TY - JOUR
T1 - Real World Survey of Patient Engagement Status in Clinical Research
T2 - The First Input from Japan
AU - Tanemura, Nanae
AU - Sasaki, Tsuyoshi
AU - Sato, Junko
AU - Urushihara, Hisashi
N1 - Funding Information:
This research received two specific grants, from the Research Foundation for Pharmaceutical Sciences in 2019 and the Pfizer Health Research Foundation in 2018.
Funding Information:
Tsuyoshi Sasaki has received speakers’ honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Janssen, Otsuka, Shionogi, Shire, Takeda, Taisho, and Tanabe Mitsubishi, and has also received research support from Novartis, Otsuka, Shionogi, and Taisho (from April 2014 to December 2019). Hisashi Urushihara has received a research grant from Shionogi and Senju Pharmaceutical Corporation, and has also received research funds from Daiichi Sankyo, Tanabe Mitsubishi, and Astellas. Nanae Tanemura and Junko Sato declare no potential conflicts of interest regarding the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Background: The updated international draft guidelines, the “General Considerations for Clinical Studies, ICH E8 (R1)”, state that patient engagement ensures that all perspectives are captured in the research process; however, this is not well understood, specifically in Japan. Objective: This study examined the current status and perceptions of patient engagement in clinical research from the perspectives of patient groups, pharmaceutical corporations, and researchers in Japan, using anonymous self-administered questionnaires. Methods: Three online surveys were conducted with patient groups (n = 100), pharmaceutical corporations (n = 66), and researchers (n = 300) in May and June 2019. The main variables were the current status and the current perception of patient engagement in clinical research. Results: The response rate was 71% for patient groups and 85% for pharmaceutical corporations, and there were 300 valid responses (emergence rate: 4.9%) from researchers. Experiences with clinical research involving patient engagement were reported by 76.5% of the patients, 21.4% of the pharmaceutical corporations, and 51.7% of the researchers. Patient groups reported three major factors that negatively impacted their relationship with pharmaceutical corporations and researchers: (1) ‘lack of understanding of the benefits of partnering’; (2) ‘lack of transparency or openness’; and (3) ‘unclear or ill-defined processes’. Conclusions: Pharmaceutical corporations in Japan have less experience with patient engagement in clinical research than other stakeholders. A neutral connecting system among the stakeholders with a constructive co-learning system will allow effective involvement/engagement of patient groups for enhancing the effectiveness of clinical research.
AB - Background: The updated international draft guidelines, the “General Considerations for Clinical Studies, ICH E8 (R1)”, state that patient engagement ensures that all perspectives are captured in the research process; however, this is not well understood, specifically in Japan. Objective: This study examined the current status and perceptions of patient engagement in clinical research from the perspectives of patient groups, pharmaceutical corporations, and researchers in Japan, using anonymous self-administered questionnaires. Methods: Three online surveys were conducted with patient groups (n = 100), pharmaceutical corporations (n = 66), and researchers (n = 300) in May and June 2019. The main variables were the current status and the current perception of patient engagement in clinical research. Results: The response rate was 71% for patient groups and 85% for pharmaceutical corporations, and there were 300 valid responses (emergence rate: 4.9%) from researchers. Experiences with clinical research involving patient engagement were reported by 76.5% of the patients, 21.4% of the pharmaceutical corporations, and 51.7% of the researchers. Patient groups reported three major factors that negatively impacted their relationship with pharmaceutical corporations and researchers: (1) ‘lack of understanding of the benefits of partnering’; (2) ‘lack of transparency or openness’; and (3) ‘unclear or ill-defined processes’. Conclusions: Pharmaceutical corporations in Japan have less experience with patient engagement in clinical research than other stakeholders. A neutral connecting system among the stakeholders with a constructive co-learning system will allow effective involvement/engagement of patient groups for enhancing the effectiveness of clinical research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088795767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088795767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40271-020-00436-5
DO - 10.1007/s40271-020-00436-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 32725324
AN - SCOPUS:85088795767
SN - 1178-1653
VL - 13
SP - 623
EP - 632
JO - Patient
JF - Patient
IS - 5
ER -