TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical impact of intraoperative bile leakage during laparoscopic liver resection
AU - Hayashi, Koki
AU - Abe, Yuta
AU - Shinoda, Masahiro
AU - Kitago, Minoru
AU - Yagi, Hiroshi
AU - Oshima, Go
AU - Hori, Shutaro
AU - Wakabayashi, Taiga
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Funding Information:
Yuko Kitagawa reports grants and personal fees from AsahiKASEI Co., Ltd. and grants from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited; Merck Serono Co., Ltd.; EA Pharma Co., Ltd.; Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory Inc.; Shionogi & Co., Ltd.; Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Astellas Pharma Inc.; Medicon Inc.; Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd.; Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Kyouwa Hakkou Kirin Co., Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Japan Blood Products Organization; Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd.; Sanofi K.K.; Eisai Co., Ltd.; Tsumura & Co.; KCI Licensing, Inc.; Abbott Japan Co., Ltd.; and Fujifilm Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. Masahiro Shinoda reports grants from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Novartis Pharma Co., Ltd.; Eisai Co., Ltd.; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited; Shionogi & Co., Ltd.; AsahiKASEI Co., Ltd.; and Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. Acknowledgements
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Background: Despite the increasing number of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) procedures, postoperative bile leakage (POBL) remains a major complication. We occasionally experienced intraoperative bile leakage (IOBL) during LLR and managed it within the restrictions of laparoscopic surgery. However, there have been no reports about IOBL in LLR. We therefore investigated the impact of IOBL on postoperative outcomes and its predictive factors. Methods: We reviewed 137 patients who underwent LLR from April 2016 to March 2019 at our institute and assigned them to IOBL-positive or IOBL-negative groups. We compared clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes. Patients were further divided into four groups according to IOBL pattern, and the frequency of POBL in each was calculated. Predictors of IOBL were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: There were 30 and 107 patients in the IOBL-positive and IOBL-negative groups, respectively. In the IOBL-positive group, operative time and postoperative hospital stays were significantly longer (P < 0.001). The frequency of POBL was significantly higher in the IOBL-positive group (P = 0.006). The IOBL-positive group was divided into two subgroups: IOBL from the transected parenchyma (IOBL-TP, n = 18) and from the main Glissonean pedicle (IOBL-mGP, n = 12). The IOBL-negative group was divided into two subgroups: bile staining in the mGP (BS-mGP, n = 9) and no change (NC, n = 98). POBL occurred in 11% (n = 2/18) of patients with IOBL-TP, 25% (n = 3/12) of those with IOBL-mGP, 11% (n = 1/9) of those with BS-mGP, and 1% (n = 1/98) of those with NC. Age, diabetes mellitus, indocyanine green retention rate, and Glissonean approach were predictors of IOBL (P < 0.05). Conclusions: IOBL was relatively common during LLR and resulted in a higher incidence of POBL. Depending on the predictive factors, IOBL must be promptly identified and appropriately managed.
AB - Background: Despite the increasing number of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) procedures, postoperative bile leakage (POBL) remains a major complication. We occasionally experienced intraoperative bile leakage (IOBL) during LLR and managed it within the restrictions of laparoscopic surgery. However, there have been no reports about IOBL in LLR. We therefore investigated the impact of IOBL on postoperative outcomes and its predictive factors. Methods: We reviewed 137 patients who underwent LLR from April 2016 to March 2019 at our institute and assigned them to IOBL-positive or IOBL-negative groups. We compared clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes. Patients were further divided into four groups according to IOBL pattern, and the frequency of POBL in each was calculated. Predictors of IOBL were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: There were 30 and 107 patients in the IOBL-positive and IOBL-negative groups, respectively. In the IOBL-positive group, operative time and postoperative hospital stays were significantly longer (P < 0.001). The frequency of POBL was significantly higher in the IOBL-positive group (P = 0.006). The IOBL-positive group was divided into two subgroups: IOBL from the transected parenchyma (IOBL-TP, n = 18) and from the main Glissonean pedicle (IOBL-mGP, n = 12). The IOBL-negative group was divided into two subgroups: bile staining in the mGP (BS-mGP, n = 9) and no change (NC, n = 98). POBL occurred in 11% (n = 2/18) of patients with IOBL-TP, 25% (n = 3/12) of those with IOBL-mGP, 11% (n = 1/9) of those with BS-mGP, and 1% (n = 1/98) of those with NC. Age, diabetes mellitus, indocyanine green retention rate, and Glissonean approach were predictors of IOBL (P < 0.05). Conclusions: IOBL was relatively common during LLR and resulted in a higher incidence of POBL. Depending on the predictive factors, IOBL must be promptly identified and appropriately managed.
KW - Bile leakage
KW - Glissonean approach
KW - Indocyanine green retention rate
KW - Laparoscopic liver resection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089297608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089297608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-020-07880-2
DO - 10.1007/s00464-020-07880-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 32780232
AN - SCOPUS:85089297608
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 35
SP - 4134
EP - 4142
JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
IS - 8
ER -