Comparison of the reliability and validity of outcome instruments for cutaneous dermatomyositis

R. Q. Klein, C. A. Bangert, M. Costner, M. K. Connolly, A. Tanikawa, J. Okawa, M. Rose, S. S. Fakharzadeh, D. Fiorentino, L. A. Lee, R. D. Sontheimer, L. Taylor, A. B. Troxel, V. P. Werth

研究成果: Article査読

68 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Background: Reliable and validated measures of skin disease severity are needed for cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM). Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), Dermatomyositis Skin Severity Index (DSSI) and Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) skin indices have been developed as outcome instruments. Objectives: We sought to demonstrate reliability and validity of the CDASI, and to compare the CDASI with other potential tools for use in measuring disease severity in cutaneous dermatomyositis. Patients and methods: CDASI has four activity and two damage measures, with scores from 0 to 148. DSSI assesses activity based on body surface area and severity on a scale of 0-72. CAT uses 21 activity and damage items, for a range of 0-175 for activity and 0-33 for damage. Ten dermatologists used the instruments to score the same 12-16 patients in one session. Global validation measures were administered to physicians and patients. Results: Global validation measures correlated with the three outcome instruments (P < 0.0001). CAT displayed lower inter- and intrarater reliability relative to the CDASI. All scales correlate better with physician than patient global skin measures. Conclusions: It appears that the CDASI may be a useful outcome measure for studies of cutaneous DM. Further testing to compare responsiveness of all three measures is necessary.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)887-894
ページ数8
ジャーナルBritish Journal of Dermatology
159
4
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2008 10

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 皮膚病学

フィンガープリント

「Comparison of the reliability and validity of outcome instruments for cutaneous dermatomyositis」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル