, after the predicate is pressed, a certain element (or elements) is expressed for such purposes further specification and repair. In the second type, the predicate and the llowing element or elements are expressed within one intonation contour. his type is further divided into two subtypes: The discourse-pragmatic type id the emotive type. In the discourse-pragmatic type, the element or eleents after the predicate serve a certain discourse-pragmatic function. These ements include adverbials, conjunctions and pronouns, and either indicate e speaker's stance toward the proposition or referent or create discourse) hesiveness. In the emotive type, an adjectival or nominal predicate which expresses such feelings as surprise and disgust is followed by a demonstrative. It is accompanied by an emotional intonation pattern. In this subtype, non-canonical order seems to be preferred over canonical order. The intonational and distributional characteristics of the two subtypes thus suggest that the non-canonical word order is becoming grammaticized.",
author = "Tsuyoshi Ono and Ryoko Suzuki",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1515/text.1.1992.12.3.429",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "429--446",
journal = "Text and Talk",
issn = "1860-7330",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Word order variability in Japanese conversation

T2 - Motivations and grammaticization

AU - Ono, Tsuyoshi

AU - Suzuki, Ryoko

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - is widely accepted that Japanese is a strict verb-final language. However, r examination of conversational data reveals cases where elements are pressed after the predicate. These exceptions can be divided into two pes. The first type involves a break in intonation between the predicate id the following element or elements. In this type, after the predicate is pressed, a certain element (or elements) is expressed for such purposes further specification and repair. In the second type, the predicate and the llowing element or elements are expressed within one intonation contour. his type is further divided into two subtypes: The discourse-pragmatic type id the emotive type. In the discourse-pragmatic type, the element or eleents after the predicate serve a certain discourse-pragmatic function. These ements include adverbials, conjunctions and pronouns, and either indicate e speaker's stance toward the proposition or referent or create discourse) hesiveness. In the emotive type, an adjectival or nominal predicate which expresses such feelings as surprise and disgust is followed by a demonstrative. It is accompanied by an emotional intonation pattern. In this subtype, non-canonical order seems to be preferred over canonical order. The intonational and distributional characteristics of the two subtypes thus suggest that the non-canonical word order is becoming grammaticized.

AB - is widely accepted that Japanese is a strict verb-final language. However, r examination of conversational data reveals cases where elements are pressed after the predicate. These exceptions can be divided into two pes. The first type involves a break in intonation between the predicate id the following element or elements. In this type, after the predicate is pressed, a certain element (or elements) is expressed for such purposes further specification and repair. In the second type, the predicate and the llowing element or elements are expressed within one intonation contour. his type is further divided into two subtypes: The discourse-pragmatic type id the emotive type. In the discourse-pragmatic type, the element or eleents after the predicate serve a certain discourse-pragmatic function. These ements include adverbials, conjunctions and pronouns, and either indicate e speaker's stance toward the proposition or referent or create discourse) hesiveness. In the emotive type, an adjectival or nominal predicate which expresses such feelings as surprise and disgust is followed by a demonstrative. It is accompanied by an emotional intonation pattern. In this subtype, non-canonical order seems to be preferred over canonical order. The intonational and distributional characteristics of the two subtypes thus suggest that the non-canonical word order is becoming grammaticized.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000454612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000454612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/text.1.1992.12.3.429

DO - 10.1515/text.1.1992.12.3.429

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000454612

VL - 12

SP - 429

EP - 446

JO - Text and Talk

JF - Text and Talk

SN - 1860-7330

IS - 3

ER -