TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the after-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex in patients with stroke and healthy volunteers
AU - Suzuki, Kanjiro
AU - Fujiwara, Toshiyuki
AU - Tanaka, Naofumi
AU - Tsuji, Tetsuya
AU - Masakado, Yoshihisa
AU - Hase, Kimitaka
AU - Kimura, Akio
AU - Liu, Meigen
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank John C. Rothwell for constructive comments on the manuscript. This study was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (23500619) and the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences (SRPBS) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the result of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated. Address correspondence to Dr Kanjiro Suzuki, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomati, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582 Japan. E-mail: kanjiro6@eco.ocn.ne.jp
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - It is known that weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces persistent excitability changes in the cerebral cortex. There are, however, few studies that compare the after-effects of anodal versus cathodal tDCS in patients with stroke. This study assessed the after-effects of tDCS over the motor cortex in patients with hemiparetic stroke and healthy volunteers. Seven stroke patients and nine healthy volunteers were recruited. Ten minutes of anodal and cathodal tDCS (1 mA) and sham stimulation were applied to the affected primary motor cortex (M1) on different days. In healthy subjects, tDCS was applied to the right M1. Before and after tDCS, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle and silent period were measured. Anodal tDCS increased the MEPs of the affected FDI in patients with stroke as well as in healthy subjects. Cathodal tDCS increased the MEPs of the affected FDI in patients with stroke. In healthy subjects, however, cathodal tDCS decreased the MEPs. We found no significant change in the duration of the silent period after anodal or cathodal tDCS. We found that both anodal and cathodal tDCS increased the affected M1 excitability in patients with stroke. It is thought that the after-effects of tDCS are different in patients with stroke compared with healthy subjects.
AB - It is known that weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces persistent excitability changes in the cerebral cortex. There are, however, few studies that compare the after-effects of anodal versus cathodal tDCS in patients with stroke. This study assessed the after-effects of tDCS over the motor cortex in patients with hemiparetic stroke and healthy volunteers. Seven stroke patients and nine healthy volunteers were recruited. Ten minutes of anodal and cathodal tDCS (1 mA) and sham stimulation were applied to the affected primary motor cortex (M1) on different days. In healthy subjects, tDCS was applied to the right M1. Before and after tDCS, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle and silent period were measured. Anodal tDCS increased the MEPs of the affected FDI in patients with stroke as well as in healthy subjects. Cathodal tDCS increased the MEPs of the affected FDI in patients with stroke. In healthy subjects, however, cathodal tDCS decreased the MEPs. We found no significant change in the duration of the silent period after anodal or cathodal tDCS. We found that both anodal and cathodal tDCS increased the affected M1 excitability in patients with stroke. It is thought that the after-effects of tDCS are different in patients with stroke compared with healthy subjects.
KW - Cerebrovascular disease
KW - Cortical plasticity
KW - Hemiparesis
KW - Motor-evoked potential (MEP)
KW - Trancranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
KW - Trancranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867526363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867526363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/00207454.2012.707715
DO - 10.3109/00207454.2012.707715
M3 - Article
C2 - 22747238
AN - SCOPUS:84867526363
SN - 0020-7454
VL - 122
SP - 675
EP - 681
JO - International Journal of Neuroscience
JF - International Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 11
ER -