TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of artificial intelligence for preoperative diagnostic and prognostic prediction in epithelial ovarian cancer based on blood biomarkers
AU - Kawakami, Eiryo
AU - Tabata, Junya
AU - Yanaihara, Nozomu
AU - Ishikawa, Tetsuo
AU - Koseki, Keita
AU - Iida, Yasushi
AU - Saito, Misato
AU - Komazaki, Hiromi
AU - Shapiro, Jason S.
AU - Goto, Chihiro
AU - Akiyama, Yuka
AU - Saito, Ryosuke
AU - Saito, Motoaki
AU - Takano, Hirokuni
AU - Yamada, Kyosuke
AU - Okamoto, Aikou
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI grant number (16K11159 to N. Yanaihara, 16KT0196 to E. Kawakami); and SECOM Science and Technology Foundation (to E. Kawakami).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Purpose: We aimed to develop an ovarian cancer–specific predictive framework for clinical stage, histotype, residual tumor burden, and prognosis using machine learning methods based on multiple biomarkers. Experimental Design: Overall, 334 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and 101 patients with benign ovarian tumors were randomly assigned to "training" and "test" cohorts. Seven supervised machine learning classifiers, including Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine, Random Forest (RF), Conditional RF (CRF), Na€ve Bayes, Neural Network, and Elastic Net, were used to derive diagnostic and prognostic information from 32 parameters commonly available from pretreatment peripheral blood tests and age. Results: Machine learning techniques were superior to conventional regression-based analyses in predicting multiple clinical parameters pertaining to EOC. Ensemble methods combining weak decision trees, such as GBM, RF, and CRF, showed the best performance in EOC prediction. The values for the highest accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC) for segregating EOC from benign ovarian tumors with RF were 92.4% and 0.968, respectively. The highest accuracy and AUC for predicting clinical stages with RF were 69.0% and 0.760, respectively. High-grade serous and mucinous histotypes of EOC could be preoperatively predicted with RF. An ordinal RF classifier could distinguish complete resection from others. Unsupervised clustering analysis identified subgroups among early-stage EOC patients with significantly worse survival. Conclusions: Machine learning systems can provide critical diagnostic and prognostic prediction for patients with EOC before initial intervention, and the use of predictive algorithms may facilitate personalized treatment options through pretreatment stratification of patients.
AB - Purpose: We aimed to develop an ovarian cancer–specific predictive framework for clinical stage, histotype, residual tumor burden, and prognosis using machine learning methods based on multiple biomarkers. Experimental Design: Overall, 334 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and 101 patients with benign ovarian tumors were randomly assigned to "training" and "test" cohorts. Seven supervised machine learning classifiers, including Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine, Random Forest (RF), Conditional RF (CRF), Na€ve Bayes, Neural Network, and Elastic Net, were used to derive diagnostic and prognostic information from 32 parameters commonly available from pretreatment peripheral blood tests and age. Results: Machine learning techniques were superior to conventional regression-based analyses in predicting multiple clinical parameters pertaining to EOC. Ensemble methods combining weak decision trees, such as GBM, RF, and CRF, showed the best performance in EOC prediction. The values for the highest accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC) for segregating EOC from benign ovarian tumors with RF were 92.4% and 0.968, respectively. The highest accuracy and AUC for predicting clinical stages with RF were 69.0% and 0.760, respectively. High-grade serous and mucinous histotypes of EOC could be preoperatively predicted with RF. An ordinal RF classifier could distinguish complete resection from others. Unsupervised clustering analysis identified subgroups among early-stage EOC patients with significantly worse survival. Conclusions: Machine learning systems can provide critical diagnostic and prognostic prediction for patients with EOC before initial intervention, and the use of predictive algorithms may facilitate personalized treatment options through pretreatment stratification of patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065780499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065780499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3378
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3378
M3 - Article
C2 - 30979733
AN - SCOPUS:85065780499
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 25
SP - 3006
EP - 3015
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 10
ER -