Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography for Detection of a Fistula on the Birth Day in Neonates with an Imperforate Anus: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Suprapubic and Perineal Approaches

Takahiro Hosokawa, Yoshitake Yamada, Yutaka Tanami, Shinya Hattori, Yumiko Sato, Yujiro Tanaka, Hiroshi Kawashima, Mayumi Hosokawa, Eiji Oguma

研究成果: Article

4 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonography for detection of an internal fistula on the birth day in neonates with an imperforate anus and to compare the diagnostic performance between the suprapubic and perineal approaches. Methods: We included 46 neonates with an imperforate anus (29 low type and 17 intermediate/high type) who underwent sonography by both the suprapubic and perineal approaches on the birth day. Thirty-nine neonates had internal fistulas, and 12 did not, as surgically proven. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the suprapubic and perineal sonograms for the presence of the internal fistula in consensus. A final diagnosis of the internal fistula was determined on the basis of the findings of both approaches. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance for detection of an internal fistula between the suprapubic and perineal approaches. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the final diagnosis based on the findings of suprapubic, perineal, and both approaches were 52.9%, 79.4%, and 79.4%; 75.5%, 75.5%, and 75.5%; and 58.7%, 78.3%, and 78.3%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the perineal approach was significantly better than that of the suprapubic approach (P <.0001). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of sonography for detection of an internal fistula on the birth day exceeded 75% in neonates with an imperforate anus, and sonography on the birth day is feasible. The perineal approach had superior diagnostic performance over the suprapubic approach. Thus, when evaluating an internal fistula by sonography, we recommend using the perineal approach in addition to the suprapubic approach.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)1989-1995
ページ数7
ジャーナルJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
36
発行部数10
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2017 10 1

Fingerprint

Imperforate Anus
Fistula
Ultrasonography
Parturition
Newborn Infant
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

これを引用

Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography for Detection of a Fistula on the Birth Day in Neonates with an Imperforate Anus : Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Suprapubic and Perineal Approaches. / Hosokawa, Takahiro; Yamada, Yoshitake; Tanami, Yutaka; Hattori, Shinya; Sato, Yumiko; Tanaka, Yujiro; Kawashima, Hiroshi; Hosokawa, Mayumi; Oguma, Eiji.

:: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 巻 36, 番号 10, 01.10.2017, p. 1989-1995.

研究成果: Article

Hosokawa, Takahiro ; Yamada, Yoshitake ; Tanami, Yutaka ; Hattori, Shinya ; Sato, Yumiko ; Tanaka, Yujiro ; Kawashima, Hiroshi ; Hosokawa, Mayumi ; Oguma, Eiji. / Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography for Detection of a Fistula on the Birth Day in Neonates with an Imperforate Anus : Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Suprapubic and Perineal Approaches. :: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2017 ; 巻 36, 番号 10. pp. 1989-1995.
@article{a75f3e01bfb34673b4c2b215616403c0,
title = "Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography for Detection of a Fistula on the Birth Day in Neonates with an Imperforate Anus: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Suprapubic and Perineal Approaches",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonography for detection of an internal fistula on the birth day in neonates with an imperforate anus and to compare the diagnostic performance between the suprapubic and perineal approaches. Methods: We included 46 neonates with an imperforate anus (29 low type and 17 intermediate/high type) who underwent sonography by both the suprapubic and perineal approaches on the birth day. Thirty-nine neonates had internal fistulas, and 12 did not, as surgically proven. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the suprapubic and perineal sonograms for the presence of the internal fistula in consensus. A final diagnosis of the internal fistula was determined on the basis of the findings of both approaches. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance for detection of an internal fistula between the suprapubic and perineal approaches. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the final diagnosis based on the findings of suprapubic, perineal, and both approaches were 52.9{\%}, 79.4{\%}, and 79.4{\%}; 75.5{\%}, 75.5{\%}, and 75.5{\%}; and 58.7{\%}, 78.3{\%}, and 78.3{\%}, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the perineal approach was significantly better than that of the suprapubic approach (P <.0001). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of sonography for detection of an internal fistula on the birth day exceeded 75{\%} in neonates with an imperforate anus, and sonography on the birth day is feasible. The perineal approach had superior diagnostic performance over the suprapubic approach. Thus, when evaluating an internal fistula by sonography, we recommend using the perineal approach in addition to the suprapubic approach.",
keywords = "anorectal malformation, imperforate anus, internal fistula, neonate, pediatric ultrasound, sonography",
author = "Takahiro Hosokawa and Yoshitake Yamada and Yutaka Tanami and Shinya Hattori and Yumiko Sato and Yujiro Tanaka and Hiroshi Kawashima and Mayumi Hosokawa and Eiji Oguma",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jum.14227",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1989--1995",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography for Detection of a Fistula on the Birth Day in Neonates with an Imperforate Anus

T2 - Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Suprapubic and Perineal Approaches

AU - Hosokawa, Takahiro

AU - Yamada, Yoshitake

AU - Tanami, Yutaka

AU - Hattori, Shinya

AU - Sato, Yumiko

AU - Tanaka, Yujiro

AU - Kawashima, Hiroshi

AU - Hosokawa, Mayumi

AU - Oguma, Eiji

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonography for detection of an internal fistula on the birth day in neonates with an imperforate anus and to compare the diagnostic performance between the suprapubic and perineal approaches. Methods: We included 46 neonates with an imperforate anus (29 low type and 17 intermediate/high type) who underwent sonography by both the suprapubic and perineal approaches on the birth day. Thirty-nine neonates had internal fistulas, and 12 did not, as surgically proven. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the suprapubic and perineal sonograms for the presence of the internal fistula in consensus. A final diagnosis of the internal fistula was determined on the basis of the findings of both approaches. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance for detection of an internal fistula between the suprapubic and perineal approaches. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the final diagnosis based on the findings of suprapubic, perineal, and both approaches were 52.9%, 79.4%, and 79.4%; 75.5%, 75.5%, and 75.5%; and 58.7%, 78.3%, and 78.3%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the perineal approach was significantly better than that of the suprapubic approach (P <.0001). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of sonography for detection of an internal fistula on the birth day exceeded 75% in neonates with an imperforate anus, and sonography on the birth day is feasible. The perineal approach had superior diagnostic performance over the suprapubic approach. Thus, when evaluating an internal fistula by sonography, we recommend using the perineal approach in addition to the suprapubic approach.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonography for detection of an internal fistula on the birth day in neonates with an imperforate anus and to compare the diagnostic performance between the suprapubic and perineal approaches. Methods: We included 46 neonates with an imperforate anus (29 low type and 17 intermediate/high type) who underwent sonography by both the suprapubic and perineal approaches on the birth day. Thirty-nine neonates had internal fistulas, and 12 did not, as surgically proven. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the suprapubic and perineal sonograms for the presence of the internal fistula in consensus. A final diagnosis of the internal fistula was determined on the basis of the findings of both approaches. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance for detection of an internal fistula between the suprapubic and perineal approaches. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the final diagnosis based on the findings of suprapubic, perineal, and both approaches were 52.9%, 79.4%, and 79.4%; 75.5%, 75.5%, and 75.5%; and 58.7%, 78.3%, and 78.3%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the perineal approach was significantly better than that of the suprapubic approach (P <.0001). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of sonography for detection of an internal fistula on the birth day exceeded 75% in neonates with an imperforate anus, and sonography on the birth day is feasible. The perineal approach had superior diagnostic performance over the suprapubic approach. Thus, when evaluating an internal fistula by sonography, we recommend using the perineal approach in addition to the suprapubic approach.

KW - anorectal malformation

KW - imperforate anus

KW - internal fistula

KW - neonate

KW - pediatric ultrasound

KW - sonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032507529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032507529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jum.14227

DO - 10.1002/jum.14227

M3 - Article

C2 - 28480562

AN - SCOPUS:85032507529

VL - 36

SP - 1989

EP - 1995

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 10

ER -