Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer

Makoto Hikage, Masanori Tokunaga, Rie Makuuchi, Tomoyuki Irino, Yutaka Tanizawa, Etsuro Bando, Taiichi Kawamura, Masanori Terashima

研究成果: Article

5 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

Background: Increasing numbers of patients are treated by robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG); however, it remains unclear whether RDG is clinically comparable with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study aimed to clarify the feasibility of RDG from safety aspects. Methods: The study included 109 cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent RDG at Shizuoka Cancer Center from January 2012 to April 2015. Short-term outcomes were compared with 160 cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent LDG during the same period. Results: Patient characteristics were well matched. The RDG patients experienced longer operative times (323 min) than LDG patients (285 min; P < 0.001), although all other surgical outcomes were comparable between the groups. Drain amylase levels on POD 1 were significantly lower in the RDG group compared to LDG cases (median 452 U/L and 892 U/L; P < 0.001). The incidence of all complications was similar across the study patients, although intra-abdominal infectious complications tended to be lower in the RDG group than in the LDG group (2.8 and 8.1%; P = 0.112). Conclusions: RDG was comparable to LDG in terms of feasibility for cT1 gastric cancer. RDG has the potential to reduce pancreas damage and thus to decrease intra-abdominal infectious complications.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)1803-1810
ページ数8
ジャーナルWorld Journal of Surgery
42
発行部数6
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2018 6 1
外部発表Yes

Fingerprint

Robotics
Gastrectomy
Stomach Neoplasms
Amylases
Operative Time
Pancreas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

これを引用

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer. / Hikage, Makoto; Tokunaga, Masanori; Makuuchi, Rie; Irino, Tomoyuki; Tanizawa, Yutaka; Bando, Etsuro; Kawamura, Taiichi; Terashima, Masanori.

:: World Journal of Surgery, 巻 42, 番号 6, 01.06.2018, p. 1803-1810.

研究成果: Article

Hikage, M, Tokunaga, M, Makuuchi, R, Irino, T, Tanizawa, Y, Bando, E, Kawamura, T & Terashima, M 2018, 'Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer', World Journal of Surgery, 巻. 42, 番号 6, pp. 1803-1810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4345-4
Hikage, Makoto ; Tokunaga, Masanori ; Makuuchi, Rie ; Irino, Tomoyuki ; Tanizawa, Yutaka ; Bando, Etsuro ; Kawamura, Taiichi ; Terashima, Masanori. / Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer. :: World Journal of Surgery. 2018 ; 巻 42, 番号 6. pp. 1803-1810.
@article{4bcc1e2a73974c7a8e6675c8f4a9617f,
title = "Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer",
abstract = "Background: Increasing numbers of patients are treated by robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG); however, it remains unclear whether RDG is clinically comparable with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study aimed to clarify the feasibility of RDG from safety aspects. Methods: The study included 109 cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent RDG at Shizuoka Cancer Center from January 2012 to April 2015. Short-term outcomes were compared with 160 cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent LDG during the same period. Results: Patient characteristics were well matched. The RDG patients experienced longer operative times (323 min) than LDG patients (285 min; P < 0.001), although all other surgical outcomes were comparable between the groups. Drain amylase levels on POD 1 were significantly lower in the RDG group compared to LDG cases (median 452 U/L and 892 U/L; P < 0.001). The incidence of all complications was similar across the study patients, although intra-abdominal infectious complications tended to be lower in the RDG group than in the LDG group (2.8 and 8.1{\%}; P = 0.112). Conclusions: RDG was comparable to LDG in terms of feasibility for cT1 gastric cancer. RDG has the potential to reduce pancreas damage and thus to decrease intra-abdominal infectious complications.",
author = "Makoto Hikage and Masanori Tokunaga and Rie Makuuchi and Tomoyuki Irino and Yutaka Tanizawa and Etsuro Bando and Taiichi Kawamura and Masanori Terashima",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-017-4345-4",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1803--1810",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer

AU - Hikage, Makoto

AU - Tokunaga, Masanori

AU - Makuuchi, Rie

AU - Irino, Tomoyuki

AU - Tanizawa, Yutaka

AU - Bando, Etsuro

AU - Kawamura, Taiichi

AU - Terashima, Masanori

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Background: Increasing numbers of patients are treated by robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG); however, it remains unclear whether RDG is clinically comparable with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study aimed to clarify the feasibility of RDG from safety aspects. Methods: The study included 109 cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent RDG at Shizuoka Cancer Center from January 2012 to April 2015. Short-term outcomes were compared with 160 cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent LDG during the same period. Results: Patient characteristics were well matched. The RDG patients experienced longer operative times (323 min) than LDG patients (285 min; P < 0.001), although all other surgical outcomes were comparable between the groups. Drain amylase levels on POD 1 were significantly lower in the RDG group compared to LDG cases (median 452 U/L and 892 U/L; P < 0.001). The incidence of all complications was similar across the study patients, although intra-abdominal infectious complications tended to be lower in the RDG group than in the LDG group (2.8 and 8.1%; P = 0.112). Conclusions: RDG was comparable to LDG in terms of feasibility for cT1 gastric cancer. RDG has the potential to reduce pancreas damage and thus to decrease intra-abdominal infectious complications.

AB - Background: Increasing numbers of patients are treated by robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG); however, it remains unclear whether RDG is clinically comparable with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study aimed to clarify the feasibility of RDG from safety aspects. Methods: The study included 109 cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent RDG at Shizuoka Cancer Center from January 2012 to April 2015. Short-term outcomes were compared with 160 cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent LDG during the same period. Results: Patient characteristics were well matched. The RDG patients experienced longer operative times (323 min) than LDG patients (285 min; P < 0.001), although all other surgical outcomes were comparable between the groups. Drain amylase levels on POD 1 were significantly lower in the RDG group compared to LDG cases (median 452 U/L and 892 U/L; P < 0.001). The incidence of all complications was similar across the study patients, although intra-abdominal infectious complications tended to be lower in the RDG group than in the LDG group (2.8 and 8.1%; P = 0.112). Conclusions: RDG was comparable to LDG in terms of feasibility for cT1 gastric cancer. RDG has the potential to reduce pancreas damage and thus to decrease intra-abdominal infectious complications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033585091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033585091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-017-4345-4

DO - 10.1007/s00268-017-4345-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 29134310

AN - SCOPUS:85033585091

VL - 42

SP - 1803

EP - 1810

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 6

ER -