TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a new measure to assess trunk impairment after stroke (Trunk Impairment Scale)
T2 - Its psychometric properties
AU - Fujiwara, Toshiyuki
AU - Liu, Meigen
AU - Tsuji, Tetsuya
AU - Sonoda, Shigeru
AU - Mizuno, Katsuhiro
AU - Akaboshi, Kazuto
AU - Hase, Kimitaka
AU - Masakado, Yoshihisa
AU - Chino, Naoichi
PY - 2004/9/1
Y1 - 2004/9/1
N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate reliability, validity, internal structure, and responsiveness of our newly developed Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) for patients with stroke. Design: A total of 73 patients with stroke participated in this prospective study. Interrater reliability (weighted kappa statistics), content validity (principal component analysis), concurrent validity (Spearman's rank correlation with the Trunk Control Test), predictive validity (prediction of discharge FIM™ scores), and responsiveness (standardized response mean values) were examined. Internal consistency and item difficulties were analyzed with Rasch analysis. Results: The weighted kappa of each TIS item ranged from 0.66 to 1.0. Principal component analysis revealed that the TIS measured a domain similar to the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set trunk items but different from the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set motor and visuospatial items. The TIS correlated with the Trunk Control Test (r = 0.91). To predict discharge FIM motor scores, addition of the TIS as one of the predictors to age, time from onset, and admission FIM score increased the adjusted R2 from 0.66 to 0.75. With Rasch analysis, the misfit was acceptable, except for the abdominal muscle strength item. The difficulty patterns were similar at admission and discharge, except for the abdominal muscle strength item. The responsiveness of the TIS was satisfactory and comparable with that of the Trunk Control Test (standardized response mean values, 0.94 and 1.06). Conclusions: Our newly developed TIS is reliable, valid, and responsive for use in stroke outcome research.
AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate reliability, validity, internal structure, and responsiveness of our newly developed Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) for patients with stroke. Design: A total of 73 patients with stroke participated in this prospective study. Interrater reliability (weighted kappa statistics), content validity (principal component analysis), concurrent validity (Spearman's rank correlation with the Trunk Control Test), predictive validity (prediction of discharge FIM™ scores), and responsiveness (standardized response mean values) were examined. Internal consistency and item difficulties were analyzed with Rasch analysis. Results: The weighted kappa of each TIS item ranged from 0.66 to 1.0. Principal component analysis revealed that the TIS measured a domain similar to the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set trunk items but different from the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set motor and visuospatial items. The TIS correlated with the Trunk Control Test (r = 0.91). To predict discharge FIM motor scores, addition of the TIS as one of the predictors to age, time from onset, and admission FIM score increased the adjusted R2 from 0.66 to 0.75. With Rasch analysis, the misfit was acceptable, except for the abdominal muscle strength item. The difficulty patterns were similar at admission and discharge, except for the abdominal muscle strength item. The responsiveness of the TIS was satisfactory and comparable with that of the Trunk Control Test (standardized response mean values, 0.94 and 1.06). Conclusions: Our newly developed TIS is reliable, valid, and responsive for use in stroke outcome research.
KW - Cerebrovascular Disorders
KW - Functional Instrument
KW - Hemiplegia
KW - Rasch Analysis
KW - Rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143116897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143116897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.PHM.0000137308.10562.20
DO - 10.1097/01.PHM.0000137308.10562.20
M3 - Article
C2 - 15314532
AN - SCOPUS:4143116897
SN - 0894-9115
VL - 83
SP - 681
EP - 688
JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine
JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine
IS - 9
ER -