Work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict among Japanese dual-earner couples with preschool children: A spillover-crossover perspective

Akihito Shimazu, Kazumi Kubota, Arnold Bakker, Eva Demerouti, Kyoko Shimada, Norito Kawakami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study among Japanese dual-earner couples examined the independent and combined associations of work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC) with psychological health of employees and their partners and the relationship quality between partners. Methods: The matched responses of 895 couples were analyzed with logistic regression analysis to examine whether there were differences among the four work-family conflict groups (i.e., no conflict, WFC, FWC and both conflicts groups) in terms of own psychological distress, social undermining (i.e., negative behaviors directed toward the target person) reported by partners and partner's psychological distress. The no conflicts group was used as the reference group. Results: The both conflicts group had the highest odds ratios for own psychological distress and social undermining towards the partner for both genders. In addition, for husbands, the both conflicts group had the highest odds ratio for partner's psychological distress, whereas for wives, it did not. Conclusions: Dual experiences of WFC and FWC have adverse associations with psychological health of employees and relationship quality between partners of both genders. In addition, dual experiences in husbands have an adverse association with psychological health of their partners (i.e., wives), whereas this is not the case for wives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-243
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of occupational health
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Family Conflict
Preschool Children
Health
Spouses
Psychology
Personnel
Regression analysis
Logistics
Occupational Health
Odds Ratio
Conflict (Psychology)
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Conservation of Resource (COR) theory
  • Crossover
  • Psychological distress
  • Social undermining
  • Spillover
  • Work-family conflict

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict among Japanese dual-earner couples with preschool children : A spillover-crossover perspective. / Shimazu, Akihito; Kubota, Kazumi; Bakker, Arnold; Demerouti, Eva; Shimada, Kyoko; Kawakami, Norito.

In: Journal of occupational health, Vol. 55, No. 4, 01.01.2013, p. 234-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shimazu, Akihito ; Kubota, Kazumi ; Bakker, Arnold ; Demerouti, Eva ; Shimada, Kyoko ; Kawakami, Norito. / Work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict among Japanese dual-earner couples with preschool children : A spillover-crossover perspective. In: Journal of occupational health. 2013 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 234-243.
@article{79087ee858514965b7e5de8d3e21bc64,
title = "Work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict among Japanese dual-earner couples with preschool children: A spillover-crossover perspective",
abstract = "Objectives: This study among Japanese dual-earner couples examined the independent and combined associations of work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC) with psychological health of employees and their partners and the relationship quality between partners. Methods: The matched responses of 895 couples were analyzed with logistic regression analysis to examine whether there were differences among the four work-family conflict groups (i.e., no conflict, WFC, FWC and both conflicts groups) in terms of own psychological distress, social undermining (i.e., negative behaviors directed toward the target person) reported by partners and partner's psychological distress. The no conflicts group was used as the reference group. Results: The both conflicts group had the highest odds ratios for own psychological distress and social undermining towards the partner for both genders. In addition, for husbands, the both conflicts group had the highest odds ratio for partner's psychological distress, whereas for wives, it did not. Conclusions: Dual experiences of WFC and FWC have adverse associations with psychological health of employees and relationship quality between partners of both genders. In addition, dual experiences in husbands have an adverse association with psychological health of their partners (i.e., wives), whereas this is not the case for wives.",
keywords = "Conservation of Resource (COR) theory, Crossover, Psychological distress, Social undermining, Spillover, Work-family conflict",
author = "Akihito Shimazu and Kazumi Kubota and Arnold Bakker and Eva Demerouti and Kyoko Shimada and Norito Kawakami",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1539/joh.12-0252-OA",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "234--243",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Health",
issn = "1341-9145",
publisher = "Japan Society for Occupational Health",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict among Japanese dual-earner couples with preschool children

T2 - A spillover-crossover perspective

AU - Shimazu, Akihito

AU - Kubota, Kazumi

AU - Bakker, Arnold

AU - Demerouti, Eva

AU - Shimada, Kyoko

AU - Kawakami, Norito

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Objectives: This study among Japanese dual-earner couples examined the independent and combined associations of work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC) with psychological health of employees and their partners and the relationship quality between partners. Methods: The matched responses of 895 couples were analyzed with logistic regression analysis to examine whether there were differences among the four work-family conflict groups (i.e., no conflict, WFC, FWC and both conflicts groups) in terms of own psychological distress, social undermining (i.e., negative behaviors directed toward the target person) reported by partners and partner's psychological distress. The no conflicts group was used as the reference group. Results: The both conflicts group had the highest odds ratios for own psychological distress and social undermining towards the partner for both genders. In addition, for husbands, the both conflicts group had the highest odds ratio for partner's psychological distress, whereas for wives, it did not. Conclusions: Dual experiences of WFC and FWC have adverse associations with psychological health of employees and relationship quality between partners of both genders. In addition, dual experiences in husbands have an adverse association with psychological health of their partners (i.e., wives), whereas this is not the case for wives.

AB - Objectives: This study among Japanese dual-earner couples examined the independent and combined associations of work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC) with psychological health of employees and their partners and the relationship quality between partners. Methods: The matched responses of 895 couples were analyzed with logistic regression analysis to examine whether there were differences among the four work-family conflict groups (i.e., no conflict, WFC, FWC and both conflicts groups) in terms of own psychological distress, social undermining (i.e., negative behaviors directed toward the target person) reported by partners and partner's psychological distress. The no conflicts group was used as the reference group. Results: The both conflicts group had the highest odds ratios for own psychological distress and social undermining towards the partner for both genders. In addition, for husbands, the both conflicts group had the highest odds ratio for partner's psychological distress, whereas for wives, it did not. Conclusions: Dual experiences of WFC and FWC have adverse associations with psychological health of employees and relationship quality between partners of both genders. In addition, dual experiences in husbands have an adverse association with psychological health of their partners (i.e., wives), whereas this is not the case for wives.

KW - Conservation of Resource (COR) theory

KW - Crossover

KW - Psychological distress

KW - Social undermining

KW - Spillover

KW - Work-family conflict

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884915928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884915928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1539/joh.12-0252-OA

DO - 10.1539/joh.12-0252-OA

M3 - Article

C2 - 23748206

AN - SCOPUS:84884915928

VL - 55

SP - 234

EP - 243

JO - Journal of Occupational Health

JF - Journal of Occupational Health

SN - 1341-9145

IS - 4

ER -