Wynkyn de worde's lost manuscript of the canterbury tales: With new light on HRC MS 46

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous scholarship has argued that the manuscript (W) used by Wynkyn de Worde for his 1498 edition of the Canterbury Tales (Wn) was derived from the same line of descent as Gg (Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27) and Ph1 (The University of Texas, The Harry Ransom Center MS 46). Most recently, Stephen Partridge, examining the glosses of Wn, has proposed a theory that two types of glossed text, an El-Ll2 type and a Gg-Ph1-Wn type, were derived from a common lost source, and that a further stage of copying of a Gg-Ph1-Wn type led to Gg and Ph1 with glosses largely omitted and Wn with glosses. My extensive textual analyses of Wn have advanced this theory, and show that Wn/W is textually closer to Ph1 than Gg and retains more archetypal readings than these two manuscripts. These findings strengthen the possibility that a copying of W led to the production of Gg and Ph1, or a manuscript behind them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-54
Number of pages25
JournalChaucer Review
Volume50
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Manuscripts
Gloss
Canterbury Tales
Copying
Descent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Wynkyn de worde's lost manuscript of the canterbury tales : With new light on HRC MS 46. / Tokunaga, Satoko.

In: Chaucer Review, Vol. 50, No. 1-2, 2015, p. 30-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{08c29590614846dc818e248708a747d6,
title = "Wynkyn de worde's lost manuscript of the canterbury tales: With new light on HRC MS 46",
abstract = "Previous scholarship has argued that the manuscript (∗W) used by Wynkyn de Worde for his 1498 edition of the Canterbury Tales (Wn) was derived from the same line of descent as Gg (Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27) and Ph1 (The University of Texas, The Harry Ransom Center MS 46). Most recently, Stephen Partridge, examining the glosses of Wn, has proposed a theory that two types of glossed text, an El-Ll2 type and a Gg-Ph1-Wn type, were derived from a common lost source, and that a further stage of copying of a Gg-Ph1-Wn type led to Gg and Ph1 with glosses largely omitted and Wn with glosses. My extensive textual analyses of Wn have advanced this theory, and show that Wn/∗W is textually closer to Ph1 than Gg and retains more archetypal readings than these two manuscripts. These findings strengthen the possibility that a copying of ∗W led to the production of Gg and Ph1, or a manuscript behind them.",
author = "Satoko Tokunaga",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "30--54",
journal = "The Chaucer Review",
issn = "0009-2002",
publisher = "Penn State University Press",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wynkyn de worde's lost manuscript of the canterbury tales

T2 - With new light on HRC MS 46

AU - Tokunaga, Satoko

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Previous scholarship has argued that the manuscript (∗W) used by Wynkyn de Worde for his 1498 edition of the Canterbury Tales (Wn) was derived from the same line of descent as Gg (Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27) and Ph1 (The University of Texas, The Harry Ransom Center MS 46). Most recently, Stephen Partridge, examining the glosses of Wn, has proposed a theory that two types of glossed text, an El-Ll2 type and a Gg-Ph1-Wn type, were derived from a common lost source, and that a further stage of copying of a Gg-Ph1-Wn type led to Gg and Ph1 with glosses largely omitted and Wn with glosses. My extensive textual analyses of Wn have advanced this theory, and show that Wn/∗W is textually closer to Ph1 than Gg and retains more archetypal readings than these two manuscripts. These findings strengthen the possibility that a copying of ∗W led to the production of Gg and Ph1, or a manuscript behind them.

AB - Previous scholarship has argued that the manuscript (∗W) used by Wynkyn de Worde for his 1498 edition of the Canterbury Tales (Wn) was derived from the same line of descent as Gg (Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27) and Ph1 (The University of Texas, The Harry Ransom Center MS 46). Most recently, Stephen Partridge, examining the glosses of Wn, has proposed a theory that two types of glossed text, an El-Ll2 type and a Gg-Ph1-Wn type, were derived from a common lost source, and that a further stage of copying of a Gg-Ph1-Wn type led to Gg and Ph1 with glosses largely omitted and Wn with glosses. My extensive textual analyses of Wn have advanced this theory, and show that Wn/∗W is textually closer to Ph1 than Gg and retains more archetypal readings than these two manuscripts. These findings strengthen the possibility that a copying of ∗W led to the production of Gg and Ph1, or a manuscript behind them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84935461757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84935461757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84935461757

VL - 50

SP - 30

EP - 54

JO - The Chaucer Review

JF - The Chaucer Review

SN - 0009-2002

IS - 1-2

ER -