TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement
AU - Tsutsumi, Akizumi
AU - Iwata, Noboru
AU - Watanabe, Naotaka
AU - De Jonge, Jan
AU - Pikhart, Hynek
AU - Fernández-López, Juan Antonio
AU - Xu, Liying
AU - Peter, Richard
AU - Knutsson, Anders
AU - Niedhammer, Isabelle
AU - Kawakami, Norito
AU - Siegrist, Johannes
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Our objective was to examine cross-cultural comparability of standard scales of the Effort-Reward Imbalance occupational stress scales by item response theory (IRT) analyses. Data were from 20,256 Japanese employees, 1464 Dutch nurses and nurses' aides, 2128 representative employees from post-communist countries, 963 Swedish representative employees, 421 Chinese female employees, 10,175 employees of the French national gas and electric company and 734 Spanish railroad employees, sanitary personnel and telephone operators. The IRT likelihood ratio model was used for differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) analyses. Despite the existence of DIF, most comparisons did not show discernible differences in the relations between Effort-Reward total score and level of the underlying trait across cultural groups. In the case that DTF was suspected, excluding an item with significant DIF improved the comparability. The full cross-cultural comparability of Effort-Reward Imbalance scores can be achieved with the help of IRT analysis.
AB - Our objective was to examine cross-cultural comparability of standard scales of the Effort-Reward Imbalance occupational stress scales by item response theory (IRT) analyses. Data were from 20,256 Japanese employees, 1464 Dutch nurses and nurses' aides, 2128 representative employees from post-communist countries, 963 Swedish representative employees, 421 Chinese female employees, 10,175 employees of the French national gas and electric company and 734 Spanish railroad employees, sanitary personnel and telephone operators. The IRT likelihood ratio model was used for differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) analyses. Despite the existence of DIF, most comparisons did not show discernible differences in the relations between Effort-Reward total score and level of the underlying trait across cultural groups. In the case that DTF was suspected, excluding an item with significant DIF improved the comparability. The full cross-cultural comparability of Effort-Reward Imbalance scores can be achieved with the help of IRT analysis.
KW - Cross-cultural comparison
KW - Differential item functioning
KW - Differential test functioning
KW - Item response theory
KW - Stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64749088612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64749088612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mpr.277
DO - 10.1002/mpr.277
M3 - Article
C2 - 19194857
AN - SCOPUS:64749088612
SN - 1049-8931
VL - 18
SP - 58
EP - 67
JO - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
JF - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
IS - 1
ER -