TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized phase II trial comparing site-specific treatment based on gene expression profiling with carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with cancer of unknown primary site
AU - Hayashi, Hidetoshi
AU - Kurata, Takayasu
AU - Takiguchi, Yuichi
AU - Arai, Makoto
AU - Takeda, Koji
AU - Akiyoshi, Kohei
AU - Matsumoto, Koji
AU - Onoe, Takuma
AU - Mukai, Hirofumi
AU - Matsubara, Nobuaki
AU - Minami, Hironobu
AU - Toyoda, Masanori
AU - Onozawa, Yusuke
AU - Ono, Akira
AU - Fujita, Yoshihiko
AU - Sakai, Kazuko
AU - Koh, Yasuhiro
AU - Takeuchi, Ayano
AU - Ohashi, Yasuo
AU - Nishio, Kazuto
AU - Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the West Japan Oncology Group, a nonprofit organization, and by Health Labour Sciences Research of Japan grants 200925029B and 201314041A and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development grant 201438137A.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - PURPOSE Although gene expression profiling is a promising diagnostic technique to determine the tissue of origin for patients with cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), no clinical trial has evaluated yet site-specific therapy directed by this approach compared with empirical chemotherapy. We therefore performed a randomized study to assess whether such site-specific therapy improves outcome compared with empirical chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with CUP. PATIENTS AND METHODS Comprehensive gene expression profiling was performed by microarray analysis, and an established algorithm was applied to predict tumor origin. Patients with CUP were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard site-specific therapy or empirical paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC). The primary end point was 1-year survival rate. RESULTS One hundred thirty patients were randomly assigned and had sufficient biopsy tissue for molecular analysis. Efficacy analysis was performed for 50 and 51 patients in the site-specific therapy and empirical PC arms, respectively. Cancer types most commonly predicted were pancreatic (21%), gastric (21%), and lymphoma (20%). The 1-year survival rate was 44.0% and 54.9% for site-specific treatment and empirical PC (P = .264), respectively. Median overall and progression-free survival were 9.8 and 5.1 months, respectively, for site-specific treatment versus 12.5 and 4.8 months for empirical PC (P = .896 and .550, respectively). Median overall survival (16.7 v 10.6 months; P = .116) and progression-free survival (5.5 v 3.9 months; P = .018) were better for predicted more-responsive than less-responsive tumor types. CONCLUSION Site-specific treatment that was based on microarray profiling did not result in a significant improvement in 1-year survival compared with empirical PC, although prediction of the original site seemed to be of prognostic value.
AB - PURPOSE Although gene expression profiling is a promising diagnostic technique to determine the tissue of origin for patients with cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), no clinical trial has evaluated yet site-specific therapy directed by this approach compared with empirical chemotherapy. We therefore performed a randomized study to assess whether such site-specific therapy improves outcome compared with empirical chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with CUP. PATIENTS AND METHODS Comprehensive gene expression profiling was performed by microarray analysis, and an established algorithm was applied to predict tumor origin. Patients with CUP were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard site-specific therapy or empirical paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC). The primary end point was 1-year survival rate. RESULTS One hundred thirty patients were randomly assigned and had sufficient biopsy tissue for molecular analysis. Efficacy analysis was performed for 50 and 51 patients in the site-specific therapy and empirical PC arms, respectively. Cancer types most commonly predicted were pancreatic (21%), gastric (21%), and lymphoma (20%). The 1-year survival rate was 44.0% and 54.9% for site-specific treatment and empirical PC (P = .264), respectively. Median overall and progression-free survival were 9.8 and 5.1 months, respectively, for site-specific treatment versus 12.5 and 4.8 months for empirical PC (P = .896 and .550, respectively). Median overall survival (16.7 v 10.6 months; P = .116) and progression-free survival (5.5 v 3.9 months; P = .018) were better for predicted more-responsive than less-responsive tumor types. CONCLUSION Site-specific treatment that was based on microarray profiling did not result in a significant improvement in 1-year survival compared with empirical PC, although prediction of the original site seemed to be of prognostic value.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064110139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064110139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.18.00771
DO - 10.1200/JCO.18.00771
M3 - Article
C2 - 30653423
AN - SCOPUS:85064110139
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 37
SP - 570
EP - 579
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 7
ER -