Point/Counterpoint: Network neutrality nuances

Barbara Van Schewick, David Farber

研究成果: Article

16 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

A comparative study in favor and against of network neutrality has been done by Barbara Van Schewick and David Farber. Barbara feels that network neutrality and its rules as Internet access means access to everything the Internet has to offer, not to access to a selection of Internet applications and content approved by the ISP. ISP have access to sophisticated technology that enables them to block applications or content one does not like, or degrade their performance by slowing the delivery of corresponding data packets. Changes in technology have given network providers an unprecedented ability to control applications and content on their network and rules will help us protect it. However, David Farber believes that the growth and expansion of Internet into all corners of society have made a major part of global life. Network providers must work together with Internet's workings to voluntarily develop better information about Internet's overall health. The capacity constraints and hurdles, and the impact of variety of applications on network capacity, and congestion problems should also be considered.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)31-37
ページ数7
ジャーナルCommunications of the ACM
52
発行部数2
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2009 2 1
外部発表Yes

Fingerprint

Internet
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)

これを引用

Point/Counterpoint : Network neutrality nuances. / Van Schewick, Barbara; Farber, David.

:: Communications of the ACM, 巻 52, 番号 2, 01.02.2009, p. 31-37.

研究成果: Article

Van Schewick, Barbara ; Farber, David. / Point/Counterpoint : Network neutrality nuances. :: Communications of the ACM. 2009 ; 巻 52, 番号 2. pp. 31-37.
@article{7223651330fc47f3aefa3603debb5a18,
title = "Point/Counterpoint: Network neutrality nuances",
abstract = "A comparative study in favor and against of network neutrality has been done by Barbara Van Schewick and David Farber. Barbara feels that network neutrality and its rules as Internet access means access to everything the Internet has to offer, not to access to a selection of Internet applications and content approved by the ISP. ISP have access to sophisticated technology that enables them to block applications or content one does not like, or degrade their performance by slowing the delivery of corresponding data packets. Changes in technology have given network providers an unprecedented ability to control applications and content on their network and rules will help us protect it. However, David Farber believes that the growth and expansion of Internet into all corners of society have made a major part of global life. Network providers must work together with Internet's workings to voluntarily develop better information about Internet's overall health. The capacity constraints and hurdles, and the impact of variety of applications on network capacity, and congestion problems should also be considered.",
author = "{Van Schewick}, Barbara and David Farber",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1145/1461928.1461942",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "31--37",
journal = "Communications of the ACM",
issn = "0001-0782",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Point/Counterpoint

T2 - Network neutrality nuances

AU - Van Schewick, Barbara

AU - Farber, David

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - A comparative study in favor and against of network neutrality has been done by Barbara Van Schewick and David Farber. Barbara feels that network neutrality and its rules as Internet access means access to everything the Internet has to offer, not to access to a selection of Internet applications and content approved by the ISP. ISP have access to sophisticated technology that enables them to block applications or content one does not like, or degrade their performance by slowing the delivery of corresponding data packets. Changes in technology have given network providers an unprecedented ability to control applications and content on their network and rules will help us protect it. However, David Farber believes that the growth and expansion of Internet into all corners of society have made a major part of global life. Network providers must work together with Internet's workings to voluntarily develop better information about Internet's overall health. The capacity constraints and hurdles, and the impact of variety of applications on network capacity, and congestion problems should also be considered.

AB - A comparative study in favor and against of network neutrality has been done by Barbara Van Schewick and David Farber. Barbara feels that network neutrality and its rules as Internet access means access to everything the Internet has to offer, not to access to a selection of Internet applications and content approved by the ISP. ISP have access to sophisticated technology that enables them to block applications or content one does not like, or degrade their performance by slowing the delivery of corresponding data packets. Changes in technology have given network providers an unprecedented ability to control applications and content on their network and rules will help us protect it. However, David Farber believes that the growth and expansion of Internet into all corners of society have made a major part of global life. Network providers must work together with Internet's workings to voluntarily develop better information about Internet's overall health. The capacity constraints and hurdles, and the impact of variety of applications on network capacity, and congestion problems should also be considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58849086840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58849086840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1461928.1461942

DO - 10.1145/1461928.1461942

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58849086840

VL - 52

SP - 31

EP - 37

JO - Communications of the ACM

JF - Communications of the ACM

SN - 0001-0782

IS - 2

ER -