TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations for cataract surgery in eyes after phototherapeutic keratectomy
AU - Yaguchi, Yukari
AU - Negishi, Kazuno
AU - Saiki, Megumi
AU - Torii, Hidemasa
AU - Tsubota, Kazuo
PY - 2016/6/8
Y1 - 2016/6/8
N2 - Purpose: To compare the accuracy of several methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations used for cataract surgery in eyes treated with phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) that results in changes in the anterior corneal surface and axial length; these results make power calculations less predictable. Methods: We evaluated the medical records of 23 eyes of 13 patients (mean age, 68.8 years; range 62–80 years) who underwent cataract surgery after PTK at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. The prediction error, defined as the difference between the estimated postoperative spherical equivalent and the postoperative manifest refraction at the spectacle plane, was calculated using five formulas: SRK/T, Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, Camellin–Calossi, and OKULIX ray tracing software. We compared the median values of the arithmetic and absolute prediction errors among the five formulas. Results: The median arithmetic errors after cataract surgery for the five formulas were 0.70 D (diopter) (range −0.41 to 2.78), −0.96 D (range −2.14 to 0.81), −0.81 D (range −1.89 to 1.15), −0.04 D (range −1.35 to 1.47), and 0.68 D (range −0.61 to 2.50), respectively. Conclusion: The Camellin–Calossi formula is a good option for calculating IOL powers in eyes that underwent PTK.
AB - Purpose: To compare the accuracy of several methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations used for cataract surgery in eyes treated with phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) that results in changes in the anterior corneal surface and axial length; these results make power calculations less predictable. Methods: We evaluated the medical records of 23 eyes of 13 patients (mean age, 68.8 years; range 62–80 years) who underwent cataract surgery after PTK at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. The prediction error, defined as the difference between the estimated postoperative spherical equivalent and the postoperative manifest refraction at the spectacle plane, was calculated using five formulas: SRK/T, Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, Camellin–Calossi, and OKULIX ray tracing software. We compared the median values of the arithmetic and absolute prediction errors among the five formulas. Results: The median arithmetic errors after cataract surgery for the five formulas were 0.70 D (diopter) (range −0.41 to 2.78), −0.96 D (range −2.14 to 0.81), −0.81 D (range −1.89 to 1.15), −0.04 D (range −1.35 to 1.47), and 0.68 D (range −0.61 to 2.50), respectively. Conclusion: The Camellin–Calossi formula is a good option for calculating IOL powers in eyes that underwent PTK.
KW - Band keratopathy
KW - Camellin–Calossi formula
KW - Granular corneal dystrophy type 2
KW - Intraocular lens power calculation
KW - Phototherapeutic keratectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976254182&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976254182&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10384-016-0452-2
DO - 10.1007/s10384-016-0452-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 27277426
AN - SCOPUS:84976254182
SN - 0021-5155
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
ER -