Clashing strategic cultures and climate policy

Megan Ceronsky, Cameron Hepburn, Michael Obersteiner, Yoshiki Yamagata

研究成果: Article査読

3 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Kagan (2002) argues that the different responses of Europeans and Americans to major strategic and international challenges is not simply due to differences in the current administrations, but rather results from (i) a power gap and (ii) differing ideologies. This article applies Kagan's theory to climate policy, employing terrorism policy as a point of comparison. We argue that the power gap between Europe and America is unable to explain the differences in climate policy. In contrast, the ideology gap may indeed have some explanatory value. Furthermore, we argue that one additional feature is critical—the costs and benefits imposed by climate change and terrorism prevention, and the process by which such costs and benefits are evaluated, differ between America and Europe.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)347-357
ページ数11
ジャーナルClimate Policy
4
4
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2004
外部発表はい

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 地球変動および惑星変動
  • 環境科学(その他)
  • 大気科学
  • 管理、モニタリング、政策と法律

フィンガープリント

「Clashing strategic cultures and climate policy」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル