TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic multilayer routing schemes in GMPLS-based IP+optical networks
AU - Oki, Eiji
AU - Shiomoto, Kohei
AU - Shimazaki, Daisaku
AU - Yamanaka, Naoaki
AU - Imajuku, Wataru
AU - Takigawa, Yoshihiro
PY - 2005/1
Y1 - 2005/1
N2 - This article presents two dynamic multilayer routing policies implemented in the photonic MPLS router developed by NTT for IP+optical generalized MPLS networks. According to IP traffic requests, wavelength paths called lambda label switched paths are set up and released in a distributed manner based on GMPLS routing and signaling protocols. Both dynamic routing policies first try to allocate a newly requested electrical path to an existing optical path that directly connects the source and destination nodes. If such a path is not available, the two policies employ different procedures. Policy 1 tries to find available existing optical paths with two or more hops that connect the source and destination nodes. Policy 2 tries to establish a new one-hop optical path between source and destination nodes. The performances of the two routing policies are evaluated. Simulation results suggest that policy 2 outperforms policy 1 if p is large, where p is the number of packet-switching-capable ports; the reverse is true only if p is small. We observe that p is the key factor in choosing the most appropriate routing policy. We also describe items that need to be standardized in the IETF to effectively achieve multilayer traffic engineering.
AB - This article presents two dynamic multilayer routing policies implemented in the photonic MPLS router developed by NTT for IP+optical generalized MPLS networks. According to IP traffic requests, wavelength paths called lambda label switched paths are set up and released in a distributed manner based on GMPLS routing and signaling protocols. Both dynamic routing policies first try to allocate a newly requested electrical path to an existing optical path that directly connects the source and destination nodes. If such a path is not available, the two policies employ different procedures. Policy 1 tries to find available existing optical paths with two or more hops that connect the source and destination nodes. Policy 2 tries to establish a new one-hop optical path between source and destination nodes. The performances of the two routing policies are evaluated. Simulation results suggest that policy 2 outperforms policy 1 if p is large, where p is the number of packet-switching-capable ports; the reverse is true only if p is small. We observe that p is the key factor in choosing the most appropriate routing policy. We also describe items that need to be standardized in the IETF to effectively achieve multilayer traffic engineering.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13244277744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13244277744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/MCOM.2005.1381883
DO - 10.1109/MCOM.2005.1381883
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:13244277744
SN - 0163-6804
VL - 43
SP - 108
EP - 114
JO - IEEE Communications Society Magazine
JF - IEEE Communications Society Magazine
IS - 1
ER -