Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision

Gerriet Janssen, Valerie Meier, Jonathan Trace

研究成果: Article査読

18 被引用数 (Scopus)


Because rubrics are the foundation of a rater's scoring process, principled rubric use requires systematic review as rubrics are adopted and adapted (Crusan, 2010, p. 72) into different local contexts. However, detailed accounts of rubric adaptations are somewhat rare. This article presents a mixed-methods (Brown, 2015) study assessing the functioning of a well-known rubric (Jacobs, Zinkgraf, Wormuth, Hartfiel, & Hugley 1981, p. 30) according to both Rasch measurement and profile analysis (n = 524), which were respectively used to analyze the scale structure and then to describe how well the rubric was classifying examinees. Upon finding that there were concerns about a lack of distinction within the rubric's scale structure, the authors decided to adapt this rubric according to theoretical and empirical criteria. The resulting scale structure was then piloted by two program outsiders and analyzed again according to Rasch measurement, placement being measured by profile analysis (n = 80). While the revised rubric can continue to be fine-tuned, this study describes how one research team developed an ongoing rubric analysis, something that these authors recommend be developed more regularly in other contexts that use high-stakes performance assessment.

ジャーナルAssessing Writing
出版ステータスPublished - 2015 10 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 言語および言語学
  • 教育
  • 言語学および言語


「Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。