TY - JOUR
T1 - Measure of synonymous codon usage diversity among genes in bacteria
AU - Suzuki, Haruo
AU - Saito, Rintaro
AU - Tomita, Masaru
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/6/1
Y1 - 2009/6/1
N2 - Background: In many bacteria, intragenomic diversity in synonymous codon usage among genes has been reported. However, no quantitative attempt has been made to compare the diversity levels among different genomes. Here, we introduce a mean dissimilarity-based index (Dmean) for quantifying the level of diversity in synonymous codon usage among all genes within a genome. Results: The application of Dmean to 268 bacterial genomes shows that in bacteria with extremely biased genomic G+C compositions there is little diversity in synonymous codon usage among genes. Furthermore, our findings contradict previous reports. For example, a low level of diversity in codon usage among genes has been reported for Helicobacter pylori, but based on Dmean, the diversity level of this species is higher than those of more than half of bacteria tested here. The discrepancies between our findings and previous reports are probably due to differences in the methods used for measuring codon usage diversity. Conclusion: We recommend that Dmean be used to measure the diversity level of codon usage among genes. This measure can be applied to other compositional features such as amino acid usage and dinucleotide relative abundance as a genomic signature.
AB - Background: In many bacteria, intragenomic diversity in synonymous codon usage among genes has been reported. However, no quantitative attempt has been made to compare the diversity levels among different genomes. Here, we introduce a mean dissimilarity-based index (Dmean) for quantifying the level of diversity in synonymous codon usage among all genes within a genome. Results: The application of Dmean to 268 bacterial genomes shows that in bacteria with extremely biased genomic G+C compositions there is little diversity in synonymous codon usage among genes. Furthermore, our findings contradict previous reports. For example, a low level of diversity in codon usage among genes has been reported for Helicobacter pylori, but based on Dmean, the diversity level of this species is higher than those of more than half of bacteria tested here. The discrepancies between our findings and previous reports are probably due to differences in the methods used for measuring codon usage diversity. Conclusion: We recommend that Dmean be used to measure the diversity level of codon usage among genes. This measure can be applied to other compositional features such as amino acid usage and dinucleotide relative abundance as a genomic signature.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649083891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649083891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2105-10-167
DO - 10.1186/1471-2105-10-167
M3 - Article
C2 - 19480720
AN - SCOPUS:67649083891
VL - 10
JO - BMC Bioinformatics
JF - BMC Bioinformatics
SN - 1471-2105
M1 - 167
ER -