TY - JOUR
T1 - Proton pump inhibitor alone vs proton pump inhibitor plus mucosal protective agents for endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Nishizawa, Toshihiro
AU - Suzuki, Hidekazu
AU - Kanai, Takanori
AU - Yahagi, Naohisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 JCBN.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Mucosal protective agents may improve healing of patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers. The present study systematically evaluated published clinical trials to determine whether combined therapeutic use of mucosal protective agents and proton pump inhibitors can improve the outcome of patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers compared to treatment with proton pump inhibitors alone. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi database were searched to identify eligible randomized trials for systematic review. We identified 11 randomized trials for inclusion in our study (1,160 patients). Pooled endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer healing rates were 45.8% and 34.4% for patients with or without mucosal protective agents, respectively. The odds ratio was 2.28 (95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.31) with no significant study heterogeneity. In conclusion, the systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the combined therapeutic use of proton pump inhibitors and mucosal protective agents improved healing rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers compared to treatment with proton pump inhibitor monotherapy.
AB - Mucosal protective agents may improve healing of patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers. The present study systematically evaluated published clinical trials to determine whether combined therapeutic use of mucosal protective agents and proton pump inhibitors can improve the outcome of patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers compared to treatment with proton pump inhibitors alone. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi database were searched to identify eligible randomized trials for systematic review. We identified 11 randomized trials for inclusion in our study (1,160 patients). Pooled endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer healing rates were 45.8% and 34.4% for patients with or without mucosal protective agents, respectively. The odds ratio was 2.28 (95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.31) with no significant study heterogeneity. In conclusion, the systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the combined therapeutic use of proton pump inhibitors and mucosal protective agents improved healing rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers compared to treatment with proton pump inhibitor monotherapy.
KW - Endoscopic submucosal dissection
KW - Mucosal protective agents
KW - Rebamipide
KW - Ulcer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924951902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924951902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3164/jcbn.14-101
DO - 10.3164/jcbn.14-101
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84924951902
SN - 0912-0009
VL - 56
SP - 85
EP - 90
JO - Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
JF - Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
IS - 2
ER -